Jump to content

@@di

Members
  • Posts

    222
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by @@di

  1. tru dat ... frm wat i've seen of cavani (means jus juve milan n youtube vids) he doesn seem like he'd score n extra ordinary wtf goal but to score goals like dat chelsea has mata hazard oscar .

    cavani wud be a good fit grt finishin n poaching skills.

     

    if higuain to juve nt happenin, thn i hope they try fr gomez (if he comes fr cheap)

     

     

    is lewandowski to bayern done yt ?? if yes good fr bayern .... way to go destroy the competition :mellow:

  2. so what you both are saying is only the top clubs should be allowed to spend big, going by what credentials exactly ?

     

    by your logic any mid table club should only spend when it has got a comparable fan base and trophies to show but that will come only when it has good star power to pull in fans and get results, football now is lot more demanding. this idea of newly rich clubs destroying football is cry of old powerful clubs over their loss of market monopoly, nothing more. if you think a new club is spending beyond their means and is buying players just for the heck of it, then the market corrections will take their course ala leeds or more recently portsmouth. even the financial fair play is biased as some clubs have had a headstart in their brand and image; if you restrict ability to buy purely on the revenue earned then there would be no way for any club to challange the old guard- the clubs cant buy players because of low income (directly relates to fan following) and fanbase wouldnt increase unless supers stars come and help get results, a mean circle.

     

     

    only alternative way is to have a uniform salary/transfer cap across league. apart from that if you like free market, you'll have to accept rich owners. also it is not as if all clubs thay have a powerful rich owner are throwing money blindly, we had our first break even under roman couple of seasons ago and things have been looking up since. proper management and clash splurge are not mutually exclusive.

     

     

    we should not look to standerdise market and team building policies for every team. both team building and team buying can co exist. it would be pretty boring if only one is allowed. Look at bVb and swansea, poster child for team building and achieving success.

     

     

     

    ....

    no wat i'm saying is they shouldn buy entire 11 player team in one go !! build a team don buy a team !! first spend a lil build a bigger fan base improve status frm a relegated team to competitors gradually rather thn in one go !! i understnd tht without spendin big teams cannot compete for the title (of course thr r exceptions)... but doesn mean they shud spen it in one go !!! nw if psg din have moura i bet they wudve finished at the same place in league n cl n spent around 80m(i wish it ws 60m but still) ... they wudve gotten some better recognition wider fan base etc !!

     

    agree 100% on ffp being unfair though

     

    ps: i din say mid table clubs shouldn be allowed to spend big

  3. ^^^ completely agree moreover if u buy an entire team of stars at once its bound to fail !! psg shelled out a lot last season n i think if they din have ancelotti they wudnt have gotten as far as they did in cl

    also although united isn't really tht good an example nemo cos they have ( even in early 00s) a large fan base good income n sell some good plyrs too !! plus wat ut did doesn compare to some ridiculous transfers like axel witsel for 40m or even rodriguez for 45m !!! berba was one of the best strikers in the league wen utd got him rio ws and still is grt even veron ws good n united got em in diff seasons ... not like they're a club wit a tiny fanbase tinier stadium low income etc. if you're a top team raking in good cash spendin 40m a yr is quite alright imho

  4. amazin trickery/skills this plyr hs !!! however lacks in physicality n passing....even in the video instead of doin those elaborate tricks he cudve just passed the ball n gotten same/better outcome which is exactly y i doubt he'd be a huge hit at barca !!! but still considerin rodriguez wen for 45m, 24m for neymar is a grt bargain

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...