Jump to content

PlayStation vs Xbox vs Nintendo thread


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, El Tigre Chino said:

Do certain people here identify as cucks in some way and have I offended them? 🤔

There's definitely at least one here.

My doubts lie in one xcuck who keeps engaging and running away 😂

Edited by gecko89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, gecko89 said:

How about not use the word at all? I sure didn't until one of the xthots used it today.

And I used it as one person belonging to a general group, not that individual

 

Riiiiiight. Anyways, moving on.

 

 

22 minutes ago, gecko89 said:

Besides, didn't you guys go at each others families? Or am I mistaken? 

 

You are mistaken. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RV1709 said:

[Digital Foundry] Baldur's Gate 3 on PS5 is effectively the PC version at ultra settings

 

wonder what it will be like on series L when it comes out

 

 

Oof that performance. It goes under 20.

 

Series S will really struggle especially in Act 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would take another kind of brain & even guts to an extent to come to the Conclusion that it is Sony that can create an industry wide media bias against M$ studio games with the power of money/influence/benefits!! :rofl: 

 

Sony has literally sidelined itself from the entire promotional marketing & these portals not even having freakin showcases anymore which gives these portals basic material to thrive. :lol: 

 

To assume that they would want silent,poorer,totally non influential(be it other sects,economics or politics)Sony to thrive over M$ which has all these credentials is quite a bright brained notion :rofl: 

 

But what else can we expect from the bright brained Xbots who even supported DRM,Kinnect &“resolution doesn’t matter” at one point. :giggle: 

 

Or even thought the magic of cloud computing(not streaming) is real :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AnK said:

It would take another kind of brain & even guts to an extent to come to the Conclusion that it is Sony that can create an industry wide media bias against M$ studio games with the power of money/influence/benefits!! :rofl: 

 

Sony has literally sidelined itself from the entire promotional marketing & these portals not even having freakin showcases anymore which gives these portals basic material to thrive. :lol: 

 

To assume that they would want silent,poorer,totally non influential(be it other sects,economics or politics)Sony to thrive over M$ which has all these credentials is quite a bright brained notion :rofl: 

 

But what else can we expect from the bright brained Xbots who even supported DRM,Kinnect &“resolution doesn’t matter” at one point. :giggle: 

 

Or even thought the magic of cloud computing(not streaming) is real :lol: 

 

It is hilarious, no doubt.

 

I can understand critics bias against certain historic franchises such as Zelda but to say that a game gets reviewed better just because it is a Sony game is pure gold. Funny thing is, same people will then point fingers at others calling them 'ponies' or 'fanboys'. As if they are any less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sach4life said:

bias against certain historic franchises such as Zelda


I don’t think there is any such thing either.

I haven’t seen a single gamer dispute it’s credentials.

 

 

But looking at the chain of events surrounding Starfield:-

 

-No Gameplay up until Launch date,which ought to be delayed 

 

-Very controlled & edited footages put out to show visuals+performance after that.

 

-No previews leading up to the new date.

 

-Embargo on basically everything put up until public launch.

 

-No review copies given to most of credible media across the world

 

-Shills/Influencers/Biased channels (most even having an outright M$ reference in URL)given preference & sort of a promotional partner status in turn getting perfect scores from all of them.

 

-Using promotional words which suggest it’s up there with some of Industry’s best.

 

-Once actual reviews from long time industry veterans start putting out low scores,suggesting that it is out of some sort of bias.

 

Arrey bhai koi paanchhvi chhatti ka bachcha bhi bata dega yeh chal kya raha hai :rofl: 

 

Hum toh kya he bolle iske aage. :lol: 

 

 

As suggested earlier,my personal opinion is that all this was not needed & a clear presentation of the product would have garnered a much more credible kickstart in this new phase of M$ gaming.

The game is evidently good/great & would have easily reflected that in response it would have got.

Doing these shenanigans will only create more doubt/uncertainty in future M$ gaming endeavours.

 

I don’t think any sane individual would see all those Xbox/Windows/Achievement URL sites & neglect what IGN/Gamespot/Eurogamer/The Guardian/Metro/Game Informer has to say about the product.

 

I simply don’t see this title moving Xbox’s or Subscriptions anymore which otherwise would have had a better chance even with future prospects.

 

 

Edited by AnK
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, RV1709 said:

 

 

13 hours ago, triggr happy ss said:

Different publisher’s different goals ,if square is themselves not happy with the results you can blame xbox for it. 

 

 

 

13 hours ago, gecko89 said:

Lol, remember xthots whining about FF16 'had it released on xbox too, they'd have more units.. Money on the table' 

 

Goes from F4 selling 10+ Million units in a day to Starfield 1 Million 'players', yayyy... :roflroll:

 

I thought this was true before reading in detail, but the reality is 12 Million Shipped to Retail and not consumers, It was 2015 times have changed now so need to celebrate whether its 1 Million 6 Million, Eventually they did sell 12 Million to end customers but this did not happen on Day 1, whether SF will surpass FO4 we need to wait...

 

https://www.gamespot.com/articles/fallout-4-ships-12-million-copies-in-one-day-break/1100-6432277/

 

Quote

Bethesda did not say how many of those 12 million copies shipped to retailers were actually sold through to consumers. The $750 million number likely represents the total possible revenue, if indeed all 12 million were actually sold. We've contacted Bethesda in an attempt to learn more about Fallout 4's performance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Assassins Creed said:

 

 

 

I thought this was true before reading in detail, but the reality is 12 Million Shipped to Retail and not consumers, It was 2015 times have changed now so need to celebrate whether its 1 Million 6 Million, Eventually they did sell 12 Million to end customers but this did not happen on Day 1, whether SF will surpass FO4 we need to wait...

 

https://www.gamespot.com/articles/fallout-4-ships-12-million-copies-in-one-day-break/1100-6432277/

 

 


Going by that logic they have already shipped close to 25m of Starfield to consumers!!!

Every subscriber already has a copy!! :rofl: 


They just have to hit the download button(not even actually download) to be counted as a player!! :lol: 

 

 

Considering only 5m or so bothered to hit the download,rest 1 million being on PC,physical,Early Access….it’s not something to be moonwalking about.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...