PlayStation vs Xbox vs Nintendo thread

[Takeda]

88 on Open Critic from 124 reviews. It contains total aggregate of both Xbox and PC reviews. This has more reviews than Metacritic.

 

https://opencritic.com/game/14907/starfield

 

Edited September 8, 2023 by Kazarka

[RV1709]

 

[AnK]

6 hours ago, Kazarka said:

87 on Open Critic from 124 reviews. It contains total aggregate of both Xbox and PC reviews. This has more reviews than Metacritic.

 

https://opencritic.com/game/14907/starfield

 

Fixed* 

Yet again coz of Jim Stirling single handedly  

 

15 hours ago, AnK said:

Opencritic = IGN & Random YouTuber given same entry.

 

Metacritic = IGN etc given pristine entry over no name honchos.

At this point I won’t be surprised if I see VaibhavPK,Triggr Happy & Trmin8r writing reviews for Xbox with a URL “XboxDudes” & their score given the same entry towards the aggregate as GameSpot & IGN  

 

But yeah in all fairness 87 is a definitely better score than an 85….however it may be.

Edited September 9, 2023 by AnK

[AnK]

6 hours ago, RV1709 said:

Why are there only 60 reviews?

Bethesda games are always divided coz it’s reviewed on all platforms.

 

Lot of scores are repeated on both PC & Console but a lot aren’t.

But even if you cumulate it,it would come out to be the one with most reviews in it.

 

Also unlike Opencritic which adds pretty much everyone on the fly like ppl who just started a channel & have no credibility,Metacritic only allows specific portals which match their criteria.

And even further has an aggregate  system which gives more weight to renowned sources towards the Meta.

 

Bethesda opted to give code preferences to random sources this time over reputed & renowned ones….that’s the whole controversy going on.

Edited September 9, 2023 by AnK

[Takeda]

https://www.sportskeeda.com/amp/esports/news-starfield-community-urges-players-rate-game-xbox-app-playstation-fanboys-review-bomb

 

PS fanboys making fake accounts on Microsoft store to review bomb the game. Now we know the reason behind all those negative Microsoft store reviews 

 

 

Damn you gotta commend them for the unity and hard work they putting to attack Starfield from everywhere possible direction.

Edited September 9, 2023 by Kazarka

[AnK]

Why doesn’t M$ protect its storefront from spammers like Steam & Playstation does?!

 

Or is it that the games are always free/cheap on Xbox so it’s not that difficult to submit an entry???
 

Kucchh value rakhi hoti apni toh yeh haal na hota aaj  

 

 

Anyway….As far as Metacritic is concerned I don’t think anyone looks at user scores there,Infact I don’t think many ppl look at random url portal reviews either.

 

IGN,Gamespot,Eurogamer,Edge,Game Informer,The Guardian,Metro,GamingBolt,EasyAllies, Destroctoid,GamesRyder,GameRant,Polygon,PC Gamer,GameReactor,Wired,JeuxVideo,GamePro,TheGamer,Digital Trends,PCMag,Kotaku,The Verge etc.

 

These are some of the ones ppl usually look at & have most footfall & credibility in terms of reviews.

Edited September 9, 2023 by AnK

[TRMNTR]

29 minutes ago, Kazarka said:

https://www.sportskeeda.com/amp/esports/news-starfield-community-urges-players-rate-game-xbox-app-playstation-fanboys-review-bomb

 

PS fanboys making fake accounts on Microsoft store to review bomb the game. Now we know the reason behind all those negative Microsoft store reviews 

 

 

Damn you gotta commend them for the unity and hard work they putting to attack Starfield from everywhere possible direction.

 

Khaali time bohot hai. To review padho aur review hago.

[SaiKO]

10 minutes ago, Kazarka said:

https://www.sportskeeda.com/amp/esports/news-starfield-community-urges-players-rate-game-xbox-app-playstation-fanboys-review-bomb

 

PS fanboys making fake accounts on Microsoft store to review bomb the game. Now we know the reason behind all those negative Microsoft store reviews 

 

 

Damn you gotta commend them for the unity and hard work they putting to attack Starfield from everywhere possible direction.

We can taste the state of their mind in this forum itself. Imagine being this hateful, I personally can't see them as gamers, heck, some of them didn't even complete games that are landmark for the platform they defend.

That being said, the online discourse and agenda against this game is mindboggling. Imagine people wanting a game to fail as if Todd did something bad to them.

[Takeda]

34 minutes ago, AnK said:

Why doesn’t M$ protect its storefront from spammers like Steam & Playstation does?!

 

Or is it that the games are always free/cheap on Xbox so it’s not that difficult to submit an entry???
 

Kucchh value rakhi hoti apni toh yeh haal na hota aaj  

 

 

Anyway….As far as Metacritic is concerned I don’t think anyone looks at user scores there,Infact I don’t think many ppl look at random url portal reviews either.

