Critic's required

[ColorCodePurple]

Edit

[Ne0]

^^All those problems exist with democracy, but it also gives the people the option to overthrow them. Thats the high point of democracy against dictatorship.

 

Also, regarding population, i read a saying somewhere - 'all those people who propogate birth control, are the ones who are already born' ;-)

[jDaMn]

Limitations Of Democracy

By Vyom Sahni (thats me )

 

Limitations of democracy is one of the most controversial topic in the history of essay topics [awkward, doesn't establish importance/interest - who cares about 'essay topics'], to criticize democracy is to be despot, to fight it is to be a terrorist [incorrect, in fact, possibly the exact opposite is true] so before I start I would like to assure the readers that I am neither a power hungry dictator nor a terrorist []. I am but a humble writer who is pointing out to the world that the oh-so-holy democracy [pick a more suitable phrase] isn’t so holy after all [may be better not to reference religion].

“Democracy is the form of government where 51 people may take away the rights of the other 49”

 

A statement rightly said by Thomas Jefferson one of the first American presidents [as opposed to 1 or 10 people taking away the rights of the other 99/90?]. We see this today as politicians tend to support only the community which gives them the most votes [establish limits for statement - India or globally? Recently or over all history? Is this a problem at all?], this leads to a certain [specify what kind - this is ambiguous] discontentment among the minority community which ultimately encourages protests, coups and rebellion [you need facts]. Very good example are the Indian-Tamils who are the victims of the Sinhala majority in Sri Lanka [arguing using examples, lack of context, one sided pov]. Because of the majoritarian [check word] policies allowed by the Sri Lankan government discontentment among the Tamils rose and the group known as LTTE was formed [aren't you over-simplifying an extremely complicated bit of history?] which was until recently was a major cause for violence in Sri-lanka.Another way in which democracy affects the [grammar] unity is the [grammar] regional/caste politics, a remarkable example is present in our own country: Raj Thackeray the man who wants Bombay to comprise only of Maharashtra’s [check word + not entirely accurate]. Naturally this man’s policies made all [all? Not really] Maharashtra’s [again] feel ‘Special’ and because of this suddenly they turn against all [incorrect] the people of other states [incorrect]. This is obviously a serious threat to the integrity of the country [as compared to?] but nothing can be done about it because the central government loses popularity among the people that way [full stop. explain. Your earlier reasoning would indicate the central government should act to get more votes, and this is a minority]

An unnamed politician [are you serious? At least write that he did not wish to be identified or something similar] once said:

“ Suppose I want to order more Policemen into Delhi to keep up the security, if I would have been a dictator what would I have done? I would pull over a set of papers prepared for me by my secretary, sign it with a flourish and there would be more officers

But now this sort of thing is not possible we have got a whole legislature there are so many men and women who instantly turn into uncounted gaggles of geese the instant a suggestion is made. In the first place where is the funding going to come from? You can’t have say ten Thousand more officers without paying ten thousand more salary’s [check word] and even if this is done who is going to control them? The legislature shouts at each other, thunders and lightens and in the end nothing is done” [\quote is pointless - the statement is just plain stupid]

Democracy, adversely effects the unity of the country and delays decisions of the highest priority.

Indeed this is the very reason why some countries are on a brink of getting divided into smaller states [either name them or don't mention this at all].

One point which people never become tired of pointing out is that democracy gives a single citizen complete and unadulterated [pick a better word] freedom within the laws of the government. Obviously the majority (out of which by the way approximately 30% are illiterate) [check facts, define scope of statement. why is this 30% figure pertinent?] knows what’s best for itself, but is this belief correct in reality ['obviously' need not be checked - why say that in the first place]? Let us take the example of population [setting up to argue by example again] and see where it takes us [full stop]

 

Almost every individual wants to contribute to the growing population by having kids []. This desire of having kids is one of the most basic need inborn in humans, this obviously leads to more population growth [pause] as the population increase [check word] so does the consumption of resources [pause], already resources are [grammar] depleting on earth [Earth, as opposed to earth] with more consumption, resources such as coal, oil etc would become scarce hence prices would rise and this would increase competition among people, stronger nations having less resources due to overconsumption would plan to occupy weaker nations having more resources thereby leading to war and with every nations armed to the core with nuclear weapons a third world war would well be the last war fought because humanity would cease to exist after that [again, define scope - the time horizon over which this may occur does not preclude the development of alternative sources. Do you have reason to believe the war is imminent?].

