gamer_adi
-
Posts
1112 -
Joined
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Posts posted by gamer_adi
-
-
gamescon is a disappointment every year...
-
10 minutes ago, adity said:
No one denying that. Arkham was a kickass game. Still is. Spiderman iterated on it and made an even kickassier game. There is 10 pages of nonsense arguments. I won't blame you for not reading it all.
Let me catch you up with the lore.
Basically, Zodka says that because Arkham games came before and Spiderman is inspired by it, it is impossible for anyone to find it better than Arkham. He says Arkham games are objectively better than Spiderman which is obviously stupid on 2 fronts. What came before is irrelevant. Second, there is no objective opinion in any form of art (at least in most cases).
It's a matter of opinion, some like spiderman more, others like Arkham games more (like me and many others), but no denying both are awesome games...
Although, Arkham City is objectively better, simply because of all the crap/poor side missions (about 25 of them done so far) in Spiderman alone
-
crap, nothing good so far...Elden Ring gonna be there?
-
7 minutes ago, adity said:
Dude entire discussion is about what people like more. You guys are getting pissed at people liking spiderman more than Arkham. Spiderman is better than Arkham in every sense imo. You can believe whatever you want. But don't bring all this came first revolutionise that nonsense into it.
You like Arkham more. Good for you.
HL2's physics system itself was revolutionary for it's time, for one...but it's not about being 'just' revolutionary, but about being so ahead of the competitors at the time, that others in the industry just look at you in awe.
Ya, nobody's getting pissed.
Arkham games were the first time somebody had the balls to make a AAA superhero game with kick a*s combat and story, and epically succeeding in it. Now, spiderman has used the Arkham blueprint to make a great Spiderman game, nothing wrong with that. Just as TR2013 used Uncharted as a blueprint...
-
3 minutes ago, adity said:
What are you talking about. Doom was f**king great when it came out. Half Life wasn't the first great shooter. Plenty of great games before and plenty after.
Absolutely non sense off topic discussion.
Where did i say it was the first great shooter?
-
This whole situation is absolutely carbon copy of what Uncharted did with tomb raider.
Uncharted comes, everybody calls it a rip off of tomb raider.
Uncharted 2 happens, blows the lid off in the action adventure genre.
Tomb Raider 2013 looks at unharted games, now copies the uncharted blueprint.
Everybody now accuses TR of copying Uncharted.
-
4 minutes ago, Big Boss said:
Spider-Man PS1 started it all in superhero genre, just like Wolfenstein 3D started it all in shooters. You are talking as if there were no great shooters before Half Life 2 or no great superhero games before Arkham. Arkham combat was aped across all genres in various games but the combat itself was copied from Spider-Man 2. In fact, the whole counter before the move hits seems most natural with Spider-Man with his spidersense ability and not with Batman at all. Arkham games are to DC superhero games is actually correct statement because that was the first good DC superhero game, or first good DC Batman game (not talking about 2D games before)
And that is the point, the fact that wolfenstein 3D started it all doesn't make it the greatest, the things that Half Life 2 and Arkham Asylum achieved with all the tools, inspirations, and already existing systems is what makes them such an achievement.
Before Arkham games, superhero games were all good to mediocre AA stuff at best.
-
1 hour ago, Big Boss said:
Arkham game copied it's combat from Spider-Man 2 PS2 game.
And?
Arkham games are to superhero games what Half Life 2 is to shooters. Statement still stands and everybody knows it.
-
6 hours ago, Joe Cool said:
LMAO sold out for exclusive deal while grabbing money for PC/console release.
Sold out? Are they a big AAA developer who have all the financial backing to let go of such a deal? One of the dev had to sell his house to complete the game, so give me a break with this "sold out" bs you're peddling here bro. You also claimed that this game was never gonna come out, how they were wasting their time and it was gonna flop? So, if you knew it was gonna flop, then why should't they get whatever money they could from whomever was willing to pay them?
-
Ridiculous debate, Arkham games are to superhero games what Half Life 2 is to shooters. Spiderman PS4 is a great game but nothing beyond that.
-
10 minutes ago, AnK said:
Arkham Knight feels like a game made out of Side Missions only
3 minutes ago, Joe Cool said:This is why game sucked. Asylum and City were perfect. I even enjoyed Origins a lot but Knight not so much.