 

IGN,Gamespot,Eurogamer,Edge,Game Informer,The Guardian,Metro,GamingBolt,EasyAllies, Destroctoid,GamesRyder,GameRant,Polygon,PC Gamer,GameReactor,Wired,JeuxVideo,GamePro,TheGamer,Digital Trends,PCMag,Kotaku,The Verge etc.

 

These are some of the ones ppl usually look at & have most footfall & credibility in terms of reviews.

Open Critic has all those sites you mentioned whereas Metacritic didn't include Forbes score which is 9.5/10. Do you see Forbes on Metacritic? I dont see it and Forbes is massive international outlet. Let me know if u see Forbes, maybe i missed it?  

 

Look Scores will keep fluctuating up and down but all reviews should be added low and high both. Cherry picking selective review scores just to bash the game is stupid. Game is not perfect but you gotta highlight all the good ones as well along with bad ones.

 

Lot of good Playstation exclusives are between 85 and 88, if i remember correctly Ghost of Tsushima was 83 ?. Its disingenuous of some people who considered 87 or 86 is bad for Xbox game but good for PS game, you have to keep same energy.  Its not easy to hit 90 plus for every game, only few exceptional games can hit that 90 plus mark. Starfield is great but its not genre defining RPG to score 97 and 98 like BG3.

Edited September 9, 2023 by Kazarka

[Takeda]

16 minutes ago, SaiKO said:

We can taste the state of their mind in this forum itself. Imagine being this hateful, I personally can't see them as gamers, heck, some of them didn't even complete games that are landmark for the platform they defend.

That being said, the online discourse and agenda against this game is mindboggling. Imagine people wanting a game to fail as if Todd did something bad to them.

Apprantely its revenge for Xbox dudes review bombing Ratchet.

This will never stop. It always happens when big exclusives comes out.

 

Starfield would have got unlimited love if it was multiplatform game im 100% sure. Its getting heavily scrutinized unlike previous Bethesda games which were far more buggier and had lot of issues at launch include game breaking bugs and performance issues and still they received 90 plus or closed to 90. 

 

So i believe some biased exist and its not gonna change because we all have biased when it comes games and platforms we play them on.

[AnK]

Asli dukh iss baat ka hai ki na toh yeh GOAT hai,na he GOTG,GOTY,GOTM or even RPG of the month  

 

Despite having good 20-25 perfect scores from paid shill websites with Xbox/Achievement/Windows in their names itself it has tumbled down to 85 after credible reviewers who were shafted have started to open up!!

 

Par khul ke bol nahi sakte isliye gussa sara nikal raha hai random Twitter comments aur UserScores pe  

 

As if it’s the first time any exclusive is being bombarded on Twitter/UserScores  

 

Arrey bhai thoda khul ke ro kyu nahi lete baatharoom mai jaake.

 

 

 

 

Bhagwan na karre agar kahi ek do point aur khisak gaya Metacritic pe toh tum toh apni tabiyat he kharab karloge

[radicaldude]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The hypocrisy of bots (a.k.a xcucks) of the forum is mind boggling indeed. They have some self proclaimed right of sh*tting on any title for which they have to pay full price (thus not a part of a soup kitchen service) but when someone posts valid reviews about a title that they get for free, they get butthurt and start questioning if the reviews are from "actual gamers". 

 

All sorts of discourses are only justified when they are against Sony games, as the company expects them to pay the full price? Lol. What a shame. 

 

 

It's funny how some of the bots of the forum claim to be "holier than thou" but they are just the same. I suggest those bots to see their faces in the mirror everyday after waking up. 

 

 

Edited September 9, 2023 by radicaldude

[AnK]

11 minutes ago, Kazarka said:

Open Critic has all those sites you mentioned whereas Metacritic didn't include Forbes score which is 9.5/10. Do you see Forbes on Metacritic? I dont see it and Forbes is massive international outlet. Let me know if u see Forbes, maybe i missed it?  

 

Look Scores will keep fluctuating up and down but all reviews should be added low and high both. Cherry picking selective review scores just to bash the game is stupid. Game is not perfect but you gotta highlight all the good ones as well along with bad ones.

 

Lot of good Playstation exclusives are between 85 and 88, if i remember correctly Ghost of Tsushima was 83 ?. Its disingenuous of some people who considered 87 or 86 is bad for Xbox game but good for PS game, you have to keep same energy.  Its not easy to hit 90 plus for every game, only few exceptional games can hit that 90 plus mark. Starfield is great but its not genre defining RPG to score 97 and 98 like BG3.

 

No one is saying 85-87 is a bad score….

It’s just that no one ever said in the lead up of Ghost Of Tsushima or Death Stranding or FF16 or even Spider-Man that it’s going to be GOTG or GOTY blah blah.

 

I don’t see that chest thumping for Spider-Man 2 either.

