LaZyVigiLaNtE Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 amir khan in dhoom....hahaha...too short. yep..many said it and i agree. doesn't matter if u r the best actor in the world... some characters demand a certain body type/personality owing to their established trademarkesque legacy. you say dhoom you visualize tall hunks...amir doesn't fit the role. too short... ...also did I say he's too short?..yup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentassassin Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 (edited) So criminals are all tall ?? Edited September 6, 2013 by silentassassin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 you say dhoom you visualize tall hunks...amir doesn't fit the role. too short... No, only you visualise tall hunks. Secondly, dhoom; Having legacy? lulz wut? Thirdly, Marky Mark Whalberg played max Payne, tom cruise has done stuff like collateral. Both were convincing and are barely an inch taller than AK (if at all). If dhoom is really about bikes then it shouldnt really matter how long the legs riding them, are. We arent talking fisticuffs (though AK would wtf own abhishek in real life), but shenanigans on bikes and some badly choreographed gun fights. Height doesnt really play any role in that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heaven Angel Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 Vin Diesel in Guardians of the Galaxy. He will play Groot. Vin Diesel: “From That Moment On, I Was Groot,” Teases More Marvel Movieshttp://comicbook.com/blog/2013/09/05/vin-diesel-from-that-moment-on-i-was-groot-teases-more-marvel-movies/He also discusses his role with Marvel, and the idea that there’s…something…coming in 2016 that he’s going to be a part of. Could it be a Guardians of the Galaxy sequel so soon? Well, he actually sort of makes it sound like it’s something else entirely, and the Guardians was done in part to quell the question of why he hadn’t teamed up with Marvel yet.“Team up,” being an interesting phrase since he calls the next big thing a “merging of brands.” Hmm…! Guardians of the Galaxy hits theaters on August 1.Avengers 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 ^^ isnt Bradley cooper playing the raccoon type creature in gotg ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Boss Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 raccoon type creature in gotg ? You mean Rocket Racoon. He is voice actor for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 yeah him. thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heaven Angel Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 ^^Yep. Rocket Raccoon voice.Amazing cast so far:Vin DieselZoe SaldanaBradley CooperKaren Gillan <3Chris PrattDave Bautista -> BatistaLee PaceBenicio Del ToroJohn C. Reilly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 I loved Aamir in Sarfarosh, that movie was brilliant. I think his worst movie was 3 idiots, I hated it even more for the molestation of a perfect novel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 (edited) how is the new Riddick ? read a review in times of india. a woman (yes am being sexist: women should NEVER review manly movies, they just dont and cannot get it) gave it 2.5/5 and said it had nothing except gratuitous violence, curse words aimed at women and homos. Then she wrote that it was not surprising as the previous riddick movie was (notice 'was' ie she didnt even mention Pitch black- she doesnt even know the whole lore ) nothing good either. Then i called her a ho and burnt the paper. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/movie-reviews/english/Riddick-movie-review/movie-review/22325581.cms?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=toimoviereview bitches be crazy _ Edited September 6, 2013 by Nemo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Boss Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 lol Nemo why bother with TOI for any movie review? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 vo saamne pada tha. had gone out to some one'd home for dinner. shitty food so had to occupy myself elsewhere :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 +1 And they didn't even give bhagat the proper credit. Hirani had the balls to say that the movie had only like 5% resemblance to the novel. Complete BS. he isn't rolling with the right production housesHe should go to vishal bhardwaj or anurag kashyap not the hipsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solitaire Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 how is the new Riddick ? read a review in times of india. a woman (yes am being sexist: women should NEVER review manly movies, they just dont and cannot get it) gave it 2.5/5 and said it had nothing except gratuitous violence, curse words aimed at women and homos. Then she wrote that it was not surprising as the previous riddick movie was (notice 'was' ie she didnt even mention Pitch black- she doesnt even know the whole lore ) nothing good either. Then i called her a ho and burnt the paper. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/movie-reviews/english/Riddick-movie-review/movie-review/22325581.cms?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=toimoviereview bitches be crazy _ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wolfy among us Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 I loved Aamir in Sarfarosh, that movie was brilliant. I think his worst movie was 3 idiots, I hated it even more for the molestation of a perfect novel. lolwut? this "novel" is the shittiest piece of literature i've ever read. Well, until 2 states came out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bird Bird Bird Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 how is the new Riddick ? read a review in times of india. a woman (yes am being sexist: women should NEVER review manly movies, they just dont and cannot get it) gave it 2.5/5 and said it had nothing except gratuitous violence, curse words aimed at women and homos. Then she wrote that it was not surprising as the previous riddick movie was (notice 'was' ie she didnt even mention Pitch black- she doesnt even know the whole lore ) nothing good either. Then i called her a ho and burnt the paper. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/movie-reviews/english/Riddick-movie-review/movie-review/22325581.cms?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=toimoviereview bitches be crazy _ Sadly the review resonates it's rating at RT (and pretty much everywhere online). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 (edited) ok, for the last time, RT's rating is much more than the face value. I am sure you know how they rate stuff. They dont review any movie themselves, instead they just compile reviews from myriad (and credible- like reputed websites and newspapers) sources and give the movie a fresh or rotten rating depending on how many people liked it, vis a vis dont who did not. So a 90% review and 62 % score (60 is their benchmark for fresh iirc) by two reviewers will make the movie get 2 fresh ratings while a 12% and 58 % scores will get it 2 rotten ratings. Can you see the potential for opaque RT scores then ? And yeah i agree with you about the sad state of affairs when such badass manly movies get bogged down by ghei, ostensibly chick flicks' standards of judging movies _ Edited September 7, 2013 by Nemo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThE JuGgErNaUT Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 (edited) I wasn't really expecting 4 stars for a Riddick movie now, were you nemo? other 2 were just about ok. thats all. should be a decent timepass, nothing more. EDIT : & nothing less Edited September 7, 2013 by ThE JuGgErNaUT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThE JuGgErNaUT Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 (edited) Nice! just hope they don't go overboard with the 'emotions' & the feelings & crap it up like they previous gen, or the gay spiderman played by maguire Also, maybe they could beef him up a bit, looks like a female robocop in some clips Edited September 7, 2013 by ThE JuGgErNaUT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dylanjosh Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 ok, for the last time, RT's rating is much more than the face value. I am sure you know how they rate stuff. They dont review any movie themselves, instead they just compile reviews from myriad (and credible- like reputed websites and newspapers) sources and give the movie a fresh or rotten rating depending on how many people liked it, vis a vis dont who did not. So a 90% review and 62 % score (60 is their benchmark for fresh iirc) by two reviewers will make the movie get 2 fresh ratings while a 12% and 58 % scores will get it 2 rotten ratings. Can you see the potential for opaque RT scores then ? And yeah i agree with you about the sad state of affairs when such badass manly movies get bogged down by ghei, ostensibly chick flicks' standards of judging movies _ Why are you so bothered of what someone else thinks of the movie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts