Jump to content

Call of Duty : Black Ops III


Keano

Recommended Posts

Those who finish the campaign may want to read the scrolling texts before each mission. There is a twist in the story..hehe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Runs decent,40-60 at med settings (1080p). But drops to below 20 during super action heavy scenes, but nothing that will mess up the game for you. MP performs much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Runs decent,40-60 at med settings (1080p). But drops to below 20 during super action heavy scenes, but nothing that will mess up the game for you. MP performs much better

 

Below 2?0..holyshit. From 60 to 20 fps :panic:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BO3 is having issues on high end PCs as well...So blaming Xbox One hardware for everything is unfair coz AW version of Xbox one was quite good and it never had any major frame-rate issues plus it looked much better visually than BO3..

 

 

here from Digital Foundry -

 

 

Sledgehammer's ground-up rebuild of the Call of Duty engine pushes heavily on post-process effects, such as full-screen (and per-object) motion blur, a depth of field filter and a sparing use of chromatic aberration during play. As a result, the stand-off between the Xbox One's minimum 1360x1080 and PS4's full 1920x1080 is less perceptible during hectic firefights, with fast camera sweeps often blurring these high contrast edges.The Xbox One produces a native 1920x1080 resolution too, but only in subdued moments. Clinical interior areas, such as Atlas' labs, tend not to strain the hardware enough to enforce a downsized framebuffer.

 

With patch version 1.04 installed, the PS4 version's constant 1080p output comes at a price. We catch dips between the 50-60fps lines during battles through Seoul's streets - with drops to the high 40s caught when throwing the 'threat' grenades to scan the area for enemies. Even in perfectly matched scenes, the Xbox One's performance tends to hold at a perfect 60fps by comparison.

 

 

 

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-performance-analysis

 

AW runs at much higher resolution on both consoles with better visuals and frame-rate....AW engine is much better than what Treyarch using it for BO3...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AW was a solo game genius

This is a 4player co-op campaign

 

Obviously the tech is more demanding

 

also AW was more stable in performance (like res & frames)

it wasn't more good looking engine wise or anything

Fidelity was much higher and levels were also quite massive in AW and you were never alone in AW, A.I teammates were always with you throughout the campaign..

 

Halo 5 also supports 4 player co-op with much bigger levels and vehicular combat and it runs at constant 60fps with same dynamic resolution like BO3. Both are using same techniques to hold 60fps on consoles..Cutscenes 1080p30fps and gameplay dynamic resolution 60fps. And before you say BO 3 looks better than Halo, i suggest you check some side by side screenshots of the game where Halo 5 crushes BO 3 in both scale & visuals.

 

 

And why are you forgetting that BO 3 is having issues even on PCs not just Xbox one...Game is poorly optimized nothing else.

 

 

HERE

 

GTX 980 is more powerful than both console GPUs and it can't run this unoptimized sh*t at stable 60fps..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol at guys downplaying blop3 cause of the missed marketing deal. advanced warfare looked just about the same as blops3 while playing the game. the only time is looked head and shoulders better than blops3 was in the cutscenes which was completely pre rendered back then. everything is in realtime here and the game is very ambitious in scope. even the SP campaign is very different to anything cod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, here's a guy who tested it on 980Ti and 970 and he isn't having any issues..So it varies from person to person with certain components in their rigs maybe ?

 

May be they patched it now, but lot of people on official COD forums and Nvidia forums were complaining about input lag and massive frame-rate issues on GTX 970 and 980..

 

Game takes massive hit in certain sections..This issue was not there in AW even on GTX 760 on high settings.. Here frame-rate drops as low as 20 from 60 fps.

 

 

 

 

 

:lol:

Levels were bigger than past COD games and wide enough for player move to around...Game allowed you to flank enemies from different directions..BO 3 levels are bigger but game looks nothing special to have such severe frame-rate issues even on high end PCs, considering there are games with even bigger levels which run and look much better than BO3 visually on weak hardware like Xbox One

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May be they patched it now, but lot of people on official COD forums and Nvidia forums were complaining about input lag and massive frame-rate issues on GTX 970 and 980..

 

That video was posted on Nov 6 when game released so obviously he must have received his copy in advance even before patch released..Besides the game may have memory management issue just like MK X...for some it works flawlessly some it doesn't..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...