Big Boss Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 Don't post OT here. Post in DriveClub topic. Also I said BOTH, if both give bad scores, then game is bad. One of them can make a mistake, not both. Samjha? Ki hindi me explain karu? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnackChap Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 Now zodka will stop posting giant bomb links. first he should stop editing 95% of this posts. guy has some issues for sure, editing posts minutes or hours later, wont be surprised if some of them are edited after days too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walker Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 So basically what I understand from this discussion is if you haven't played gears 1 before then you will not like it because of frustrating issues. So basically the game is a waste of time unless youre nostalgic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Boss Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 first he should stop editing 95% of this posts. guy has some issues for sure, editing posts minutes or hours later, wont be surprised if some of them are edited after days too. What did he edit now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteWolf Posted August 27, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 If i don't edit post then you all cry for posting DP and when i edit, you cry again that edit my post alot lol..Deemag theek kar apna khud pehley... So basically what I understand from this discussion is if you haven't played gears 1 before then you will not like it because of frustrating issues. So basically the game is a waste of time unless youre nostalgic. Yes, it's for those who liked and played original Gears..Gears 1 still regarded as best Gears by community even with all it's issues. If you only played later Gears games and not Gears 1 then you will not enjoy it.. Also I said BOTH, if both give bad scores, then game is bad. One of them can make a mistake, not both. Samjha? Ki hindi me explain karu? GS gave DriveClub - 5/10 & GB - 2/5 Both gave it bad score, now what ? Look at all Ponies trying very hard to bash Gears for no reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarbonCore Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 So basically what I understand from this discussion is if you haven't played gears 1 before then you will not like it because of frustrating issues. So basically the game is a waste of time unless youre nostalgic. Basically. If you're playing for first time you'll keep scratching your head why this one got so much praise 9 years ago. If you're repeat player you are basically playing for nostalgia goosebumps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteWolf Posted August 27, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 Basically. If you're playing for first time you'll keep scratching your head why this one got so much praise 9 years ago. If you're repeat player you are basically playing for nostalgia goosebumps. +1 If you never played original game then you will not enjoy GearsUE now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinJo Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 ^Page not found...dhang se post toh kar pehley lol... here all reviews are on GAF.. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1101215 You clearly not interested in Gears, so stop trolling here now.. So only GB and GS are trusted sites and rest all are bad now From now on you guys should only post GB and GS review score for PS4 games, ok? Do you remember what score Jeff gave to DriveClub? What about SlackerNinja's NDTV gadget review ? Can we trust his 9/10 Links is opening maybe your inner self is not allowing to open the link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteWolf Posted August 27, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 Gears of War: Ultimate Edition was built in less than ten months Gears of War: Ultimate Edition was developed in just ten months, developer The Coalition has revealed. In a new behind-the-scenes trailer, executive producer Mike Crump discusses the shortened development period for the game, including working with external partners. "Typically on a game of this size and this scale, you'd have two to three years to create all the assets that need to go into the game. In this case we had just under ten months," explained Crump. Crump continued: "We went to find partners who could help us basically realise our vision for the game. We're now working with a number of different partners in six countries on four continents around the world." No wonder A.I bugs are still there. Digital Foundry vs Gears of War: Ultimate Edition Final Analysis - Just how does one tackle remaking one of the most visually influential games of the last decade? It's a difficult question and one that developer The Coalition - along with partner Splash Damage - seeks to answer with the release of Gears of War: Ultimate Edition on Xbox One. The original Gears of War had a tremendous impact on the industry as a whole both in terms of the development process and its game design. Visually, as Epic's first outing with Unreal Engine 3, Gears was a landmark release for real-time rendering. Re-envisioning such a game on new hardware is no small task - so just how successful is this latest effort? It starts with the game's beating heart - the game engine. While Gears of War 4 is in development using Unreal Engine 4, Gears Ultimate instead opts for more familiar ground - the original 2006 source code. From the beginning, the Ultimate Edition was designed to capture the original experience as accurately as possible while updating its presentation for the current generation. More recent versions of Unreal Engine 3, and even UE4, were considered early in development, but the decision to stick with the original codebase was made in order to preserve the original simulation. Re-scripting things such as enemy behavior in a new engine would have changed its core DNA, resulting in something that wasn't quite Gears of War. Despite the huge visual upgrades, authenticity to the original experience is a key component of the Ultimate Edition. This approach also extends to map design - the original grey box map layouts were kept in the transition but virtually everything else was tossed out. Every asset was compiled and re-authored at a much higher fidelity before being placed back into the game. It's an approach not unlike that of the Halo Anniversary remasters - keeping the original simulation and level structure while improving the overall presentation. Unlike Halo, the requirements necessary to run both the original version of the game and the Ultimate Edition