Jump to content

Vaibhavp

Members
  • Posts

    3745
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Vaibhavp

  1. 1 hour ago, Purana Khiladi said:

    See you are the problem dude. Gamers like you is why we have redfall and starfield in the first place.

     

    If your kind increases then games like Last of Us, God of war, RDR and Hogwarts wouldn't be made ever. 

     

    Why do you settle for sh*t man when you can have great games. Baffling. 

     

    Last of us is waste of money. 

     

    Spending $200 million on what could have been made in $50 million. Play Plagues Tale series. 

     

    RDR cannot be made in smaller budget so thats fine. 

     

    Same goes for Starfield. God of War is also fine. 

     

    If game concept justifies bigger budget, by all means spend on it. 

  2. 21 minutes ago, AnK said:


    I am not finding negatives in them….they are visibly great games.

     

    But the makers of Evil Within who’s founder was the creator of Resident Evil making HiFi Rush is not acceptable to me.

     

    Maybe to you but I’d rather want these teams to focus on what is expected rather than what is unexpected from them.

     

    M$ has a big budget…..they should have opened the doors for these studios to make AAA & compete with Sony + Nintendo & I would have been the first one rooting for them.

     

    But they are taking a path that I don’t like personally.

     

    I don't think they should make $200 million games unless game absolutely cannot be made without it. 

     

    AA style game with a good variety they are putting out is what I would rather have. 

     

    34 minutes ago, AnK said:

    Avowed wasn’t presented as AA game in anyway while it was being announced.

     

    Infact it was coined in with the AAAA statements.

    But now obviously after having a look at it the stance is being shifted by the bots.

     

     

    I don’t think Alan Wake 2 can be characterised in a AA catagory as it seems to have significantly high production quality just like Alan Wake 1.

     

    But can only tell after reviews as it’s being heavily embargoed.

     

     

    Don't know AW2 budget. Would be surprised if it was higher than 50m. That's AA category. 2-3 million sales and you are good. 

     

    Avowed is clarified by Obsidian CEO himself, it's AA. It's not Skyrim level production as people thought it was going to be. 

  3. 4 minutes ago, gamer_adi said:

     

    82 isn't "bad"

     

    Lies of P has 80 meta, one of the best soulsborne games not made by FROM SOFTWARE...

     

    Wolfenstein: The New Order - 79

     

    Prey - 79

     

    Reviews isn't the end-all-be-all of gaming outside of psvsxbox thread.

     

     

    Yeah, agreed. 

     

    I pay less attention to metascore, the more it goes like this. 

  4. 2 minutes ago, AnK said:

     

     

    But obviously I don’t was everything from:-

    -Halo 3 ending up like Halo Infinite 

    -Gears 2 ending up like Gears 4

    -ForzaM6 ending up like ForzaM8

    -Fable ending up like Legends

    -Obsidian making Grounded & Pentament

    -Tango making HighFi

    -Dishonoured turned into Redfall 

    -Fallout turned into Starfield

     

     

    This one takes the cake. Hall of fame level post :roflroll:

     

    Never knew one could find negatives in creating brand new games like Starfield and HI FI Rush. 

  5. 7 minutes ago, AnK said:

     

    A subscription Service like this needs constant funding from upwards of hundreds of millions of subscribers or else the content needed to keep it running can’t be funded appropriately.

     

    That is why more & more games are more like AA quality instead of AAA.

    (let alone AAAA as promises :rofl: )

     

    Even gamers like VaibhavPK & many of his Twitter lords are openly rooting for a AA subscribers industry trend instep of games like Starfield,ES,Diablo & COD.

     

    AA games are good. 

     

    Games like Avowed, Alan Wake 2 etc. 

     

    Not every game has to have Starfield Or Diablo 4 budget. 

  6. 20 minutes ago, AnK said:


    Because these issues were never worth making a hue & cry over until they became a meme.

     

    But wtf whome am I even replying to…

     

    Aren’t you one of those passionate gamers who is still enjoying Redfall as it was your “dream game”…..specially after the much awaited 60fps patch!!

     

    ………you are right………..

     

    ?!?!

     

    What is worth making hue and cry about? 

     

    Making same game again with a different story definitely is one. 

  7. 50 minutes ago, AnK said:

     

    Nothing but praise & no mention of any more than a blip in technical shortcomings!!

     

    No matter how much hue & cry is made.

     

    91-90 is set in stone against 83….

