Out of 10, only 2 will succeed in GAAS.
They say AAA isnt sustainable due to high costs. Wonder how much GAAS is sustainable when you have failed again in again in making a GAAS game. Isn't that bearing cost and too much burden on devs.
This is true to some extent but the Erafication of IVG also was the reason for forum being silent now. Especially @piper with his nonsense policing and too many banning for petty reasons. Should have kept IVG the way it was from start.
Did they change base game as well? As in missions and all? Because apart from a technical failure at launch, the complains about gameplay, missions and story were also there which was mediocre. Have they redone that as well?
Why would they?
Day1 games from MS was a desperate measure not a strategic one.
Sony/Nintendo aint foolish to release games day1 when its selling 5 million in a week.
You have to be really out of reality to think that Sony/Nintendo will release their marque games on a service day1 soon when its creating records sales wise
GP is a failure. A colossal one. No one will attempt ever again.
When you have nothing logical to say, take high ground and try to leave
When are you going to your favourite Porkistan though?
Did you celebrate 26/11 as well?
One bad entry doesn't make a dent to COD. If next one is good then its all forgotten. Its no ordinary game, it will take a lot of f**k ups to bring it down.