Jump to content

Star Wars: Battlefront


Heaven Angel

Recommended Posts

lol, thats extremely one sided. lets forget all the good stuff they did and instead focus on the negatives.

just posting what i found on Reddit :P:fear:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol, thats extremely one sided. lets forget all the good stuff they did and instead focus on the negatives.

 

I doubt you could make a list that long. EA knows how to make money better than any other publisher out there . And when you do that you are bound to piss people off , but they dont care as long as they are the ones winning.

 

Its not even about the milking customers or w/e (If you dont like it dont buy it).

 

Its when they poke their nose into devs ,changing the game and then shutting it down when game fails. For them every fking game needs to be AAA ERMAGHERD COD types (A mentality many other publishers are trying to follow and killing themselves).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet my a*s this will have Premium

64 player DLC

6 Heroes pack DLC

Pilotable ATAT DLC

4 expansion DLC'S with 1 planes and 2 maps each

Unlock all weapons and force power DLC

Single player campaign DLC(Exluding premium) for $59.99

 

 

 

 

If you dont buy Premium jar jar will appear every where

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I doubt you could make a list that long. EA knows how to make money better than any other publisher out there .

What about Activision ? Activsion owns 3 billion dollar IPs now..They make more money than EA every year without pissing off their fanbase :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Activision ? Activsion owns 3 billion dollar IPs now..They make more money than EA every year without pissing off their fanbase :P

1.They dont make buggy games

2.Their greed is consistent in terms of CoD

3.with out pissing off fanbase? Remember Destiny?

4.Blizzard actually makes good games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. bNOHgH4.gif - Really?

2. bNOHgH4.gifbNOHgH4.gif - Yea, all those expansion packs for -craft series is not greed at all.

3. bNOHgH4.gifbNOHgH4.gifbNOHgH4.gif - Remember Diablo launch? Yep, didn't piss off any fans.

4. bNOHgH4.gifbNOHgH4.gifbNOHgH4.gifbNOHgH4.gif - bNOHgH4.gif

 

 

What about Activision ? Activsion owns 3 billion dollar IPs now..They make more money than EA every year without pissing off their fanbase :P

 

bNOHgH4.gifbNOHgH4.gif

 

No one is saint in gaming industry (okay, may be one or two), but EA and Activision are top two evil companies followed by Ubisoft.

Activi$ion has killed as many series/studios like EA. EA just owned more, so more killings.

 

Products:

 

Barbie Horse Adventures series - Dead.
Call of Duty series - MILKING EVERY YEAR.
James Bond series - Dead.
Skylanders series - Almost dead.
Spyro the Dragon series - Dead.
Tony Hawk's Pro Skater series - Dead.
Guitar Hero series - Dead.
Warcraft series - still milking. Make new game already.
StarCraft series - ^
Diablo series - Great launch. No bugs! bNOHgH4.gif
Heroes of the Storm - Good.
Overwatch - Time will tell.
Subsidiaries:

 

Beachhead Studios - CoD mobile. bNOHgH4.gif
Beenox - Spidey studio. Almost dead..
DemonWare - Great matchmaking for online games. bNOHgH4.gif
FreeStyleGames - Dead.
High Moon Studios - Somewhat alive.
Infinity Ward - ALIVE
Radical Entertainment - Um. Almost dead.
Raven Software - ALIVE.
Sierra Entertainment - Dead.
Sledgehammer Games - ALIVE.
Toys for Bob - Dead.
Treyarch - ALIVE
Vicarious Visions - Yearly Skylanders...mobile.
(dead as in buried for most cases)
All Activi$ion has is Call of Duty. And Blizzard has those -craft series running..
If anything at least EA tries and brings new stuff yearly, even if it turns out bad, we had some nice variety of games.
And speaking about money, Activi$ion actually made loss during 2013 (11px-Decrease2.svg.png US$ 4.583 billion (2013)), while EA made profit (11px-Increase2.svg.png US$ 3.797 billion (2013)).
(can't be arsed to check 2014 stats)
EA knows people are getting bored of Battlefield slowly. Hence they are publishing new shooters to keep things interesting. Titanfall, Hardline, now Battlefront. What's wrong?
What Activi$ion is doing? Yeah...release..Call of Duty yearly with $60 season pass + additional $$ for skins/slots/pack/other bull-shite. But when EA releases premium for their games (which lasts for 2 years), everyone loses their mind.
//
Fυck off from this thread if you are going to hate blindly. We know nothing about the game so far. You can come in and bitch when you have actual game details.
For now have hope (if it fails, only we are the losers. We'll be stuck with yearly BF/CoD games) and be glad that we are getting FREAKING STAR WARS game after so many years, and this is DICE. They have really good track record.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

*angry rant*

 

4f74e186d624d.png

"Really good track record" :rofl:

Who made battlefield 4 then?

DICE is powerless compared to EA.EA is meddling in DICE's dev. Process and messing up games just as they have been doing for 20 years.

Battlefront will die a terrible Death just like C&C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its quite sad now how the devs or how publishers are acting these days (ubisoft,activision)

 

i still remember we have a guy who ranted about how cod:ghosts was so bad

anyways no more ot

joe bhaiya is right not much info is out so lets wait and hope for the best :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its

joe bhaiya is right not much info is out so lets wait and hope for the best :)

People said the exact same words for Order 1886 and Destiny.

You know how both ended up.

And this is EA,Known for meddling and rushing games since the dawn of Time

Game will be like Destiny,with loads of cut content,But a hit financially, because of Star Wars branding

Swedish slaves have no say in the decisions of their cruel American Masters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EA will (sometimes rightly) get the blame for the studios that closed under their watch but people need remember how many studios died in the transition to the HD era that were not owned by EA. Last gen was a meat grinder for anyone who couldn't make massive hits.

 

Making medium sized hits in the PS2 gen was a viable strategy. It just didn't work in the HD era when the costs of making games went haywire.

 

As I said some of those closures was bad management and EA's fault. But a lot of those studios were never gonna make it. EA or no EA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...