     

    2023 will always be remembered for you & your likes being ridiculed to infinity & beyond for trying to hype a an outright mediocre line-up up against the entire first half of Sony’s showstopper moments :lol: 

     

     

    This just cements their shill nature. 

     

    10/10 in reviews while their actual twitter account is posting issues with the game. 

     

    It's an irrelevant metric at this point. 

  8. 23 minutes ago, triggr happy ss said:

    😂

     

    I thought xbots were lying ,now all reviewers are facing problems .

     

    Spiderman 2 is the 1st one of kind open world linear game ,whatever the f**k that means .Try to do anything else and you encounter all the bugs in the game. 
     

    Bloody 7.5 game with below average quests. Its a masterpiece of lame a*s side quests 😂

     

    This is putting Fifa / COD to shame in terms of incremental improvements, especially when you consider it's a generational leap. 

     

    Yet it's somehow game of the generation contender (91 metascore) 

     

    Journalists are lost cause. They don't update review scores based on how game is today. 

  9. 3 minutes ago, Purana Khiladi said:

    So you wanted batman in Spiderman2?

     

    You have 2 spidey in the sequel,venom,more bombastic setpieces throughout and that Holy sh*t traversal for which everyone is calling it THE next gen moment and still you arent satisfied? 

     

    What do you want man lol

     

    Traversal is faster. I get it. Slightly better than original. 

     

    Is that enough for a 4 point metascore bump. Dont think so. 

     

    Everything else seems way too similar to original. Even weak points. 

     

    Even traversal isn't as much improved as it should have. 

     

    They have bugs on top of that. 

  10. 46 minutes ago, radicaldude said:

    Ivg master-bot-er @triggr happy ss has been speaking a lot about Spiderman 2's gameplay length. 

     

    I guess bots come with limited memory as Spender cheaps out on putting quality memory while manufacturing such bots. 

     

    He has completely forgotten that even after spending 500 million usd and gazillion years, 343 could only muster an open world halo with a single player campaign length of around 10 hours only. 

     

    Screenshot-20231023-125552.png

     

     

    A wise man once said. 

     

     

    83hyi6.jpg

     

     

     

    You can't be serious with this. 

     

    Then I will bring up steam current players for comparison between both publishers, and everyone will be like.... This is so unfair. 

  11. 27 minutes ago, RV1709 said:


     

    “I am hearing” is very different from “I am playing” but go off

     

    Yes all gaming journalists who have played the game and rated it are lying but series L xbot user here who hasn’t played the game is accurate with his scoring. Loser behaviour indeed  

     

    All the journalists are saying it's more of the same. Yet giving it higher scores for some reason. 

     

    Seems odd to me. 

  12. 2 minutes ago, RV1709 said:

     

     

    it is after all a sequel so it will not be a complete reboot. If all sequels are reductive like you said then

     

    1. gears of war 2 should rate below the original

    2. Arkham city is worse than asylum 

    3. uncharted 2 is below uncharted 1

    4. Halo 2/3 are not as good as 1 

     

     

     

    Sequals here have improved or at least changed considerably. 

     

    SM2 i am hearing has same issues as original. Side activities, slow walking sections, etc. 

     

    7 minutes ago, RV1709 said:


    here’s my reasons

    1. Storytelling and set pieces are insanely intricate and grandiose

    2. Combat builds on the original, extremely fluid and addictive 

    3. The fast travel, switching and scenario changes are next level - non existent loading (yet to see this in any game specifically on competitive platforms)

     

     

     

    This was present in original as well, no? Except fast loading. 

  13. 3 minutes ago, RV1709 said:


    of course let’s rate a game without having played it.  
     

    In that case, starfield is a good 65 because it’s a reductive no man’s sky. It’s also very previous gen looking.  Has a ton of dead planets to do nothing in. The engine is straight out of 2010

     

    You have played it. 

     

    But haven't said anything about why it's better than original. 

     

    I can talk about Starfield if you are interested. 

  14. 41 minutes ago, RV1709 said:


    Diablo 3%, cyberpunk 1%, starfield 1%. Meanwhile the guy is collecting bug posts about a game not on his system online lmao. Loser behaviour 

     

    You don't have to take it so hard dude. 

     

    It's still a good 85 metascore game. Inflated for whatever reason. (85 cause it's derivative, part 1 is 87 so this gets lower). Metacritic isn't reliable any more. 

×
×
  • Create New...