WhiteWolf Posted February 24, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 (edited) . I got it for rs 999 for PC version and its defintely worth the price Me, Afty and Aman got it for Rs 699 with Monster Expansion DLC Evolve has more than enough content to keep you busy for weeks...Plus Turtle Rock will release new modes and maps for free in coming months... that is like less than one fourth the PS4 price - obviously your price is worth it Evolve console version is also quite cheap compared to Order 1886. Edited February 24, 2015 by Zodak™ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteWolf Posted February 24, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 Loved the Angry Joe review of Evolve btw, haven't played it but most people say it sums up the game perfectly. Iam waiting for his Order 1886 review... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentassassin Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 This game kinda reminds me of Medal of Honor game which released on last gen consoles.. It got horrible reviews..Meta should be 60 or less.. But actually lot of people enjoyed its campaign... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abdulah Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 that is like less than one fourth the PS4 price - obviously your price is worth it its not like you will keep this game forever , you will eventually sell it . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnackChap Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 This game kinda reminds me of Medal of Honor game which released on last gen consoles.. It got horrible reviews..Meta should be 60 or less.. But actually lot of people enjoyed its campaign... Heavenly sword is a more apt comparison. Both game got slammed for the lack of originality despite having good solid gameplay in their respective genre's. I can also guarantee you that just like HS People will be asking for a sequel for a long long time if sony decides to not continue with the ip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentassassin Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 Heavenly sword is a more apt comparison. Both game got slammed for the lack of originality despite having good solid gameplay in their respective genre's. I can also guarentee you that just like HS People will be asking for a sequel for a long long time if sony decides to not continue with the ip. I loved Heavenly sword , Its got decent reviews too.Not as disastrous as this.. Will be surprised if this gets a sequel.. Guess it depends on whether Sony acquires them or not.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarbonCore Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 HS gameplay was proper stinker, actually one of the worst hack n slash games I've ever played. This was the primary reason why everyone hated DmC reveal, not because of hipster Donte but because of the developer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gautam Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 The game is topping charts. Of course it'll get a sequel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VelivolusDas Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 (edited) The Order: 1886 sequel to focus on gameplay system, says insider Shinobi: "They're about 120-130 employees there. Not exactly small, but not huge either. From the conversations I've had, they spent a huge amount of time perfecting the engine for this initial instalment. Time constraints came into play, goals slashed, but that's not really uncommon in development. However, what has me most excited is that the main focus in a possible sequel are the gameplay systems. That's what was stated to me. The engine is in place and they're free to put all their efforts into gameplay design. And they want to do this, it isn't a result of any backlash over The Order's design, they as a team want that. By no means do they think the game's perfect as it is." He added: "I wasn't saying that a sequel's already greenlit, but I can tell you it certainly won't take 3 years. Edit: Source - http://www.psu.com/news/25968/The-Order--1886-sequel-to-focus-on-gameplay-system-says-insider Edited February 24, 2015 by VelivolusDas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VelivolusDas Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 Also, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyofx Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 Heavenly sword is a more apt comparison. Both game got slammed for the lack of originality despite having good solid gameplay in their respective genre's. I can also guarantee you that just like HS People will be asking for a sequel for a long long time if sony decides to not continue with the ip. The first thing I did last Friday was check how HS did on Metacritic as compared to The Order (yea yea, but I had to know). 79 was/is a decent enough score. I loved Heavenly Sword, personally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnackChap Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 The first thing I did last Friday was check how HS did on Metacritic as compared to The Order (yea yea, but I had to know). 79 was/is a decent enough score. I loved Heavenly Sword, personally. Personally the reviews back then felt like they were on a scale of 7-10. So far this gen, some big AAA titles are ranging in the 70's, something that was unthinkable a few years back so maybe, just maybe the reviewers are using the full scale this time around. . As i said in an earlier post i can understand where the 5,s and 6's are coming from. But 2 and 3 for a game that is as polished as this and with good gameplay and story is crazy. I also think RAD will forever be stuck in same situation that Guerrilla games are( the rohit sharma of sony 1st party studio) that no matter what they do, they'll get unwanted hate for all the order 1886 pre release fiasco. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyofx Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 Personally the reviews back then felt like they were on a scale of 7-10. So far this gen, some big AAA titles are ranging in the 70's, something that was unthinkable a few years back so maybe, just maybe the reviewers are using the full scale this time around. . As i said in an earlier post i can understand where the 5,s and 6's are coming from. But 2 and 3 for a game that is as polished as this and with good gameplay and story is crazy. Yea, that's a fair point. I do like the fact that reviewers are going back to the full 1-10 scale, though. There's a lot of flux in the gaming scene right now and I think the press has become seriously jaded. Some legitimately decent games are bearing the brunt of it. Driveclub was another recent example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentassassin Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 During PS2 , a game rated 7 was good and game rated 8 was awesome... Now the game is only good if it cross 8.5 / 9.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gautam Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 Yea, that's a fair point. I do like the fact that reviewers are going back to the full 1-10 scale, though. There's a lot of flux in the gaming scene right now and I think the press has become seriously jaded. Some legitimately decent games are bearing the brunt of it. Driveclub was another recent example. Driveclub at launch was a disaster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ne0 Posted February 25, 2015 Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 (edited) @reviews http://www.mweb.co.za/games/ViewNewsArticle/tabid/2549/Article/18377/The-Order-1886-sales-success-shows-reviews-dont-matter.aspx Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk Edited February 25, 2015 by Ne0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walker Posted February 25, 2015 Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 If this game continues to sell well over the next few weeks a sequel would be a no brainer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avkash Posted February 25, 2015 Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 its not like you will keep this game forever , you will eventually sell it . of course, not, lol, who sells games ? Especially exclusives. Also, there are more people who loved HS, what a surprise, the game had it's issues, but the merits outdid them for me personally, the combat was boring though, although the bow-arrow parts were super cool for DmC - I was absolutely against it, but the game is extreme fun to play, never thought I would see a day where I would be saying this, in fact I am itching to buy the PS4 version, it has everything the game lacked, 60 FPS and the manual lock on, perfect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteWolf Posted February 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 (edited) So was Halo MCBC But some how reviewers mi$$ed the Mark there Wonder how Halo MCC packs lot of value even without multiplayer.. Each Halo campaign is 12-15 hours long on normal with full 4 player co-op support... M.P matchmaking was broken but custom matches were still working without any issues..Plus Forge allows players to create their owns modes and maps to play locally with friends... Edited February 25, 2015 by Zodak™ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sach4life Posted February 25, 2015 Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 (edited) Halo MCC packs lot of value even without multiplayer.. Each Halo campaign is 12-15 hours long on normal with full 4 player co-op support... M.P matchmaking was broken but custom matches were still working without any issues..Plus Forge allows players to create their owns modes and maps to play locally with friends... That is not the point. I know many people who bought the game for MP. They had no intention of playing the campaigns. MP is still broken. If a game doesn't provide what it promised 2 months after launch, it shouldn't get 9+ scores. As simple as that.. Edited February 25, 2015 by sach4life 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.