An ideal solution naturally would be to limit the population growth [or not - why is it ideal? China will face labor pressures in the coming decades] which can be only done by forcing people to have less kids or even forcibly stopping any population growth for a while [sanjay Gandhi? You were talking about civil unrest..]. But is this move possible in a democracy? No matter how much you tell them your average man wouldn’t really care about the distant future [they don't? Do you know any better? You may. But if you do, tell us why], people are far more concerned about their next meal so to speak. Even if suppose the afore mentioned suggestion to control population magically gets passed by the legislature then also the common man so overvalued [are you implying the common man is currently 'overvalued'?] by democracy will create chaos in the country by a violent orgy of protests [an orgy of... protests? Also, just how do you know this? You just wanted to use the word 'orgy' didn't you ] and the said legislature along with the one who suggested this enlightened [humble writer ] method would get arrested or worse executed brutally…..

 

In a democracy the selfish and immediate desire of the people may be satisfied but the decisions taken are fatal for humanity in the long run[/i] [ignores inability of any other system to deal with complexity in a timely manner - also extreme language 'fatal' with nothing to back it up]

This is the very reason why democracy is famous among the people we care more about our present pleasures than future; bluntly speaking humans are fatally short-sighted. It is indeed high time that we wake up and undo the damage done by this ridiculous mockery of rule

Ill be adding more articles as I get reviews

As a conclusion I would like to say that:

 

Democracy is the complete opposite of dictatorship if a power mad dictator does not know what’s best for humanity, then neither do the people know what’s best for themselves, instead of one selfish dictator democracy deals with more than a million selfish dictator concerned only and only with themselves.

Good luck with your writing, we do know you are young, and it's good to see you like writing. I hope you like reading as well - that will help your language skills and usage, as well as help you get a wider view of important topics and opinions.

[ColorCodePurple]

^^All those problems exist with democracy, but it also gives the people the option to overthrow them. Thats the high point of democracy against dictatorship.

 

Also, regarding population, i read a saying somewhere - 'all those people who propogate birth control, are the ones who are already born' ;-)

There is this thing about democracy,that it is always stagnant that is democracy as a system of government can never change.This is because as I explained in the article Democracy satisfies our immediate and selfish interests'.History has taught us that dictator ship as a form of government can be overthrown,there are infinite examples take your pick

 

Also regarding birth control.My point is actually that more people consume more resources hence increasing competition.With increase of births our resource consumption increases a lot.That is why there is rise in competition.Heck it is the primary reason why you do see beggars on the streets,its because somebody (undoubtfully more deserving) has taken there place in the society.

 

If you have say 100 girls now would it be better i 100 people got 1 girl each or 200 people get 1/2 a girl each? (and you have to beg for the other half?)

 

 

 

(making a reply for the second post,just have to see how I can explain some of your points )

 

By the way thanks to both of you for the reviews

[godspeed4476]

How Old are you?

[ColorCodePurple]

Good luck with your writing, we do know you are young, and it's good to see you like writing. I hope you like reading as well - that will help your language skills and usage, as well as help you get a wider view of important topics and opinions.

Reading was what put me into writing in the first place

 

Limitations Of Democracy

By Vyom Sahni (thats me )

 

Limitations of democracy is one of the most controversial topic in the history of essay topics [awkward, doesn't establish importance/interest - who cares about 'essay topics'-Agreed], to criticize democracy is to be despot, to fight it is to be a terrorist [incorrect, in fact, possibly the exact opposite is true By fightting democracy I mean fighting the system of government called democracy.Opposite is true in the case when I am against a specific party-Or atleast my civics book goes along these lines ] so before I start I would like to assure the readers that I am neither a power hungry dictator nor a terrorist []. I am but a humble writer who is pointing out to the world that the oh-so-holy democracy [pick a more suitable phrase-Cant think of one ] isn’t so holy after all [may be better not to reference religion].

