Jump to content

PlayStation vs Xbox vs Nintendo thread


Recommended Posts

Quote

End goal is alway how much more money they can bring in.  

 

That's how always been. Be it EA or MS or SONY or any company. This isn't charity. Even charity don't give 100% away.

 

Corporate don't a give shite about what we think. They have bosses, shareholders and other targets to hit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, El Tigre Chino said:

It's silly to put one on a pedestal over the another. End goal is alway how much more money they can bring in.  

 

I agree. 

 

 

However, Sony and Nintendo get a lot of flak for producing  remasters/remakes but others get praised (in the same sentence) for reviving a dead IPs (which they killed btw and eventually shut the original studio down. ) 

 

 

Just for reference, here's a list of Studios EA has killed so far

 

https://heavy.com/games/2017/10/studios-ea-has-killed-visceral-games/

 

 

If there is a benchmark to judge companies, it should be same, applied across the board. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, radicaldude said:

 

I agree. 

 

 

However, Sony and Nintendo get a lot of flak for producing  remasters/remakes but others get praised (in the same sentence) for reviving a dead IPs (which they killed btw and eventually shut the original studio down. ) 

 

 

Just for reference, here's a list of Studios EA has killed so far

 

https://heavy.com/games/2017/10/studios-ea-has-killed-visceral-games/

 

 

If there is a benchmark to judge companies, it should be same, applied across the board. 

 

 


:roflroll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, radicaldude said:

 

I agree. 

 

 

However, Sony and Nintendo get a lot of flak for producing  remasters/remakes but others get praised (in the same sentence) for reviving a dead IPs (which they killed btw and eventually shut the original studio down. ) 

 

 

Just for reference, here's a list of Studios EA has killed so far

 

https://heavy.com/games/2017/10/studios-ea-has-killed-visceral-games/

 

 

If there is a benchmark to judge companies, it should be same, applied across the board. 

 

 

 

If you are remaking a game, it needs to be old and forgotten. And a classic.

 

Like Dead Space.

 

If Nintendo would remake Mario 64 or Ocarina of Time, they will / were praised.

 

Re releasing previous gen games that are pretty up to date will definitely attract flak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Vaibhavp said:

 

If you are remaking a game, it needs to be old and forgotten. And a classic.

 

Like Dead Space.

 

If Nintendo would remake Mario 64 or Ocarina of Time, they will / were praised.

 

Re releasing previous gen games that are pretty up to date will definitely attract flak.

 

 

Nintendo generally remakes WII U gen games as the system got overlooked mostly. 

 

Edited by radicaldude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/31/2021 at 2:04 PM, KnackChap said:

Disc changing & buying games a headache but repeatedly replacing batteries and charging them in another device for your controller is QoL improvement. 

 

images (20).jpeg

 

Edited by 0verlord
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, radicaldude said:

 

 

Nintendo generally remakes WII U gen games as the system got overlooked mostly. 

 

Hence many would be playing those games for the first time. 

 

Most people have issue with Nintendo pricing.

 

They re release old game at $60, then don't give any discounts even a year later.

 

Or they will be releasing Metroid Dread for $60. It's graphics look more like an indie game. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Vaibhavp said:

 

Most people have issue with Nintendo pricing.

 

They re release old game at $60, then don't give any discounts even a year later.

 

Or they will be releasing Metroid Dread for $60. It's graphics look more like an indie game. 

 

 

 

How much do you think EA would charge for this remake?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, radicaldude said:

 

 

 

 

 

 


from the article

“Again, we’re not convinced the image itself is legitimate, as it could easily be a fake mocked up by, well, anyone”

 

newswf doesn’t seem convinced.. who the hell is newswf??

Edited by hsk_colossus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hsk_colossus said:


from the article

“Again, we’re not convinced the image itself is legitimate, as it could easily be a fake mocked up by, well, anyone”

 

newswf doesn’t seem convinced.. who the hell is newswf??

 

 

This is the same news a blue tick playstation blog site has posted few hours back. 

 

 

I have referenced it in the ps5 thread. 

 

 

I posted this link here just to avoid duplication

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Vaibhavp said:

 

Re release and remake are two different things.

 

Dead Space remake is definitely $70 on PS, $60 elsewhere. 

 

Looks worth it.

 

 

All the wii u titles Nintendo launches on the switch are remakes. 

 

 

They tweak the GFX, or controls or both on the switch version. 

 

 

Though I agree, some of those remakes should be $40 or less. 

Edited by radicaldude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, radicaldude said:

 

 

All the wii u titles Nintendo launches on the switch are remakes. 

 

 

They tweak the GFX, or controls or both on the switch version. 

 

 

Though I agree, some of those remakes should be $40 or less. 

 

remakes should be full price.

because the studios in question recreate the entire game from scratch, all assets, like say the DS( as in souls, not space :P ) remake or FFVII remake.

 

But then you have remasters also going on for like $60, it's not as bad as the early PS4Bone era but still, like the ME trilogy collection remaster thing now going for 4K on PC :rofl:

I'm sure it will come down in price in a year  but still EA is going to be EA

 

the DS( space this time, not souls :P ) remake is also ok, atleast EA isn't sitting on the IP shamelessly like they did with C&C, they probably have plans for it in the future also.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, radicaldude said:

If there is a benchmark to judge companies, it should be same, applied across the board. 


Here’s a radical idea,

Maybe if devoted fans stop fellatio’ing Sony and Nintendo for every minutest thing, and accept them for the money loving corporations that they are, their actions will attract less scrutiny as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Vaibhavp said:

 

Re release and remake are two different things.

 

Dead Space remake is definitely $70 on PS, $60 elsewhere. 

 

Looks worth it.

How many 3rd party games have been 70 on ps and 60 on xbox? Stop baiting everywhere. Im surprised you haven't been suspended yet, non stop baiting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Vaibhavp said:

 

Re release and remake are two different things.

 

Dead Space remake is definitely $70 on PS, $60 elsewhere. 

 

Looks worth it.

Not at all, it'll probably be 70$ for PS4 version, 80$ for PS5 with additional 10$ for haptics and trigger support. XSX will be 60$ everything included, but it'll probably be day 1 on GP anyway. 

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...