^^ Well BFBC2 had a decent story and numerous environments like Snowstorms , Deserts etc.The plot was better than COD WAW , which is the only COD game that I've played.
In that case, don't bother comparing an entire series. Mmmkay...?

^^ Well BFBC2 had a decent story and numerous environments like Snowstorms , Deserts etc.The plot was better than COD WAW , which is the only COD game that I've played.
Leaves falling from trees / Snow drifting onto the ground / Life leaving your corpse
^^ Well BFBC2 had a decent story and numerous environments like Snowstorms , Deserts etc.The plot was better than COD WAW , which is the only COD game that I've played.
They were gonna make me a Major for this, and I wasn't even in their f**ckin' army anymore.
I know all about the issues of Bf3 man. I'm just saying that the name wont matter. Both games are developed by the same guys and they both have the same MP philosophy - realistic combat with vehicles thrown into the mix.
DICE could have named BF3 as BFBC3 and given us a SP campaign with the bad company guys and no one would have been any wiser. The only thing separating both games is their SP campaign.
I know all about the issues of Bf3 man. I'm just saying that the name wont matter. Both games are developed by the same guys and they both have the same MP philosophy - realistic combat with vehicles thrown into the mix.
DICE could have named BF3 as BFBC3 and given us a SP campaign with the bad company guys and no one would have been any wiser. The only thing separating both games is their SP campaign.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users