simultaneously were simply too high, making it impossible to toggle between the two versions on the fly. Gears of War: Ultimate Edition - the Digital Foundry verdict Ultimately, what we have here is a strict - albeit visually appealing - remake of the original Gears of War. The game plays exactly as it did in 2006, with the same animations, the same controls, and the same AI behaviour. This is Gears of War with a fresh coat of paint - but the visual enhancements are impressive, with far-raching changes that have a huge impact on the overall presentation. If you haven't played the original in a while, there might be a tendency to look at Ultimate as a minor upgrade, but that's underselling the scale of the achievement here. If this upgrade isn't enough, there's also the DX12 Windows 10 PC release to come, which supports higher resolutions, faster frame-rates, and promises better overall image quality. In some respects, the fact that the Ultimate Edition remains so faithful to the original may actually wind up being one of its weaknesses. Gears of War was basically the progenitor for the cover-based shooter of the last generation, but a lot has changed since its debut, and as a result, its gameplay may feel dated for some. On the other hand, it preserves everything that was core to the experience, while bringing many of its most dated elements into line with a modern, current-gen release and as an overall package, it works. We enjoyed it a lot and feel that it's a highly worthy remake, but with its gameplay elements firmly rooted in the past, it may not be for everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpearHea:D Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 GS gave DriveClub - 5/10 & GB - 2/5 Both gave it bad score, now what ? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Boss Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 In comparison, the Xbox One version manages to hold 30fps for the majority of the duration. Dips that do occur tend to exhibit screen-tear along the top 25 per cent of the image. It's a bit surprising that slowdown is present at all to be perfectly honest, but this certainly suggests that 60fps was never on the table for the campaign - we're certainly curious to see how Gears 4 turns out in this regard. Can't believe still. 30 fps for 9 year old game remaster is very strange. And still fps drops below 30 and there is screen tear. This is what happens when you put a port together in 10 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KyoyaHibari Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 This is Ultimate edition thread though nothing to do with old game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Boss Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 Yup obviously. We have separate Gears 1 thread. Praise the game there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomShade Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 In comparison, the Xbox One version manages to hold 30fps for the majority of the duration. Dips that do occur tend to exhibit screen-tear along the top 25 per cent of the image. It's a bit surprising that slowdown is present at all to be perfectly honest, but this certainly suggests that 60fps was never on the table for the campaign - we're certainly curious to see how Gears 4 turns out in this regard. Can't believe still. 30 fps for 9 year old game remaster is very strange. And still fps drops below 30 and there is screen tear. This is what happens when you put a port together in 10 months. B-b-b-b-but new models! high res textures! its a REMAKE you heard that !!!????? totally worth buying new Xbox One for imo... *insert Obligatory GoW3 sh*tpost here* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speeddemon Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 Hello, Yes 60fps should have been the target for this game, guess they had limited time to work on the game, i have an xbox one & planning to also buy the ps4 soon, will still buy this game as its legendary, a true gamer will own both consoles, you need to own both consoles this generation(if you have the money off course) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomShade Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 Hello, Yes 60fps should have been the target for this game, guess they had limited time to work on the game, i have an xbox one & planning to also buy the ps4 soon, will still buy this game as its legendary, a true gamer will own both consoles, you need to own both consoles this generation(if you have the money off course) kiska alt hai tu bol ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinJo Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 at this dog runs at more than 30 fps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Boss Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 Hello, Yes 60fps should have been the target for this game, guess they had limited time to work on the game, i have an xbox one & planning to also buy the ps4 soon, will still buy this game as its legendary, a true gamer will own both consoles, you need to own both consoles this generation(if you have the money off course) IPCHECK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteWolf Posted August 27, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 lol, f**king A all these ppl ruining this topic for no reason, let's judge every AAA game ever made a decade after it's release from now on. Gears was on of the most influential games of last era, doesn't matter how it feels today, nothing's gonna change that. That's why Ponies hate Gears. GearsUE is their main target right now, soon they will move to Forza and Halo 5 Can't believe still. 30 fps for 9 year old game remaster is very strange. Frame-rate only drops for few seconds during Berserker battle according to those who played it.. As expected Final verdict toh completely ignore kardiya tuney... Gears of War: Ultimate Edition - the Digital Foundry verdict Ultimately, what we have here is a strict - albeit visually appealing - remake of the original Gears of War. The game plays exactly as it did in 2006, with the same animations, the same controls, and the same AI behaviour. This is Gears of War with a fresh coat of paint - but the visual enhancements are impressive, with far-raching changes that have a huge impact on the overall presentation. If you haven't played the original in a while, there might be a tendency to look at Ultimate as a minor upgrade, but that's underselling the scale of the achievement here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomShade Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 IPCHECK. do it mods Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.