“Democracy is the form of government where 51 people may take away the rights of the other 49”

 

A statement rightly said by Thomas Jefferson one of the first American presidents [as opposed to 1 or 10 people taking away the rights of the other 99/90?*]. We see this today as politicians tend to support only the community which gives them the most votes [establish limits for statement - India or globally? Recently or over all history? Is this a problem at all?], this leads to a certain [specify what kind - this is ambiguous] discontentment among the minority community which ultimately encourages protests, coups and rebellion [you need facts]. Very good example are the Indian-Tamils who are the victims of the Sinhala majority in Sri Lanka [arguing using examples, lack of context, one sided pov]. Because of the majoritarian [check word] policies allowed by the Sri Lankan government discontentment among the Tamils rose and the group known as LTTE was formed [aren't you over-simplifying an extremely complicated bit of history?] which was until recently was a major cause for violence in Sri-lanka.Another way in which democracy affects the [grammar] unity is the [grammar] regional/caste politics, a remarkable example is present in our own country: Raj Thackeray the man who wants Bombay to comprise only of Maharashtra’s [check word + not entirely accurate]. Naturally this man’s policies made all [all? Not really-Agreed but I thought since I was against democracy I could use some elements of debate in the article] Maharashtra’s [again] feel ‘Special’ and because of this suddenly they turn against all [incorrect] the people of other states [incorrect]. This is obviously a serious threat to the integrity of the country [as compared to?] but nothing can be done about it because the central government loses popularity among the people that way [full stop. explain. Your earlier reasoning would indicate the central government should act to get more votes, and this is a minority]

An unnamed politician [are you serious? At least write that he did not wish to be identified or something similarWell not really I took that quote out from an SF book.But again I wanted to use debate elements and this quote seemes pretty valid to me once said:

“ Suppose I want to order more Policemen into Delhi to keep up the security, if I would have been a dictator what would I have done? I would pull over a set of papers prepared for me by my secretary, sign it with a flourish and there would be more officers

But now this sort of thing is not possible we have got a whole legislature there are so many men and women who instantly turn into uncounted gaggles of geese the instant a suggestion is made. In the first place where is the funding going to come from? You can’t have say ten Thousand more officers without paying ten thousand more salary’s [check word] and even if this is done who is going to control them? The legislature shouts at each other, thunders and lightens and in the end nothing is done” [\quote is pointless - the statement is just plain stupid ]

Democracy, adversely effects the unity of the country and delays decisions of the highest priority.

Indeed this is the very reason why some countries are on a brink of getting divided into smaller states [either name them or don't mention this at all].

One point which people never become tired of pointing out is that democracy gives a single citizen complete and unadulterated [pick a better word] freedom within the laws of the government. Obviously the majority (out of which by the way approximately 30% are illiterate) [check facts, define scope of statement. why is this 30% figure pertinent?] knows what’s best for itself, but is this belief correct in reality ['obviously' need not be checked - why say that in the first place]? Let us take the example of population [setting up to argue by example again] and see where it takes us [full stop]

 

Almost every individual wants to contribute to the growing population by having kids . This desire of having kids is one of the most basic need inborn in humans, this obviously leads to more population growth [pause] as the population increase [check word] so does the consumption of resources [pause], already resources are [grammar] depleting on earth [Earth, as opposed to earth] with more consumption, resources such as coal, oil etc would become scarce hence prices would rise and this would increase competition among people, stronger nations having less resources due to overconsumption would plan to occupy weaker nations having more resources thereby leading to war and with every nations armed to the core with nuclear weapons a third world war would well be the last war fought because humanity would cease to exist after that [again, define scope - the time horizon over which this may occur does not preclude the development of alternative sources. Do you have reason to believe the war is imminent? I have written another article which concerns with resources ill put it up in some time :wink: [/b]].

An ideal solution naturally would be to limit the population growth [or not - why is it ideal? China will face labor pressures in the coming decades] which can be only done by forcing people to have less kids or even forcibly stopping any population growth for a while [sanjay Gandhi? You were talking about civil unrest..]. But is this move possible in a democracy? No matter how much you tell them your average man wouldn’t really care about the distant future [they don't? Do you know any better? You may. But if you do, tell us why], people are far more concerned about their next meal so to speak. Even if suppose the afore mentioned suggestion to control population magically gets passed by the legislature then also the common man so overvalued [are you implying the common man is currently 'overvalued'?] by democracy will create chaos in the country by a violent orgy of protests [an orgy of... protests? Also, just how do you know this? You just wanted to use the word 'orgy' didn't you ] and the said legislature along with the one who suggested this enlightened [humble writer ] method would get arrested or worse executed brutally…..

