Jump to content

Assassin's Creed III


WhiteWolf

Recommended Posts

Mass Effect 3

 

Have not played Mass Effect 3 so will not pass any judgement.

 

 

Did it involve Shepard turning into a Roman candle at the end so that the crew of the Normandy could get away?

 

If yes, then it is equally bad. Otherwise you are welcome to spoil it for me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^Lot of crap involved in ending. They even tried to fix it by selling "ending" as DLC.

 

 

0 to 1,749 EMS: Your only choice is to destroy the Reapers. Earth is destroyed.

1,750 to 1,899 EMS: Shepard can choose to destroy the Reapers, or control them. If you destroy the Reapers, Earth is destroyed in the process as well. If you control the Reapers, Earth is devastated but not destroyed.

1,900 to 2,349 EMS: Shepard can choose between destroying and controlling Reapers. Both choices save earth, and humanity survives, however Earth's buildings still get vaporized.

2,350 to 2,649 EMS: Shepard can control Reapers, and save Earth

2,650 to 2,799 EMS: Shepard can destroy Reapers, and save Earth. Shepard Dies.

2,800 to 3,999 EMS: Shepard is able to create a link between Synthetics and Organics, and Earth and the Galaxy are saved

4,000 to 4,999 EMS: You can destroy the Reapers and Earth is saved. If you shot TIM on time and saved Anderson, Shepard breathes (Survives).

5,000+ EMS: You can destroy all Reapers. Earth saved as well. Shepard will breath, whether you attempted to save Anderson or not. (Perfect Ending)

 

For more info: http://www.rarityguide.com/articles/articles/1739/1/Mass-Effect-3-Endings-Guide---HEAVY-SPOILERS/Page1.html

 

 

Plus, users are FORCED to play multiplayer in-order to get proper ending and more EMS.

 

ME3 was good and fun to play unlike AC3. AC3 was total disappointment.

(all those trailers...damm, game was nothing really like it).

 

/OT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AC3 is definition of Terrible AAA game:-

Pathetic Protagonist, haytem owns him big time.

Lukewarm OST,ya Kyd is missed big time.

Lost focus on stealth.

Bad and boring missions,with ultra rigid design.

America as a setting looks dull and boring.The atmospheric effects are good,but cannot elevate the bland environment.

Under use or irrelevant game mechs,such as Tree climbing,pathetic homestead,weapons like rope darts and guns(Yes the bullcrap loading times)

ending that wants to kill UBI on the whole.

 

The only +ev parts of the Game:-

Haytem Kenway,the guy is pure bond material and yes his view and ideas cannot be called wrong.

Navel Battles - only abt 20-25 mins of the game,but they are rock solid good.

Desmond missions,again another 30 mins or so of good gameplay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even I didn't like the game but the game mechs were decent. It was terrible when compared to other AC games, but probably not the "definition" of terrible AAA games.

 

When you have an economic angle that makes no sense, hunting and skinning mechanics that do not contribute anything save raw material for the same then something is awfully wrong with the mechanics.

 

I would say Assassin's Creed III suffers almost all the problems that the original Creed suffered. Insufficiently exposited titular lead, lots of mechanics (that quickly become repetitive) and an ending which leaves a ponderous question mark on the proceedings (magnified in III because this was supposed to be THE END).

 

There were points where III took the lead as well but that was not sufficient in my opinion to see the Roman candle sequence at the end of everything. I would rather have that happened at the end of the first title instead of keeping at the edge like this time.

 

Also, lets not get the optimisation and DLC aspect to the fore. -_-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll have to agree with LightUTSaber. The only point I don't agree is Desmond missions. I was hoping for something better than what they gave. If you've been following the comics and such, you'll know there was lots of potential there.

 

Can't believe how they wasted Daniel Cross. Easily one of the best characters from the AC univserse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll have to agree with LightUTSaber. The only point I don't agree is Desmond missions. I was hoping for something better than what they gave. If you've been following the comics and such, you'll know there was lots of potential there.

 

Can't believe how they wasted Daniel Cross. Easily one of the best characters from the AC univserse.

Ya daniel cross was wasted by a long shot,the reason i said those were good cause i kind of enjoyed the first parkour mission and the last one where we finally see desmond taking on bad guys.

Give what garbage you have play otherwise,this is at-least something better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...