Jump to content

CarbonCore

Administrators
  • Posts

    24265
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    179

Posts posted by CarbonCore

  1. 1 hour ago, WhiteWolf said:

    Yes and CD will responsible for the quality game as well. We will just ignore Darren is the head of studio who brought CD to work on the game he will have no say on the game and creative director is from Initiative and Senior Producer is from Initiative, these people will changeentire vision of the game and do what CD will tell them not vice versa.lol

     

    If CD had full control then game would have become 3rd person not first lol 

     

    I don't give a sh*t who's the lead and who's supporting it. I only said I'm fine with CD making the game (if they are) because it looks like a lot of people got triggered by that idea, probably because they think CD is some low level developer.

    • Like 2
  2. 2 hours ago, WhiteWolf said:

    So, i guess you already declared that now PD is by CD and Initiative is a support team? Lol

     

    So now if game is flop then blame will be on entirely on CD coz they are main team working on game and Initiative is side contract QA team as per you all. Lol.

     

     

    There no shame in accepting that just like there's no shame in accepting that BloodBorne is a Fromsoft game and MGS Revengence is a Platinum game. CD is fantastic studio. Also game will be on GP so its beyond hit and flop metrics.

  3. 55 minutes ago, l33tmaniac said:

     

    I meant 1800p is a 15% reduction on both the axis.  I get where you are coming from with the pixel density. I was referring to the spec power and not pixel density that would be required to render the resolution.

     

     

     

    That's not how it works in terms of rendering. Just like how it takes 4x times less processing to render 1080p compared to 4K, its takes 68% less GPU when you go from 4K to 1800p. The reduction in individual horizonal and vertical axis has no meaning when finding out required spec power.

     

    I don't know who wrote that PC guide but its totally wrong. You don't render stuff on just one axis.

  4. 30 minutes ago, l33tmaniac said:

     

    1800p is almost 80% of 4k. 30fps at 4k vs 60fps at 1800p doesnt make sense either.

     

    The game is locked at 30, could be running at 38-45 etc. Plus 60fps doesn't hold all the time.

     

    Also 1800p is 68% of 4K.

  5. Always thought DF's 1296p was too low when the game ran at full 4K in quality mode. 30 to 60 doesn't tank resolution by nearly 4 times. Hell the Pro runs at higher res but at 30fps. Good to see NXG correcting the mistake again.

  6. 14 minutes ago, triggr happy ss said:

    It is shocking for a company with a “for the players“ slogan ,specially when other smaller publishers are doing a much better job. 
     

    Anyways dont want to start another useless discussion .

     

    Did people actually believe "for the players" slogan? :lol: 

×
×
  • Create New...