 

In a democracy the selfish and immediate desire of the people may be satisfied but the decisions taken are fatal for humanity in the long run[/i] [ignores inability of any other system to deal with complexity in a timely manner - also extreme language 'fatal' with nothing to back it up]

This is the very reason why democracy is famous among the people we care more about our present pleasures than future; bluntly speaking humans are fatally short-sighted. It is indeed high time that we wake up and undo the damage done by this ridiculous mockery of rule

Ill be adding more articles as I get reviews

As a conclusion I would like to say that:

 

Democracy is the complete opposite of dictatorship if a power mad dictator does not know what’s best for humanity, then neither do the people know what’s best for themselves, instead of one selfish dictator democracy deals with more than a million selfish dictator concerned only and only with themselves.

[ColorCodePurple]

How Old are you?

16

[godspeed4476]

16

Thanks you saved me from all the typing .

I dont know about your writing skills, but your political acumen is non existent, your views are completely flawed and thats completely understandable for your age. but if you follow and analyse politics closely, you will get better understanding in near future.

[Nemo]

will read the whole thing later in peace but just have got to say one thing to all those who think its cool and all to downplay democracy as a governing system-

 

 

Democracy is the best for of governance, sure its got its limitations like every other system out there but it is the best among all, why.. well for the simple reason that its only in a democracy that you can have a free debate, impervious of any threats, on whether the present system of governance is good or not.

[ColorCodePurple]

Thanks you saved me from all the typing .

I dont know about your writing skills, but your political acumen is non existent, your views are completely flawed and thats completely understandable for your age. but if you follow and analyse politics closely, you will get better understanding in near future.

And thats why I need your help.Sorry for asking you to type.But tell me why my views are faulty

 

Main reason why I have posted my views in an online forum is because I can get intrested people to tell me their view and I adjust my views after studying your own.Its how I learn

 

 

will read the whole thing later in peace but just have got to say one thing to all those who think its cool and all to downplay democracy as a governing system-

Democracy is the best for of governance, sure its got its limitations like every other system out there but it is the best among all, why.. well for the simple reason that its only in a democracy that you can have a free debate, impervious of any threats, on whether the present system of governance is good or not.

 

Agreed thats the main thing I love about democracy.But according to me its cons are a major threat to humanity and thats why we need a 'Hybrid' type of government giving equal importance to immidiate and future needs.Democracy does immidiate but doesnt do future

[Solitaire]

I do not know about your ideas, but there are several grammar-related problems in your article - ranging from sentences not being separated properly to missing 'a's, missing commas to stuff like "if suppose", singular and plural cases are mixed up... not to mention your sentences could be framed a whole lot better. Keep reading, you'll improve.

 

Yeah, I'm only talking about the English side of things here.

[ColorCodePurple]

I do not know about your ideas, but there are several grammar-related problems in your article - ranging from sentences not being separated properly to missing 'a's, missing commas to stuff like "if suppose", singular and plural cases are mixed up... not to mention your sentences could be framed a whole lot better. Keep reading, you'll improve.

 

Yeah, I'm only talking about the English side of things here.

 

And that too is crucially needed-For my future

[Solitaire]

More than the system, the problem is the politicians themselves and the far too numerous political parties that necessitate vote bank politics. Everyone wants a piece of the pie. There just isn't enough to go around, so they resort to coalition politics - where each party's Agenda must be met, whether it be right or not (apropos the telecom spectrum allocation scandal, the DMK is a strong ally the Congress cannot afford to lose). Avarice in the place of concern for the people dominates our bureaucracy too.

 

Therefore, it's not just one cog that's the problem, it's the whole system. What we need is a small period of military rule and then a return to democracy, wherefore the system would be cleansed.

[Nemo]

Agreed thats the main thing I love about democracy.But according to me its cons are a major threat to humanity and thats why we need a 'Hybrid' type of government giving equal importance to immidiate and future needs.Democracy does immidiate but doesnt do future

 

and what do you propose as alternative ? a dictatorship ? monarchy ? what about the cons there ? in democracy people have the chance to over throw the incumbent government if its unsatisfactory.

 

Look at china, its no secrete how its been going about its business, do you want that kind of a government to rule you ?

[ColorCodePurple]

and what do you propose as alternative ? a dictatorship ? monarchy ? what about the cons there ? in democracy people have the chance to over throw the incumbent government if its unsatisfactory.

 

Look at china, its no secrete how its been going about its business, do you want that kind of a government to rule you ?

