CM Sunny Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 I am creating my own damn company give me A.Raja's mobile no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Django_3101 Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 bhai, if you plan to play practice matches within your clan, invite me too. if any of you want to improve your kdr, please put me in the opposition team. For that, please invite me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 @Team D Sam is available only after 11 on Sunday, so we won't be able to have two matches. So lets either play tonight as previously scheduled or if that is not at all possible then maybe postpone our match this week to next weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aRch-0n Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 I think we can't play today..sa isn't available Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 So, next week then? Is that allowed Dan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDribbler Posted February 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 week 2 matches have to wind up before end of sunday... No pushing to the third week. If u guys have plyr less.. mutually agree and play 4v4 etc... but this week's matches have to wind before Sunday ends... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 Ok, then we are ready to play a 4vs4 either tonight during the previously scheduled time or tomorrow at 10 pm. Team D please confirm as soon as possible which one you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CM Sunny Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 SA is our main pro player & leader only you are his equivalent you know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 ok, so I guess lets forget about tonight. We can play the match tomorrow around 10 as a 4vs4 then. After 11 we have a match with Rash's team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CM Sunny Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 I see no problem in that but I can't say let the others confirmed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aRch-0n Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 4vs4 ? Why's that ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parvinder Singh Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 @Noctis, you should hv informed this earlier abt Sam's unavailability on sunday. Since all this was decided earlier, thats y sa decided to go ahead with his personal commitments on saturday. Now that he is not available, you r informing abt sam's unavailibility and want to hv a match on saturday rightway when sa is not there to attend. Ezio hit the nail on the head by asking you to miss the match in place of sa from our side, if balance has to be maintained. You backed out straight away from this offer, and you want us to drop one player from our team for sunday's match. Why should we do that? although even if we play as 5, our dc kings would make sure its not 5v5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 @Noctis, you should hv informed this earlier abt Sam's unavailability on sunday. Since all this was decided earlier, thats y sa decided to go ahead with his personal commitments on saturday. Now that he is not available, you r informing abt sam's unavailibility and want to hv a match on saturday rightway when sa is not there to attend. Why should we do that? Check back a few pages. Ive told several times that we wanted to play on Sat, even team D swapping places with someone else was fine too. In the end when everyone was absolutely not willing to play on sat, we said would try two matches on Sunday, never confirmed it. Since our team was willing from the start to play at the scheduled timings, which was changed for others convenience, now a 4vs4 is the only option if it is to take place this week. Ezio hit the nail on the head by asking you to miss the match in place of sa from our side, if balance has to be maintained. You backed out straight away from this offer, and you want us to drop one player from our team for sunday's match. Where did he ask me that and when did I refuse? I didn't even see a post from him about something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aRch-0n Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 Umm Okay So IIRC we never ever had a 5 man squad, and that IMO no offence to any of the teams, did not make any one drop a player so why is a 4vs4 clause over here ? Its a tourney for fun in anycase, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parvinder Singh Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 Where did he ask me that and when did I refuse? I didn't even see a post from him about something like that. Here Ok, then we are ready to play a 4vs4 either tonight during the previously scheduled time or tomorrow at 10 pm. Team D please confirm as soon as possible which one you want. SA is our main pro player & leader only you are his equivalent you know ok, so I guess lets forget about tonight. We can play the match tomorrow around 10 as a 4vs4 then. After 11 we have a match with Rash's team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 Umm Okay So IIRC we never ever had a 5 man squad, and that IMO no offence to any of the teams, did not make any one drop a player so why is a 4vs4 clause over here ? Its a tourney for fun in anycase, Its because those players did not attend the match after it was fixed. In this case Team A wants to play on sat, which was the scheduled time too btw, but team D does not agree. Team D wants to play on sun, but team A does not agree. Since its not a fault with any particular team, only solution is a mutual compromise now, which will be a 4vs4 match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadridistaLove Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 Very true..1st game..we played 4vs5..we lost 4-3.. Yesterday,4vs5..which became 3vs5 later..we lost again! We have suffered enough coz of dcs..playing 4vs4 and leaving one of our players out is a violation of rules and unfair! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 Here So saying "You are equivalent to SA" is the same as "We will play a 4vs4 with you tonight if you drop out?" Ezio made it clear that he had no authority to fix a match, if he made a proper proposition then we would have considered it. We have suffered enough coz of dcs..playing 4vs4 and leaving one of our players out is a violation of rules and unfair! Violation of which rule? This is proposed by Dan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aRch-0n Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 Its because those players did not attend the match after it was fixed. In this case Team A wants to play on sat, which was the scheduled time too btw, but team D does not agree. Team D wants to play on sun, but team A does not agree. Since its not a fault with any particular team, only solution is a mutual compromise now, which will be a 4vs4 match. so it is a "will" eh ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 ^None of that matters, as it was after the matches were fixed. This is just about setting a time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.