Jump to content

PlayStation vs Xbox vs Nintendo thread


Recommended Posts

Sony is still primarily a Playstation Console Company.

They are hardware manufacturers & sellers.


They won’t release their games same year on PC until & unless there is no scope in hardware anymore.

 

They created everything what they did from their foundations to have a hardware install base in every consumer gadget.

Edited by AnK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, gecko89 said:

Meh, ports of games released years ago on PS, having already been played by 10's of Millions of players VS a PC centric game that's releasing Day1 on PC.

To expect it to not pull much better numbers would be moronic.

 

Edit: nevermind

 

42 minutes ago, RV1709 said:


don’t set up the game for drags by comparing it Vs old PS games 

 

Thanks for picking up the Bait children :hi:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, gecko89 said:

 

boo-boo-this-man.gif

Now I regret editing off the second half part of my reply :threatenlumber:

 

Whats actually funny in that Sony PC game photo is that Sony is treating PC players as third rate users who are getting the leftover scraps and these guys seem to be proud & happy about it. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KnackChap said:

 

Whats actually funny in that Sony PC game photo is that Sony is treating PC players as third rate users who are getting the leftover scraps and these guys seem to be proud & happy about it. 


Atleast they are getting them now.

 

I remember what the state of PC players was during second half of PS2 up until second half of XBone.

 

Lmao….poor master race practically missed out on the golden age of high fidelity 3D gaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Vamos said:


This would be a fair comparison :fear1:


IxuFoTe.png

 

 

 

Yeah but Starfield is not officially launched yet. Early access version is 100$. 

 

Every other game shown in the list is a free to play multiplayer game except BG3 (GOTY 2023) and GTAV is evergreen game. 

Edited by Kazarka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, AnK said:


Atleast they are getting them now.

 

I remember what the state of PC players was during second half of PS2 up until second half of XBone.

 

Lmao….poor master race practically missed out on the golden age of high fidelity 3D gaming.

Not many like and respect old and used stuff.  PC gamers dont like when Sony gives them old PS4 games at 70$, when they are like 10$ on PSN store right now or at retail/online shops. Come on, you cant blame them for getting bit upset. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Assassins Creed said:

w9TI8vC_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&

 

Fight Here :spank:

 

$100 Game Beating $70 $60 Games Combined :naughty:

 

Sept 6th jo numbers aayega usse pehle go hide and save yourselves 

 

You can also add total playtime of all those games and Starfield will still come out on top in a few months.

 

Much more important metric IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Vaibhavp said:

 

You can also add total playtime of all those games and Starfield will still come out on top in a few months.

 

Much more important metric IMO.

Different genres bro, i dont think any one will put 100 hours into games like spiderman. They are kind of one and done. two or three max (Limited people).

but again different games different audience . both need to co-exist :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rushab oswal said:

Different genres bro, i dont think any one will put 100 hours into games like spiderman. They are kind of one and done. two or three max (Limited people).

but again different games different audience . both need to co-exist :thumbsup:

 

Not necessarily different genres. 

 

Reason people don't play them as much is simple: you can't. 

 

Most of their budget goes in polishing visuals, animations, lip syncing etc. Playing it gets jarring after a while and people just rush to the finish line.

 

Bethesda games, you must have seen how bad all that stuff is. How much they prioritise it. They do put effort in areas that increase longevity of the game. 

 

Of course you can prefer one thing or the other. Just pointing it out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Vaibhavp said:

You can also add total playtime of all those games and Starfield will still come out on top in a few months.

 

Much more important metric IMO.

 

That's not a proper metric at all. Playtime doesn't make a game good or worse than shorter games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...