aRch-0n Posted June 18, 2011 Report Share Posted June 18, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Tigre Chino Posted June 18, 2011 Report Share Posted June 18, 2011 Saw that on Kotaku. Gj Dice/EA you know you're in trouble when you have to stoop down to 4chan's levels to promote your game You're thinking of /b/ .. Rest of 4chan is fairly knowledgeable bout sh*t and stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praveer Posted June 18, 2011 Report Share Posted June 18, 2011 You're thinking of /b/ .. Rest of 4chan is fairly knowledgeable bout sh*t and stuff. /b/ is pretty much where all the filth is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pushy Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 that dinosaur one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteWolf Posted June 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 Battlefield 3: 30FPS on Consoles, Dice Explains Why 60FPS Not Possible When asked if the PS3 version would be 60FPS, Dice’s Johan Andersson replied: No we always do 30 fps on consoles, not possible to fit in vehicles, fx, scale and all players otherwise. http://www.examiner.com/video-game-in-national/battlefield-3-30fps-on-consoles-not-possible-to-fit-everything-otherwise Confirmed: No 1080p For Battlefield 3 On Consoles, PS3 Footage Is Latest Build http://www.gamesthirst.com/2011/06/18/confirmed-no-1080p-for-battlefield-3-on-consoles-ps3-footage-is-latest-build/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karooo Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 No 1080 p for console, wtf developers sold out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pushy Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 damn straight yo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RV1709 Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 It looks like a (slightly) better Medal of Honor in that PS3 footage. I can see why they had to keep console footage under wraps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzz Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 It looks like a (slightly) better Medal of Honor in that PS3 footage. I can see why they had to keep console footage under wraps Really? MoH looked sh*t on consoles and not only graphics animation specially destruction is far superior that MoH. BF3 looks far better on console to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabba Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 frostbite 2.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sackboy Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 looks pretty good there one of the best looking conslol games IMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeehunter Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 Looks very bad on consoles . But it will till look better than MW3 PC Version . Now will have to buy a new PC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindoctor Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 No we always do 30 fps on consoles, not possible to fit in vehicles, fx, scale and all players otherwise. so what he's basically saying is that apart from looking like sh*t on the consolols, it runs like sh*t too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RV1709 Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 so what he's basically saying is that apart from looking like sh*t on the consolols, it runs like sh*t too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aftrunner Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 So looks worse, runs worse, has less number of people online therefore plays worse and costs more than twice as much. Hey I guess dabba and the other idiots were right. Console gaming is where its at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarbonCore Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 so what he's basically saying is that apart from looking like sh*t on the consolols, it runs like sh*t too? Or that the other 60fps game won't have vehicles, epic scale battles or high player count Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
montylee Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 @Afty it costs twice on consoles in India only. In US there's only $10 price difference between pc and console games -------------------------------------------- Sent from keyboard using dirty hands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricky87 Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 Its good to see developers focusing on the PC and making it their lead platform, these consoles are just expensive useless crap. Its ridiculous to see the hate brigade, realize already please that PC is superior in every way, I bet you would not have complained if PC also got 32 players instead of 64 eh? On one you say MW 3 is going to drown BF 3 and then complain about not getting the same deal for consoles, you dont even deserve a BF 3 on consoles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devil_angel Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 @Afty it costs twice on consoles in India only. In US there's only $10 price difference between pc and console games -------------------------------------------- Sent from keyboard using dirty hands I see you are from India. So, what's your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindoctor Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 Or that the other 60fps game won't have vehicles, epic scale battles or high player count yea i'm sure the lollerfield fans will absolutely love watching the vehicles and epic scale battles framing across their screens at miserable frame rates i'm surprised no one has busted out the 'life is 22fps so we don't need more' argument yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.