Jump to content

Diablo 3


Aftrunner
 Share

Recommended Posts

Blizzard has always pulled up awesome cutscenes. I doubt that any of the movies are using the game engine. But I don't like the art motif of WoW in the movies - it's ok in the game. This just goes back to the old old days of Starcraft and Diablo. Any of you remember the cinematics from Diablo II and Warcraft 3 - the opening cinematics were simply amazing. Diablo II - the asylum scene, and then Warcraft III - the orc rush :sign_omg:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The models look low poly , and if you see the gameplay vids you will see the similarities.

They have cheated a bit for the flaming palm scene however.

They FMA are usually really well scripted , shot and rendered, I guess they where doing the class introductions as a inhouse jig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blizzard has always pulled up awesome cutscenes. I doubt that any of the movies are using the game engine. But I don't like the art motif of WoW in the movies - it's ok in the game. This just goes back to the old old days of Starcraft and Diablo. Any of you remember the cinematics from Diablo II and Warcraft 3 - the opening cinematics were simply amazing. Diablo II - the asylum scene, and then Warcraft III - the orc rush :majesty:

 

 

Holy crap yes! those were awesome...Blizzard makes kick a*s cutscenes. Which is why I was alittle dissappointed with this one,but they didnt really seem like cut scenes...who knows,who cares,the game looks great, trust in blizzard. :devil: Looks like theyve got the starcraft style right now,so maybe it's an initial thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blizzard has always pulled up awesome cutscenes. I doubt that any of the movies are using the game engine. But I don't like the art motif of WoW in the movies - it's ok in the game. This just goes back to the old old days of Starcraft and Diablo. Any of you remember the cinematics from Diablo II and Warcraft 3 - the opening cinematics were simply amazing. Diablo II - the asylum scene, and then Warcraft III - the orc rush :helpsmilie:

 

I also like the Intro and Outro videos in Frozen throne. I just love the voice-acting in all the Blizzard videos; especially Deckard Cain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:helpsmilie: bummer, but I guess its way too cumbersome to play Diablo on a console !

 

Diablo is still much simpler than Sacred 2, which was ported to the consoles (and apparently was a disaster).

 

I'm sure D3 on consoles can be done but Blizzard doesn't want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh btw...

 

Blizzard: No Diablo 3 Release for 2010

 

Much news and excitement has derived from BlizzCon today but a release for Diablo III next year is not happening. CEO Mike Morhaime has confirmed that the just-revealed World of Warcraft expansion Cataclysm and StarCraft II are the two titles the company expects to hit in 2010.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure D3 on consoles can be done but Blizzard doesn't want to.

 

but why ? Blizzard would get to sell more copies and less chances of piracy as well. Since activision is involved let us see, it might even end up on consoles. If there is no technical limitation and more money can be made, I think Activision will pitch in for a port to the consoles :helpsmilie:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

totally expected after SC II got delayed

 

but why ?

I would say Battle.NET would be the biggest stumbling block. It has a huge trading community and managing it on PSN / XBL and PC would be killing. That's one headache. Also Blizzard is completely anal about quality and would concentrate on getting every detail right like the control scheme - getting it to work on the consoles might not be something they would want to invest in.

 

lol, looks like they are afraid Diablo 3 might steal some of the WoW's expansion pack's thunder....which is their primary cash cow .... the influence of activision is showing :devil:

nope - I would say Battle.NET and SC II. SCII hasn't even gone into Beta yet and they don't want to screw up SC II. Anyways they got a lot of flak for splitting up the game into three episodes so they have to come with a strong entry. Battle.NET is geared for each specific game - so they will ensure that it works for SC II first, then go onto D3 development. As far as cash cow goes Blizzard has the biggest in the world in their pocket anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...