playstation Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Advani ko speaker bana dega . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 The man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playstation Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Lol Swamy is just a verbal tool He is no where near the ranks to become a cabinet & rightly so considering his mental behaviour VK just joined party 2 months ago & has 0 political knowledge Shah is not an MP.......he can't hold any office until RS election & home is too big for his rank America mein defence minister Army wala ban sakta hai ...toh yeha kyuon nahi. About time India makes army wala Defence minister Ak anthony bada political knowledge dikhaya na ...jab china ghush gaya tha....Pakistan boat leke ghush gaya tha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playstation Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Bhai 86 years kii age mai vaise bhi wo ab kitne din ministry sambhalta Umar ka bhi ek takaza Hoto hai bhai Man ka Mohan jab PM ban sakta hai itna budha mein toh yeh koi ministry toh sambhal hi sakta hai na. He is good yaar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Lol Swamy is just a verbal tool He is no where near the ranks to become a cabinet & rightly so considering his mental behaviour I agree he is eccentric.He goes too much by vendetta. But Chidu was no different who did without shooting his mouth off. Today sahara is in jail but Mallya roaming free. One sqaundered public money one defaulted govt. You know why? Cuz Sahara was part of a group which sent letter to Kalam to stop Sonia from being PM. In last 5 yrs when BJP was quite passive in attacking govt on scams, Swamy did it legally, all alone. Be it National herald grab, 2G. He also has kept Ramsetu issue alive which govt doesnt want to take fwd for secular reasons. Finally, not good being on bad side if Swamy. He was not given LS seat but RS seat and cabinet should be OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Manmohan is 5 years younger to him & he is retired today Kya baat karta hai bhai Advani should have retired after 2009 elections Just like ABV retired after 2004 elections Bhai admi ko pata hona chahiye ki kab bas karna hai LK should stay out....he shouldn't even have contested this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 @coolfunnytshirt PM के विदाई डिनर पार्टी में राहुल गाँधी नही पहुँचे, मेन्यू मे Bornvita का न होना इसका कारण बताया जा रहा है| But he says Last night I woke in the morning and had my dinner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Good. This guy was spewing venom like anything. Cringeworthy stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CM Sunny Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Bhrashtachar kiya....sorry balatkar kiya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Yuva josh! From twitter...this is height ND तिवारी की अंतिम इच्छा: ना मुझे जलाया जाये, ना दफनाया जाये प्यार की मशालें जलती रहे मेरे बाद भी, मुझे पीस कर शिलाजीत मे मिलाया जाये। Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paapi Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 In last 5 yrs when BJP was quite passive in attacking govt on scams, Swamy did it legally, all alone. Be it National herald grab, 2G. He also has kept Ramsetu issue alive which govt doesnt want to take fwd for secular reasons. Finally, not good being on bad side if Swamy. He was not given LS seat but RS seat and cabinet should be OK. Can you help me understand the secular reason you are referring to.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piper Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Udham, this Swamy is the same guy who got kicked out of his role at Harvard for not-so-secular-reasons, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godspeed4476 Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Congress-conundrum-Dilemma-over-Gandhis-amid-buzz-of-dissent/articleshow/35154544.cms They are saying now, what i was saying two years back Rahul has "wasted" 10 years (he was first elected to Lok Sabha in 2004), "destroyed" the Youth Congress and the party's student wing NSUI in the name of inner-party democracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoonStruckHorrors Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Good. This guy was spewing venom like anything. Cringeworthy stuff. Anti-Modi? More like Anti-RSS. This guy was tweeting far worse things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Can you help me understand the secular reason you are referring to.. http://www.niticentral.com/2013/02/25/10-facts-about-the-ram-setu-row-49844.html An important cultural heritage will be destroyed because seculars don't believe in existence of Ram. Anti-Modi? More like Anti-RSS. This guy was tweeting far worse things.Yeah. He is a psychopath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piper Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 Lolz, they should have this broadcast on DD : http://9gag.tv/p/a9Jqwx/watch-the-banned-cartoon-that-denmark-uses-to-get-young-people-to-vote-voteman?ref=fbl9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paapi Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 http://www.niticentral.com/2013/02/25/10-facts-about-the-ram-setu-row-49844.html An important cultural heritage will be destroyed because seculars don't believe in existence of Ram. The link you gave had following points.. it had absolutely nothing about so called secularism believing or not believing in existence of Ram 1. The UPA Government announced the launch of the Sethusamudram Shipping Channel Project (SCCP) in 2005 to create a shipping channel between the Palk Bay and the Gulf on Mannar between India and Sri Lanka. 2. The project would include dredging across the Ram Setu or Adam’s Bridge, believed by Hindus to be a bridge built by Lord Ram to journey to Lanka. This bridge is said to be one of the most important religious sites for Hindus, and plays a significant role in the Ramayana. 3. The Supreme Court had, in 2007, restrained the UPA Government from going ahead with the project, and suggested that the Government examine an alternative route that does not dredge the Ram Setu. 4. The shipping channel is proposed to be 30 metres wide, 12 metres deep and 167 kilometres long. 5. Janata Party President Subramaniam Swamy had called for the Ram Setu to be conferred the status of national monument. Swamy also contended that the demolition of Ram Setu will amount to a criminal offence under section 295 IPC. 6. The Sethusamudram project drew the ire of Hindus across the country, who see it as a disrespect to Hindu religious beliefs. 7. Following national outrage over the project, Hindu groups formed the ‘Save Ram Sethu’ campaign in 2007 to create awareness, and to stop the Government from continuing the project. 8. The Sethusamudram project has also drawn widespread opposition from environmental activists, who argue that it will cause a great deal of damage to local habitation and marine life. 9. Besides environmental hazards, the SCCP was found to be economically unviable, as suggested by a report prepared by environmentalist RK Pachauri. The recommendation was rejected by the Government. 10. The BJP has warned the UPA Government against the demolition of Ram Setu, and said that it will not tolerate any tampering with the historical bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted May 15, 2014 Report Share Posted May 15, 2014 http://m.rediff.com/news/2007/sep/12ram.htm We good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.0cdff05eb48d7a556a500c7e008f7499.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.