It is one of my beliefs that Nothing stands the test of time that is why there Monarchy,dictatorship,etc stood for sevral centurys before being overthrown.It is a natural law that things become old and in the case of old things they become a virus.We require new stuff-Fresh ideas and fresh people.In the case of Deocracy with time the cons have outweighed the pro's and why? because of resources which is essential for our life.

 

We need people to live not to fight over the right of life.

 

Birth control sadly is the only way for this-There is an alternative though which I only hint at in my articles because its too eccentric

[godspeed4476]

And thats why I need your help.Sorry for asking you to type.But tell me why my views are faulty

 

Main reason why I have posted my views in an online forum is because I can get intrested people to tell me their view and I adjust my views after studying your own.Its how I learn

 

The opening sentence is misguiding. In state and central government decisions, the concept of simple majority does not work. i.e, 51 cannot take the rights of 49. browse through your civic textbook your will know the exact figure.

 

Raj thakeray was neither the 1st person and nor will be the last to target so called outsiders. Such incidents have happened against people from south and north previously too, and the only reason why government does not take any action not coz of harm it will get but because of benefit it is deriving from the action. previous congress government did it to break the communist popularity in 1960-70's by not taking strict action against sena. and the current government did it to win the elections by dividing the sons of the soil mandate, and they reaped its benefits too. The government which should have loss cause of the major factors like power shortage and farmers suicide, won the elections comfortably. and if you look at the voting trend the presence of raj thakeray hurt the sena and bjp in a huge way.

 

What if that unnamed politician abuses that power to deploy 10000 policemen for his own benefit. Did you see what mulayam singh did during his tenure in UP. there were official rate cards for the police officers posts in UP.

 

 

you talk as if dictatorship is a good thing and democracy gives rise to selfishness. you try to portray the instability of dictatorship as positive thing. what good has the frequent over throw of government did for somalia. and what good have dictatorship governments in pakistan did for their country. u have saddam , fidel and other dictators who have done no good.

 

have you seen how human rights are thrashed in dictatorships. how would you feel if a doctor tries to chemically castrate you and says that its good for the country while doing it. something similiar was done by sanjay gandhi on trial basis in UP, there were reports of unmarried men being castrated forcibly to meet the quotas.

[jDaMn]

(making a reply for the second post,just have to see how I can explain some of your points )

 

By the way thanks to both of you for the reviews

Few people have the patience to string a hundred words together on their own, let alone close to a thousand. You've also chosen to discuss something that is important (but will probably just be skimmed over by most people on the forum). Good signs

 

But you don't need to explain yourself - it's not a debate. You asked for feedback, not a discussion on the 'essay topic'. I'm more interested in what you are focusing on - good writing or persuasion (not that they can't go together)? You can improve on both - I'm sure you'll 'get' there (as far as writing is concerned) just by writing/reading more. As for the argument side of things, you need a lot of work:

 

1. Simplify your style - make the whole thing more like a conversation. Give people a very good idea of what you are talking about, why it is important, and what your stand is. Then lead them step by step through your arguments (arguments, NOT examples). Finally, make sure they do understand what you have been trying to say. Repeat yourself if necessary.

 

2. Get a good grip on the subject matter first - almost none of the threads here involve as much thought as you seem to have put into your work. Why not take that last step to really stand out? Research the topic, draft, write and then publish. Don't depend on the edit button (just saying, not implying that you edit a lot).

 

Critique your own work as well (sometimes it helps to imagine that someone else wrote the piece, to gain a little more objectivity). Would you be persuaded by the 'essay' if you were neutral/biased the other way?

 

Again, well done, we don't normally see things like this outside of IVG authors/Write for us.

 

Btw it's good to see people discussing it now, maybe we need a thread for something like this

[ColorCodePurple]

The opening sentence is misguiding. In state and central government decisions, the concept of simple majority does not work. i.e, 51 cannot take the rights of 49. browse through your civic textbook your will know the exact figure.

 

Raj thakeray was neither the 1st person and nor will be the last to target so called outsiders. Such incidents have happened against people from south and north previously too, and the only reason why government does not take any action not coz of harm it will get but because of benefit it is deriving from the action. previous congress government did it to break the communist popularity in 1960-70's by not taking strict action against sena. and the current government did it to win the elections by dividing the sons of the soil mandate, and they reaped its benefits too. The government which should have loss cause of the major factors like power shortage and farmers suicide, won the elections comfortably. and if you look at the voting trend the presence of raj thakeray hurt the sena and bjp in a huge way.

