What a sore loser!
You are completely twisting your stupid BF3 & MW3 comparison paragraph and trying to make sense out of it. Even at that you are failing miserably & posting nonsense about my "reading comprehension" & "dumbass" & what not.
Fact of the matter is that you haven't played much of either BF3 or MW3 & you don't even understand that what really constitutes a BF3 experience and how it is distinguished when compared to an MW3 experience. Lets blame it on your IQ.
Yay, let's talk about ranks now. Next is what, K/D ratio, dog tags? Or no. of times, you took a sh*t today? Don't even bother to respond, please, as I am not interested in argument, just cause you fail to grasp the meaning of some post.
You are, what is best described as a "n00b". You are a n00b NOT because of your KDR or W/L ratio but because you refuse to understand the underlying logic, repeatedly. I asked about your game hours and your rank to estimate your "experience" & not your skill or e-penis size you naive person.
Time--->experience--->better understanding--->not a n00b
I wouldn't say so. I started only last month, and early on, all I found was bunch of dumbasses, who will prefer to waste a ticket, instead of accepting revive. After you are at rank 15+, it might be easy to get better opponents, but in the beginning, it is pretty much mw3. Heck, even I do the same thing, in few cases, just so, I can rank up and match against competitive players. I have been in many matches where all we did was stay near mcom, and the squad of 4 was enough to hold attackers for 70 tickets. That's why I will not say it is better than mw3 if you exclude jets.
^This paragraph you wrote reeks of the fact that you have no real experience of either of the games.
This paragraph screams of the fact that you started playing BF3 but never understood the game and then rage quit it only to come here and foolishly compare it with a corridor shooter. And then fit in "Jets" somewhere in your theory. If this is NOT the fact then you should write better instead of blaming others' reading comprehension & what not.
The last statement "That's why I will not say it is better than MW3 if you exclude jets" is so naive that I don't have words to describe it. My "reading comprehension" decodes the meaning that you think "MW3=BF3 (if not for the jets). Which is wrong. And if it doesn't mean that but means something else that's hidden in your heart
then try & frame it in a better sentence. Don't bother replying.