True and True! Even the side-missions took a nose-dive in AK, they went full open-world ubisoft mode, where they designed a side mission for a side-characters, than repeated that same thing 5-10 times throughout the map. And they did that with most of the side-missions in the game. It was bloody exhausting, still got the plat though
-
Arkham City's riddlers stuff was still fun, AK's riddler stuff became a chore cause they forced batmobile even into the riddler trophies!
Rocksteady created and perfected the Arkham combat style, Insomniac expanded on it to fit Spiderman, and did a damn good job of it.
Rocksteady wins this battle hands down. Insomniac's spiderman borrows so much from Arkham games, wish they would do something about the side-missions as well, 50% in, and they have all been so average so far. Arkham city had so many great side-missions.
-
2 hours ago, dylanjosh said:
TDKR wasnt a good movie. BB and TDK yes, but not TDKR.
True.
-
Enjoyed the cg trailer, and it's from Rocksteady, they don't need to come out with a gameplay trailer, esp. for a game that's still a couple of years away.
Also like the fact that WB didn't make just another "Batman" game, Arkham Knight felt boring in parts to me, as great as the combat system was in Arkham games, same atmosphere + same combat system has grown kinda stale now. They needed to do something different and that's exactly what they are doing. And this is where i like WB more than Marvel, they don't mind shaking things up and taking chances.
As far as films are concerned, Marvel MCU movies have achieved a lot, but let's face it, they will never touch the heights of Nolan Trilogy or Joker. Nor will they ever match the heights of fox movies like Logan and Deadpool. They will always be like a fast food burger joint, you will get exactly what you pay for, nothing more, it will taste great a lot of the times, but it will never blow you socks off.
-
8 minutes ago, CarbonCore said:
Origins still had badass combat. Even if you remove co-op and leveling system from this, the combat looks severely lacking compared to Arkham Origin.
Origins had good boss battles, combat was what you had expect from an Arkham game, which was really good. Still a boring game for me, this looks the same.
-
Definitely made by the Arkham Origins team
-
Disappointing so far...
-
Looks great!
-
Agreed with most of what you said, but research stations sucks imho, done 3 of them and all of them were crap, 30% in overall, loving it.
- Collecting backpacks sucks too, but love the references. Traversal is fun so not much of a bother. Same goes for photography, newspapers, etc., these things add a lot of character to Spider-man and the world.
- Random crimes are ok, some are fun like car chases, etc. Again goes with the whole vibe of being Spider-man.
- Love JJJ Fun with Facts radio show. It is to this game what Chronical of Arkham/Mystery Diaries was to Arkham Asylum.
- Missable audio clips are a bummer though.
Overall, great so far, but prefer Arkham Asylum's riddles, Interview Tapes, Chronical of Arkham/Mystery Diaries, to this game's version of it. Spider-man's borrowed a lot from Arkham games in mostly all the right ways, both game equally captured the feeling of bring batman and spider-man respectively.
-
Ps4 for me, next year on a new pc... looks like GOTY 2020
-
Saw Hulk gameplay vid, it was bad, and looked so slow and boring, even the boss battle was a*s. Something's off with this game's combat, just like Godfall's!
-
I will wait it out then, have till January, hopefully supply issues will be shorted out by then, might even get one for myself as well, had no idea switch was just 12-15k now, or would have gotten one last year itself.
-
17 hours ago, blitzkreiig said:
Switch can be procured for 28k.
You mean the lite version?
16 hours ago, blitzkreiig said:I came across this site while searching for Xbox....They had it in stock. Now gone.
How are they selling it for 28k when flipkart n amazon have it for 54k? Is the site legit?
16 hours ago, CarbonCore said:That's two times what I paid for it in last Oct lol.
How?
My nephew asked me for a ps5 which isn't gonna happen. He will turn 6 in January and i thought i will get him a switch instead. But lite doesn't work on tv
Is only handheld version good enough? Also, do Nintendo games ever go on discount or will i have to buy them at 5k a pop?
-
Once you guys play this one, you will all realize why Mafia 2 was such a fail, both from story and missions perspective. The missions in 1 blows the crap that was Mafia 2 away.
-
1
-
Ratchet & Clank - Rift Apart
in Games
Posted
Looks great, gotta get around to doing a R&C PS4 full playthrough now, assisted my 5 year old nephew earlier this year, know the game inside out, but never got around to completing it.