 

It’s Xbots & the Shills own words that’s always mocked or poked fun at.

They should refrain from this overconfidence & things would be a lot more normal.

 

As for Opencritic Vs Metacritic.

 

Opencritic’s very USP is to have open ended aggregation but you have to agree that it’s deeply flawed,specially after the stunt M$/Bethesda tried to pull this time.

Bypassing portals that have maximum credibility & viewership to favour their YouTube/Twitter chamchas & Botwebsites that are not even designed properly.

 

They tried to have a runaway success with this game in the literal sense.

Delaying actual journalism on the game was a nasty stunt & I feel some of them are down-scoring the game just for that!!

Shouldn’t have been done & the game would have ended in the same 85ish range with a lot more good faith & future confidence on Xbox Studios Games.

 

But anyway it’s still a very good game apparently & a good kickstart to break the decade long JynX on Xbox.

Overhyping or Downplaying products being a regular consumer with nothing to gain out of it is equally bad at the end of the day,you are the one who’ll be at a loss here if you can’t judge properly which product stands where.

[SaiKO]

23 minutes ago, radicaldude said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The hypocrisy of bots (a.k.a xcucks) of the forum is mind boggling indeed. They have some self proclaimed right of sh*tting on any title for which they have to pay full price (thus not a part of a soup kitchen service) but when someone posts valid reviews about a title that they get for free, they get butthurt and start questioning if the reviews are from "actual gamers". 

 

All sorts of discourses are only justified when they are against Sony games, as the company expects them to pay the full price? Lol. What a shame. 

 

 

It's funny how some of the bots of the forum claim to be "holier than thou" but they are just the same. I suggest those bots to see their faces in the mirror everyday after waking up. 

 

 

Lol the TLOU1. I don't even have xbox yet branded as xcucks...

So I criticized re-re-release of TLOU1 multiple times for the 5k price and that's same with Starfield, how? 

Also, hats off for the time and effort you invested to dig out year old posts! Such zeal! 
 

Edited September 9, 2023 by SaiKO

[SaiKO]

And that proves I play the games, even the ones I don't agree with the price or re-re-release.

If TLOU1 was an xbox game I would have criticized it the SAME for the asking price for a re-re-release.

[radicaldude]

6 minutes ago, SaiKO said:

And that proves I play the games, even the ones I don't agree with the price or re-re-release.

 

 

 

[AnK]

14 minutes ago, SaiKO said:

And that proves I play the games, even the ones I don't agree with the price or re-re-release.

If TLOU1 was an xbox game I would have criticized it the SAME for the asking price for a re-re-release.

Lmoa I didn’t see you cribbing about The Outer-worlds Being re-released for an asking price of full MRP.

 

Truth is that you wanted to play TLOU1 in it’s full glorified ground up remake.

But didn’t want to pay for that….so you decided to abuse developers/publishers & promoted piracy even.

 

Which is pathetic!!

 

& coming here & call fellow IVG members as pathetic just coz they are discussing legitimate reviews from long time press journalists which always happens regularly,just coz you only want them flashy 10 on 10s from shills to be seen or discussed.

 

Another level of pathetic!!

Edited September 9, 2023 by AnK

[SaiKO]

6 minutes ago, AnK said:

Lmoa I didn’t see you cribbing about The Outer-worlds Being re-released for an asking price of full MRP.

 

Truth is that you wanted to play TLOU1 in it’s full glorified ground up remake.

But didn’t want to pay for that….so you decided to abuse developers/publishers & promoted piracy even.

 

Which is pathetic!!

 

& coming here & call fellow IVG members as pathetic just coz they are discussing legitimate reviews from long time press journalists which always happens regularly,just coz you only want them flashy 10 on 10s from shills to be seen or discussed.

 

Another level of pathetic!!

Outer worlds is not even my radar to have a conversation with. 
 

Speaking of pathetic, you know what is pathetic? Switching goalposts you ponies do just to bash a brand. 
 

Gamers can disagree with certain games while praising others. 
 

ponies and fanboys bash everything a brand puts out. Good games, bad games…doesn’t matter to them. 
 

That’s what you guys do. 

[Sach4life]

1 hour ago, radicaldude said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The hypocrisy of bots (a.k.a xcucks) of the forum is mind boggling indeed. They have some self proclaimed right of sh*tting on any title for which they have to pay full price (thus not a part of a soup kitchen service) but when someone posts valid reviews about a title that they get for free, they get butthurt and start questioning if the reviews are from "actual gamers". 

 

All sorts of discourses are only justified when they are against Sony games, as the company expects them to pay the full price? Lol. What a shame. 

 

 

It's funny how some of the bots of the forum claim to be "holier than thou" but they are just the same. I suggest those bots to see their faces in the mirror everyday after waking up. 

 

 

 

Those screenshots..jeez

[RV1709]

This is boring. I want to fight @TRMNTR 

 

Bring it, xbot