Jump to content

The Football Thread


Xeno

Recommended Posts

50 million.. pfft. the latest is 40 million + studman, which i feel is high unless its studman for loan.

tbh i would pin torres at 40 million flat. 35 + studman/anelka and we have got a deal.

 

Torres leaving pool is inevitable, its up to the management at anfield to decide what to do, cash on torres now and use it to build a squad, adams, conentrao etc and hope to catch sunderland or keep torres forcibly, making him sulk and selling him in summer for a far less price. coming 24 hours are gonna be very interesting.

 

 

ON LIKE......

Edited by Nemo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont go torres u r back to ur best.Whats the point of having suarez then,we signed suarez because we needed good striking force.If torres leaves we will again be having only one striker world class striker up front .DONT GO TORRES.please please please.If torres goes in jan gerrard,kuyt,pepe will all go in summer.Then who would we play with.

Edited by hope
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 million.. pfft. the latest is 40 million + studman, which i feel is high unless its studman for loan.

tbh i would pin torres at 40 million flat. 35 + studman/anelka and we have got a deal.

 

Torres leaving pool is inevitable, its up to the management at anfield to decide what to do, cash on torres now and use it to build a squad, adams, conentrao etc and hope to catch sunderland or keep torres forcibly, making him sulk and selling him in summer for a far less price. coming 24 hours are gonna be very interesting.

 

 

ON LIKE......

 

Roman has gone crazy.... It seems he doesn't use his brain when it comes to football... He is lining up a 60 million pound bid... is he crazy or just an idiot???

1st shevchenko failed, now torres might as well... with a huge price tag comes huge pressure and responsibility on the player... its a fukin gamble and we have faced the worse of it already...

I dont want Chelsea to spend blindly on Torres, especially when his contract has a buy-out clause of 50mil... let this season fail, but prepare for the future transfers in a more logical & financial way... go for lukaku, go for hazard, go for sanchez, go for pato (& David Luiz :doh:)... but, 40+ million on a player does not seem logical in any way... its stupidity.. unless its a ronaldo or a messi...

Edited by Madhav
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roman has gone crazy.... It seems he doesn't use his brain when it comes to football... He is lining up a 60 million pound bid... is he crazy or just an idiot???

1st shevchenko failed, now torres might as well... with a huge price tag comes huge pressure and responsibility on the player... its a fukin gamble and we have faced the worse of it already...

I dont want Chelsea to spend blindly on Torres, especially when his contract has a buy-out clause of 50mil... let this season fail, but prepare for the future transfers in a more logical & financial way... go for lukaku, go for hazard, go for sanchez, go for pato (& David Luiz :doh:)... but, 40+ million on a player does not seem logical in any way... its stupidity.. unless its a ronaldo or a messi...

 

Torres is a proven talent in the EPL . He s young(ish) and a absolute terror for defenders as long he gets the service . This is the kind of buy that we need. No more unproven players . We need players who are used to playing in the EPL. I rather have cahill than luiz anyday for chelsea.

Overseas players take loads of time to adapt which in turn can prove costly for bigger clubs challenging for the title .

 

90 million for ronaldo . 20 mill for bent . Torres deserves that price . Its a inflated market . Ramires too was close to 20 million . Approx figures :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Torres is a proven talent in the EPL . He s young(ish) and a absolute terror for defenders as long he gets the service . This is the kind of buy that we need. No more unproven players . We need players who are used to playing in the EPL. I rather have cahill than luiz anyday for chelsea.

Overseas players take loads of time to adapt which in turn can prove costly for bigger clubs challenging for the title .

 

90 million for ronaldo . 20 mill for bent . Torres deserves that price . Its a inflated market . Ramires too was close to 20 million . Approx figures :P

No sorry, 60mill is no justified price for a striker who has had his highs and lows in the past... and who is injury prone... Its ridiculous if yu think Chelsea should splash 60mil on him... for that price, we could buy 3 Darren Bents... how is is it justified for one Fernando Torres...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he just needs to pull out his chequebook and buy an adaptive striker for your needs. Liverpool shouldn't be your shopping ground try some other clubs lol

 

Personally I want that Utrecht striker to come play for us because the boy has crazy legs, knows how to switch with the midfield man and he has a knack for pulling defenders out and leaving slots for midfielders to run amok. Plus he's dutch so that helps and he would be cheap.

Edited by Mel81x
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing like torres to replace our ageing frontline if it happens .

 

Harry aint an idiot whose bidding for Andy Carroll... and that too justified 25.... why not him???? tell me one good reason (other than newcastle's reluctance) and I won't argue..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I want that Utrecht striker to come play for us because the boy has crazy legs, knows how to switch with the midfield man and he has a knack for pulling defenders out and leaving slots for midfielders to run amok. Plus he's dutch so that helps and he would be cheap.

I have a very, very strong feeling that he is gonna be a gunner soon...

 

Arsene has his own ways....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have a huge man crush on fernando torres, to me, on his day and with fitness he is the best striker in the PL along with drogba. Been a fan of goldilocks for the past 2 years. His ability should not be questioned by anyone, lest a chelsea fan for he reserves his special performance against us (0-2 at anfield was not that long ago); that being said, 60 mill is ludicrous for him. Specially when he can be brought in summer at a far lower price.

 

40 million or 35 million + a player will be the the best imo as of now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harry aint an idiot whose bidding for Andy Carroll... and that too justified 25.... why not him???? tell me one good reason (other than newcastle's reluctance) and I won't argue..

 

are we comparing carroll and torres :unsure:

 

 

Carroll is good no doubt but torres is better .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...