pArth Posted June 6, 2011 Report Share Posted June 6, 2011 Developer : Gearbox Software Release : 2012 [gt]714917[/gt] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricky87 Posted June 6, 2011 Report Share Posted June 6, 2011 Wow, a low blow from Gearbox or Ubisoft? Cant believe this. Those who follow BIA franchise would know what I am talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bird Bird Bird Posted June 6, 2011 Report Share Posted June 6, 2011 Looks :fap: Needz gameplay vid ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pArth Posted June 6, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 6, 2011 ^^ seriously ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bird Bird Bird Posted June 6, 2011 Report Share Posted June 6, 2011 ^^ seriously ? Yeah. It looked badass in an IB kinda way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricky87 Posted June 6, 2011 Report Share Posted June 6, 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVsfUk0XoFM This is a sad shock My favorite franchise turned into a cartoon game, wow And here I am wondering if this had anything to do with the Furious Five. More like inglorious bastards i think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kunallkw Posted June 6, 2011 Report Share Posted June 6, 2011 This is a sad shock My favorite franchise turned into a cartoon game, wow the man has spoken Matt Baker or GTFO ... but as usual no judging on CG's so will wait for Gameplay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricky87 Posted June 6, 2011 Report Share Posted June 6, 2011 the man has spoken Matt Baker or GTFO ... but as usual no judging on CG's so will wait for Gameplay Im fine with no judging but why have Brothers in Arms name in front when there is no Matt Baker and rest of the squad in it? This could be a good game, no arguments, but this is not Brothers in Arms! I still cannot believe this, I always thought only Infinity Ward could do something like this, but wow Gearbox This beauty is sinking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kunallkw Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 E3 2011: Brothers in Arms: Furious 4 Impressions Brothers in Arms: Furious 4 is one of those games that has us wondering: why call your game a continuation of an established series, when it has less in common with that series' previous entries than any number of other games? Or, in the case of Furious 4, Quentin Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds? The affinity with that film runs deeper than just the comic, theatrically violent announcement trailer. Movie-style presentation and brash, deeply unserious Nazi-busting are front and centre all through the demo to which we're treated. By the end, our four disparate Allied heroes are mowing down the Führer's minions with chainsaws, dismembering them with improvised explosive bear traps, and gunning them out of the sky--the ones with rocketeer-like Nazi jetpacks, that is. A sensitive, historically reverent World War II military sim this game is not. Instead, it's a first-person shooter with optional four-player co-op and endless winks and nudges to an audience which, the game presumes, is tired of straight-faced WWII games. In the demo, the titular Furious 4 are assaulting a German town by night. The 4 are as notorious in their World War II as the Basterds are in theirs, we're informed by a Wanted ("Gesucht", rather) poster featuring the four heroes' faces. Comment on this videoWatch this video in High Def The town, explains a movie-style narrator, is hosting Nazi revelries: as the four playable characters enter the Bavarian-looking burg, we see fireworks burst over the rooftops, sharing the night sky with a towering Ferris wheel and a zeppelin floating above a distant hill. Here and elsewhere the visuals are high-contrast and richly coloured, angling for stylish rather than ultra-realistic--and it works, for the most part, with warmly lit, Nazi-packed taverns and a glittering old-school funfair among the environmental highlights. We watch as the hulking Montana tears through German baddies with his heavy machine gun, occasionally mixing it up with a hurled, one-hit-kill hatchet, while one of his buddies sets about the enemy with a flamethrower. Later in the demo, Montana acquires a chainsaw--the melee reticule is a little smiley face--and adds a grenade to a bear trap, to produce an explosive bear trap for use in holding off the enemy during a siege section. In scripted, slow-motion "action moments", of which we see a couple, the four cohorts are brought together to do a breach and clear, for instance, or to commandeer a armoured vehicle and crash it into a Nazi tavern shindig. Though it may not feel much like the Brothers in Arms series with which players are familiar, those who weren't hoping for more of the same from the series may get a kick out of Furious 4's irreverent bravado. Fans of the earlier games might well be left cold--but there are worse things to be than Inglorious Basterds: The Video Game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PS Fan Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 WTH .....Its not a BIA game...HELL NO... :rant: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 I'm kinda looking forward to it. This isn't BiA though. I'd prefer to think of it as a spin-off. Much like IB's take on WW2 history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctrl_alt_del Posted June 16, 2011 Report Share Posted June 16, 2011 The game is not as bad as you guys are thinking. From what I saw during the developer walkthrough, it promises to be tonnes of fun. I agree that the appending the BIA name was not a great move and will put-off a lot of people but if seen as a stand-alone new IP, the game seems to be promising. 4 player co-op is a hoot to play with friends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Posted June 16, 2011 Report Share Posted June 16, 2011 Plus didn't they say that the Matt Baker story will be continued in another game? So people really shouldn't get worried about the future of the franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Posted June 16, 2011 Report Share Posted June 16, 2011 Double-post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctrl_alt_del Posted June 16, 2011 Report Share Posted June 16, 2011 Yup, this is their stab at trying something different after the three Matt Baker games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Boss Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 BIA FANS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaka_messi Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 the man has spoken Matt Baker or GTFO ... but as usual no judging on CG's so will wait for Gameplay +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctrl_alt_del Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 Gameplay will not dissapoint, that is for sure. Now that they have the eye-balls, why not just drop the BIA name and go with Furious Four or something new? In all honesty, a new IP at this time will excite more people than the sneaking one under an old IP, which might or might not have as many fans as you wish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 Gameplay will not dissapoint, that is for sure. Now that they have the eye-balls, why not just drop the BIA name and go with Furious Four or something new? In all honesty, a new IP at this time will excite more people than the sneaking one under an old IP, which might or might not have as many fans as you wish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctrl_alt_del Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 Add something worthwhile to the thread Snake or ... this is getting enough flak as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.