 

What if that unnamed politician abuses that power to deploy 10000 policemen for his own benefit. Did you see what mulayam singh did during his tenure in UP. there were official rate cards for the police officers posts in UP.

you talk as if dictatorship is a good thing and democracy gives rise to selfishness. you try to portray the instability of dictatorship as positive thing. what good has the frequent over throw of government did for somalia. and what good have dictatorship governments in pakistan did for their country. u have saddam , fidel and other dictators who have done no good.

 

have you seen how human rights are thrashed in dictatorships. how would you feel if a doctor tries to chemically castrate you and says that its good for the country while doing it. something similiar was done by sanjay gandhi on trial basis in UP, there were reports of unmarried men being castrated forcibly to meet the quotas.

I agree completely but The alternative of democracy is not always dictatorship as I say we need the pros of democracy-for certain but we need to also make a system of government which manages to eliminate its cons as well.Yes I associate democracy with selfishness because democracy is driven by humans and humans in general are selfish it is a foundation characteristic of not just humans but all organic beings in the universe.Animals can afford to be selfish because they are too few and too underdevloped but selfish, advanced, numerous human beings pose a danger to earth and humanity (in increasing order of importance) (the exceptions being great people whom I litrally worship i.e Mahatma Ghandi).

 

 

Few people have the patience to string a hundred words together on their own, let alone close to a thousand. You've also chosen to discuss something that is important (but will probably just be skimmed over by most people on the forum). Good signs

 

But you don't need to explain yourself - it's not a debate. You asked for feedback, not a discussion on the 'essay topic'. I'm more interested in what you are focusing on - good writing or persuasion (not that they can't go together)? You can improve on both - I'm sure you'll 'get' there (as far as writing is concerned) just by writing/reading more. As for the argument side of things, you need a lot of work:

 

1. Simplify your style - make the whole thing more like a conversation. Give people a very good idea of what you are talking about, why it is important, and what your stand is. Then lead them step by step through your arguments (arguments, NOT examples). Finally, make sure they do understand what you have been trying to say. Repeat yourself if necessary.

 

2. Get a good grip on the subject matter first - almost none of the threads here involve as much thought as you seem to have put into your work. Why not take that last step to really stand out? Research the topic, draft, write and then publish. Don't depend on the edit button (just saying, not implying that you edit a lot).

 

Critique your own work as well (sometimes it helps to imagine that someone else wrote the piece, to gain a little more objectivity). Would you be persuaded by the 'essay' if you were neutral/biased the other way?

 

Again, well done, we don't normally see things like this outside of IVG authors/Write for us.

 

Btw it's good to see people discussing it now, maybe we need a thread for something like this

I had two main intentions of posting in the forums one was my writing and the other was my belief-Believe me I cant get this sort of disscusion anywhere except here.In school people/teachers are too busy at home views are a little biased towards me,my friends dont seem to care

 

For 1:I actually want to do that,One of the authour whose book I read frequently does that masterfully (Isaac Asimov if you'v heard about him)

 

For 2: again agreed.All this work is actually my own thoughts and none of it is researched,I try to correct it in times when my articles are actually needed for say some competitions etc.Although this thread is an exception as I have been editing my posts to accommodate multiple replys (I had seen your reply after I replyed to godspeed whos reply I had completed before dinner,and posted it after dinner)

 

for 3: I do,do that after the final draft is complete helps me a lot in ironing bugs out.

 

 

Thankee

[Nemo]

I agree completely but The alternative of democracy is not always dictatorship as I say we need the pros of democracy-for certain but we need to also make a system of government which manages to eliminate its cons as well.Yes I associate democracy with selfishness because democracy is driven by humans and humans in general are selfish it is a foundation characteristic of not just humans but all organic beings in the universe.Animals can afford to be selfish because they are too few and too underdevloped but selfish, advanced, numerous human beings pose a danger to earth and humanity (in increasing order of importance) (the exceptions being great people whom I litrally worship i.e Mahatma Ghandi).

 

 

so that will be a 'flaw' in each and every system going by your analogy.

unless...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

but even that became selfish

[godspeed4476]

but even that became selfish

rightly said........but give tht guy a break he is still a kid.