Jump to content

KiranB28
 Share

Recommended Posts

"Fan is more likely to see changes than flash at this point.”

 

Fan is not a problem. Like all ultimates, you just have to find yourself in good position. It's the flashbang which is so freaking annoying. SdiY7Oq.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, neither needs a nerf. But if they are going to nerf Fan, they should rather nerf the flashbang.

Even if you don't land the flashbang correctly, you can still use secondary fire -> combat roll (auto reload) -> secondary fire.

 

Fan is one of the coolest ultimate and can actually hide yourself as soon as you hear the noise.

 

_

 

New comic #6: Torbjörn: Destroyer

 

HIa3G5G.jpg

Edited by Heaven Angel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's trying too hard to stand out.

 

Anyone who knows or played Blizzard games knows how much "content" it end up having it.

Microtransactions? What? 1HqMIiE.gif

He himself says that there are ton of synergies and ways to play and it'll take tons & 100s of hours.

Then he continues to praise about heroes and community.

Even if FPS is not your thing, you should try it out. It'll change your mind.

...

ends up 7/10.

 

Nothing but a pretentious lazy review without actually exploring everything.

4 modes, 12 maps, weekly unique brawls, 21 heroes with unique abilities to try and master => lack of content. Okay. 1HqMIiE.gif

 

Bitching about price when you know Blizzard is going to give DLCs, heroes for free and provide support for decade(s).

 

_

 

 

Moving on, Overwatch Competitive mode to return roughly end of July.

 

https://twitter.com/PlayOverwatch/status/736331124645863424

Edited by Heaven Angel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

U completely agree ?

 

Cant base your opinion on just playing the beta..

The beta was (included all the characters, maps and modes) the full game, and I played for a hefty 15+ hours. I think I'm allowed to form an opinion after that. As for the review, I agree with his "review"(aka the negatives). Review scores can get weird, but as of the game's current state, it's a solid 8/10 for me.

 

He suck and his reviews suck. Don't know why you give him so much importance and constantly post his reviews.

Joe actually uses the full review scale(1-10) and so even a 5/10 score is considered "average" according to his reviews rather than outright horrible according to the "modern standard" of review scores by other reviewers(say IGN and Gamespot). Also, aren't reviews just glorified opinions? I don't agree with his every statement(or some other reviews regarding other games) but in here I agree with him.

 

And no, I'm not an Angry Joe fanboy :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's trying too hard to stand out.

 

Anyone who knows or played Blizzard games knows how much "content" it end up having it.

Microtransactions? What? 1HqMIiE.gif

He himself says that there are ton of synergies and ways to play and it'll take tons & 100s of hours.

Then he continues to praise about heroes and community.

Even if FPS is not your thing, you should try it out. It'll change your mind.

...

ends up 7/10.

 

Nothing but a pretentious lazy review without actually exploring everything.

4 modes, 12 maps, weekly unique brawls, 21 heroes with unique abilities to try and master => lack of content. Okay. 1HqMIiE.gif

 

Bitching about price when you know Blizzard is going to give DLCs, heroes for free and provide support for decade(s).

 

 

so true lol .......praises them almost throughout the entire video and suddenly at the end ......bam! 7/10 :rofl:

so true,he's hurrying up the review these days

 

about the price part though ---he did mention the price issue was with reference to the content provided at launch

but ya a very lazy review indeed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know. Compared to other games, the price is fair and normal. Just because it doesn't have campaign, it doesn't mean it lacks content. It's a long term investment.
If you compare with other games or Battleborn, it might have little extra campaign and stuff, but game is already dead and price is dropped by 40%.

It took me ~35+ hours to reach rank 50 and have barely scratched all heroes. Played only Junkrat, Pharah, Symmetra. A little of Soldier: 76, D.Va, Reaper and Mercy. Other heroes for less than an hour.

~35+ hours for $40? I already got my money's worth. There is plenty more to come.

 

____

 

 

Huh..Battle..whatnow? 1HqMIiE.gif

 

Ryuu Ga Waga Teki Go F!#k Yourself VQZWKcI.gif

Edited by Heaven Angel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kinda agree with AJ. Right now its not worth 9s or 10s but few months later it will be. Also the point of the game getting repetitive over longer sessions is true. I cant seem to play more than 5-7 games at a stretch, especially when playing alone. Also there are few dumb stuff like POTG which needs to show some real cool stuff instead of bastion going pew pew pew and the loot boxes issues.

 

The game is a solid 8/10 though. Also a modest price tag of 20-40$ wouldve been more reasonable.

Edited by Mizanurification
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also there are few dumb stuff like POTG which needs to show some real cool stuff instead of bastion going pew pew pew and the loot boxes issues.

 

Well, fragging a lot of opponents in a couple of seconds is always going to give you PoTG rather than playing Mercy / Medic healing players consistently through out the match, so cannot complaint about that.

 

About the game being worth it, we will know in a couple months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mercy does get POTG. But you can't expect standard healing (since it's her role in game) as POTG moment. It should be some winning/game changing moment.

 

Resurrecting team while securing the objective/defending the payload usually gets the POTG moment.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I played the beta, for the time it was available to all. Personally, I found it boring as fk....it just did not click with me. I' d rather go play TF2 again.

 

But what I wanted to know is that when Titanfall, Battlefront etc did not have a SP campaign, they got a lot of flak from reviews (at the $60 price). So why not this game. Also, for those in the know, how many MP only games released without ranked play?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm. Yes, TF was equally fun and also quite unique multiplayer experience and it shipped with 15 maps and 8 modes. It also had Cod style unlock and progression system but it got destroyed by critics for not having enough content.

 

Only difference is that Blizzard is offering free content for Overwatch whereas EA was charging money for TF maps at launch.

Edited by WhiteWolf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm. Yes, TF2 was equally fun and also quite unique multiplayer experience and it shipped with 15 maps and 8 modes. It also had Cod style unlock and progression system but it got destroyed by critics for not having enough content.

 

Only difference is that Blizzard is offering free content for Overwatch whereas EA was charging money for TF2 maps at launch.

 

wut?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...