Shantz Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 Simple that we need n environment suitable to our body temp, both land & water are affected differently by changing seasons. Just a theory, anyhoo enough OT MIND... BLOWN... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 There was enough space for survival, wasn't there? How would they come out of water anyway? That was the state of survival for everyone. Inside the water. For all plants and animals. Was it that plants came out first, started appearing on land and organisms followed? Survival is not a very fitting answer for me. @Coffee I don't get what you mean by that. yes. plants did come on land before animals did. one thing apart from the regular 'survival' theory is that due to photosynthesis, land and its atmosphere became heavily oxidised and some species those who werent averse to more oxygen, rather prefered more oxygen, began moving land wards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shantz Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 yes. plants did come on land before animals did. one thing apart from the regular 'survival' theory is that due to photosynthesis, land and its atmosphere became heavily oxidised and some species those who werent averse to more oxygen, rather prefered more oxygen, began moving land wards. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarishProGamer Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 Am I in right thread!!! Ye kahan se Land/Plants Photosynthesis.. aa gaya hai! Arey bhai tumlog jao thread chodke aur Chemistry Padho! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 wut ? nothing has been proved yet but it is one of the theory, which btw is more plausible than 90% of the bhoot stories here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 and.. Shantz and gameroftheyear, what is with Chemistry posts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shantz Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 wut ? nothing has been proved yet but it is one of the theory, which btw is more plausible than 90% of the bhoot stories here This is supernatural thread. We don't want plausible. Plausible is OT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shantz Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 and.. Shantz and gameroftheyear, what is with Chemistry posts ask bori ke ladke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 bori ka ladka choti choti baaton mein gussa kha kar a*s f**k kar dene mein yakeen karya hai tum hi batao. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarishProGamer Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 and.. Shantz and gameroftheyear, what is with Chemistry posts Don't involve me.. Its between Shantz & avkash... I came here expecting any new Ghost related story or incident instead I found Chemistry between Shantz & Avkash. (I mean Chemistry Study ) Anyway, Will share my incident tonight bit long, Abhi type karunga to Manager nikaal dega mujhe... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rohan Seth Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 Shoo. Go make a Chemistry thread for yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avkash Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 Bori ka ladka coming in 3 2 1..... sent using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avkash Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 ask bori ke ladke. Epic name calling is epic sent using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
achilles Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 Screw the haters. (Shantz and all ) yes. plants did come on land before animals did. one thing apart from the regular 'survival' theory is that due to photosynthesis, land and its atmosphere became heavily oxidised and some species those who werent averse to more oxygen, rather prefered more oxygen, began moving land wards. But how would the earliest beings under water prefer more oxygen? They didn't know what more oxygen felt like and had evolved under water for conditions that were..under water. In other places some have put theories that for intelligence to evolve we needed tools for which we needed fire and opposable thumbs to use those tools so we needed to be above water. But. Evolution is not pre-selection. It does not have a fixed direction. To say that we needed these to reach where we are is to assume we had to, had to reach where we are. Intelligence could have evolved in some other way under water too (again we are assuming that intelligence had to evolve) Speech and information passing could have evolved (in some unknown way to us right now) under water too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avkash Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 Not everybody had to evolve or has evolved. See Ambar. sent using Tapatalk 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avkash Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 Are jaldi jaldi post karke ye page fill karo warna dumbar se maar khani padegi sent using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DishuBOSS Posted April 16, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 He was about to send me his new address.. uska poster bhejna hai .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avkash Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 Uska address mujhe bhi dena XD sent using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CM Sunny Posted April 16, 2013 Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 Screw the haters. (Shantz and all ) But how would the earliest beings under water prefer more oxygen? They didn't know what more oxygen felt like and had evolved under water for conditions that were..under water. In other places some have put theories that for intelligence to evolve we needed tools for which we needed fire and opposable thumbs to use those tools so we needed to be above water. But. Evolution is not pre-selection. It does not have a fixed direction. To say that we needed these to reach where we are is to assume we had to, had to reach where we are. Intelligence could have evolved in some other way under water too (again we are assuming that intelligence had to evolve) Speech and information passing could have evolved (in some unknown way to us right now) under water too. Well because oxygen dissolved in water is less compared to land. Fishes adapt to it (explains their rapid mouth movement), others have to reach for surface every once in a while. Maybe that prompted them to prefer the surface? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DishuBOSS Posted April 16, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2013 Well because oxygen dissolved in water is less compared to land. Fishes adapt to it (explains their rapid mouth movement), others have to reach for surface every once in a while. Maybe that prompted them to prefer the surface? Absolutely correct, except for the last part.. organisms preferred the surface not because their was plenty of oxygen but because there was plenty to eat. And the bigger organisms (higher in the food chain followed). HUURRRRRR!!!! YEH MAIN KYA KAR RAHA HU ??? BHAAGO YAHAN SE... NO SCIENCE OR RATIONAL THINKING ALLOWED IN THIS THREAD !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.