Jump to content

Battlefield 4


WhiteWolf
 Share

Which platform will you buy BF4 for?  

233 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

By when will it be tough to find a full server? Estimate

 

Sent from my Asus Zenfone 5 using Tapatalk

 

Currently there are many asian and US servers which are full during weekends..so it won't die so soon..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By when will it be tough to find a full server? Estimate

 

Depending on what you like to play, you will find the going tough even now.

 

Overall though, the player-base has stabilised. You can find decent number of games, I am a regular conquest player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you dont mind medium ping then plenty of EU servers that are usually full. Like a sh*t ton.

 

Servers should be well populated for a while as well, especially if more DLC bit is true. I mean what else are BF fans gonna move on to? Hardline? :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

kinda late ...but how do i use mantle for BF4 ? my HD 7850 2gb should support mantle right ?

 

Yes, it should support MANTLE.

 

To enable MANTLE, you will have to download the driver (or BETA) that supports MANTLE render API, then go into OPTIONS > VIDEO SETTINGS > GRAPHICS API, switch it to MANTLE from Dx 11 and restart.

 

Hope this helps, Cheerio!

If you dont mind medium ping then plenty of EU servers that are usually full. Like a sh*t ton.

 

More so to the overall quality of the servers and the number of game modes you have to play around in.

 

Several game types are really niche and you will never get a decent latency server and the one's in the EU / US may discriminate on the basis of latency.

 

Actually the total player-base of BattleField 4 is sad in the overall scope of things.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the problem i have seen with servers is that they don't balance players weil..usually one sided...and its not only BF4...was in BF3 as well...they need to figure out a proper algorithm for it...

 

Game is designed only for Conquest..rest of the modes are way unbalanced..And that damn bow they have added :rant: ...don't we have enough problems already..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More so to the overall quality of the servers and the number of game modes you have to play around in.

Several game types are really niche and you will never get a decent latency server and the one's in the EU / US may discriminate on the basis of latency.

 

I've always had plenty of choice when it comes to conquest, Rush and TDM. Those are the only things I play. Cant speak for premium maps though.

If you are playing some off the wall gametype then sure, but thats true of any game. Core gametypes are always the one with the strongest presence.

the problem i have seen with servers is that they don't balance players weil..usually one sided...and its not only BF4...was in BF3 as well...they need to figure out a proper algorithm for it...

 

Game is designed only for Conquest..rest of the modes are way unbalanced..And that damn bow they have added :rant: ...don't we have enough problems already..

 

For some reason I've found balancing to be better on the console version. Most of the games there are somewhat close fought. On the PC, its usually one team getting wrecked.

 

My theory is there are a lot more lone wolves on the console which means no one team has a significant advantage with communication. On the PC, people seem to buddy up when playing. Which means if one team gets 2-3 good squads, the other team is f**ked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

For some reason I've found balancing to be better on the console version. Most of the games there are somewhat close fought. On the PC, its usually one team getting wrecked.

 

My theory is there are a lot more lone wolves on the console which means no one team has a significant advantage with communication. On the PC, people seem to buddy up when playing. Which means if one team gets 2-3 good squads, the other team is f**ked.

 

 

I agree...i still play BF3 on ps3 and i'm a lone wolf on it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always had plenty of choice when it comes to conquest, Rush and TDM. Those are the only things I play. Cant speak for premium maps though.

If you are playing some off the wall gametype then sure, but thats true of any game. Core gametypes are always the one with the strongest presence.

 

Naah! I am talking core game modes, Rush is a terrible experience on most maps and thanks to the wayward team balance, I have a couple servers bookmarked but they are in the US or EU.

 

TDM is probably the most unsatisfying game type, it features the least amount of Teamwork vis-á-vis its title.

 

Chain link was interesting but once again difficult to find dedicated servers and team-balance is the spoil-sport.

 

And the funniest part is, most clan run servers stack the owning clan on one side irrespective of team-balance. Rampant in South-East Asia servers, I have stopped playing there for this reason.

 

Official servers are LuLz. No team-balance, no filtering, no nothing, free for all like the Delhi political scenario.

 

Although, after sinking 800 hours into the game, when it is a good game, it is good game.

Edited by ALPHA17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...