Maximus Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 We are at it again. Full HD is to be surpassed by Ultra HD (4 times better than HD) with 4096X2160 resolution. Sony PS3 would support 4K stills, not video (update coming early 2012) Toshiba announces 4K, glasses free 3DTV So, we can assume the next generation of gaming consoles will provide for Ultra HD Gaming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhpian Bali Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 Woah .. That is impressive. Wonder when will we get to experience it first hand. Going to be a blast experiencing gaming on a 4k TV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sackboy Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 Umm I guess that crosses the max. DPI That our eye can sense ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameAnalyzer Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigsaw Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 Umm I guess that crosses the max. DPI That our eye can sense ? that's called Rectum Retina display Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playstation Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 Umm I guess that crosses the max. DPI That our eye can sense ? yes i heard this current high hd is most a human eye can actually see...infact hard to even find difference between 720p and 1080p sometimes... that's called Rectum Retina display unkle aapko toh chasma ka power change karna parega... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playstation Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 dp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Boss Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 infact hard to even find difference between 720p and 1080p sometimes Mostly you can differentiate in games. In movies also you can see the differences, but not quit easily as the games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shantz Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 Umm I guess that crosses the max. DPI That our eye can sense ? No. Firstly, DPI is a term used for print media. For monitors, TVs etc, correct terminology is PPI. In any case, even with 4k pixels, a 32" TV will have a PPI of ~140. For a 32" TV, the recommended viewing distance is around 4-5 feet, for which the eye resolution is slightly higher than this. With bigger TV sizes, we tend to sit farther but the PPI is also dropping then. The maximum recommended viewing angle is around 30 degress, which means that we can have upto 30*60/0.3 = 6000 pixels in the horizontal direction. So we are still not hitting the limit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devil_angel Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 As far as next gen gaming is concerned, all we need is detail in the graphics. The current resolution is good enough. This is the reason why we find devs compromising even on 720P resolution to get the graphical details in their games these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shantz Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 Also, reminds me of this: (We will be doing the same 10 years from now with current 1080p tv sets ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avkash Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 always rely on Shantz to help you out in technical terms Also the difference between 720p and 1080p is easily seen if you have bigger screens, in smaller screens it is difficult to notice, in fact I can only notice difference between 720p and 1080p Avatar prints that I have because I have seen the visuals many times on the same screen, Edit, in fact the bigger iMac is already at 1.8 times the full HD, so a display like that is not a big deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shantz Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 always rely on Shantz to help you out in technical terms Also the difference between 720p and 1080p is easily seen if you have bigger screens, in smaller screens it is difficult to notice, in fact I can only notice difference between 720p and 1080p Avatar prints that I have because I have seen the visuals many times on the same screen, Edit, in fact the bigger iMac is already at 1.8 times the full HD, so a display like that is not a big deal Yeah the 27" display they have is like around 109 PPI.. Most TVs max out around 72-75 and most of the common monitors max out around 80-90 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death Stryke Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 The 720p 1080p no difference argument definitely holds water for screen sizes below 40". Above that, u start noticing a little more sharpness in the 1080p movie. But, in most cases, unless u know it is actually 720p, you probably wont notice. Its just like that image shantz posted above Placebo effect is the term i believe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigsaw Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 Umm I guess that crosses the max. DPI That our eye can sense ? That's what Steve she said Had to say it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avkash Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 The 720p 1080p no difference argument definitely holds water for screen sizes below 40". Above that, u start noticing a little more sharpness in the 1080p movie. But, in most cases, unless u know it is actually 720p, you probably wont notice. Its just like that image shantz posted above Placebo effect is the term i believe? yup above 40 is where you actually begin to admire the Blu-ray Full HD format, till 40 even 720p rips look good enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.