Jump to content

PlayStation vs Xbox vs Nintendo thread


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, 0verlord said:

FEK1pN6XMAAL-bF.jpg
 

Skyrim Special Edition 


Xbox 1st party game runs better on PS5 :giggle:

 

Pick any excuse from below:

1) Tools are still new, wait and watch. We will optimize.

2) Sony paid money to botch Xbox version.

3) Better games are coming, we have 18 studios bro.

4) Blaah blaaah blaaah Gamepass blaah blaah blaaah MoSht Poberrrrfulllll CONsol(ation)

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Vaibhavp said:

Frame rate and resolution wars are the worst.


There practically would have been no war regarding this aspect if Xbox marketing hadn’t falsely claimed the power advantage leading up to the launch. 
 

The shills & fanboys even projected things like PS5 won’t be able to go anywhere near the Resolution to FPS ratio of SX ,let alone outright exchange wins like it actually turned out to be. 
 

You have only them to blame for this particular topic of embarrassment. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AnK said:


There practically would have been no war regarding this aspect if Xbox marketing hadn’t falsely claimed the power advantage leading up to the launch. 
 

The shills & fanboys even projected things like PS5 won’t be able to go anywhere near the Resolution to FPS ratio of SX ,let alone outright exchange wins like it actually turned out to be. 
 

You have only them to blame for this particular topic of embarrassment. 

 

This is not true.

 

When a competent studio like id Software optimises, Series X take the lead. 

 

Skyrim cannot be used as a measure of power. Its a ps360 game. Can be any reason why they are leaving performance on table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vaibhavp said:

 

This is not true.

 

When a competent studio like id Software optimises, Series X take the lead. 

 

Skyrim cannot be used as a measure of power. Its a ps360 game. Can be any reason why they are leaving performance on table.

When SX takes lead, the studio is competent. Ok. So, when SX doesn't take the lead that studio is incompetent? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Vaibhavp said:

 

This is not true.

 

When a competent studio like id Software optimises, Series X take the lead. 


You mean to say all other studios so far were incompetent?!?

 

Also which ID game took the lead on SX?!?

 

Last I checked Doom Eternal took a trade of worse texture mapping & reflections to take the advantage of Resolution in FPS mode. 
 

Trade offs aren’t really a win!!

 

BF2042 has better resolution on PS5 but has worse reflections. 
you can’t really call that a win. 

Edited by AnK
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, gecko89 said:

When SX takes lead, the studio is competent. Ok. So, when SX doesn't take the lead that studio is incompetent? 

 

All studios are competent.

 

id Software is just known to push hardware to limits. 

 

2 minutes ago, AnK said:


You mean to say all other studios so far were incompetent?!?

 

Also which ID game took the lead on SX?!?

 

Last I checked Doom Eternal took a trade of worse texture mapping to take the advantage of Resolution in FPS mode. 
 

Trade offs aren’t really a win!!

 

BF2042 has better resolution on PS5 but has worse textures. 
you can’t really call that a win. 

 

Doom Eternal has resolution advantage on Series X. It uses variable rate shading, a feature of next gen architecture of series consoles that allows for parts of frame to have lower resolution, thereby saving processing power.

 

This feature is absent on PS5.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Vaibhavp said:

Can be any reason why they are leaving performance on table.

 

actually something is really botched up about this as even ps4 pro performed better than X1X when we clearly know X1X is much more powerful

 

same legacy code being carried forward with ps5 and xsx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching the 3rd party performance difference between two platforms for a year, the FUD that was spread by Xbox insiders before PS5 launch really aged like milk.

 

IMG_0460.jpg

 

nef0zLf.jpg

 

ogofrAK.jpg

 

690.jpg

 

Quote

"On the most recent episode of the Basement Radio Arcade Podcast, noted insider Jeff Grubb hinted that devs are having trouble with the PS5’s variable frequency approach, and warned that gamers may be “disappointed” by some major third-party titles."

 

Imagine putting these people on the pedestal as industry insiders and using them as your gaming news source :rofl: 

 

 

 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

About f**ckin time!! :rofl: 

 

Even M$ knew all along (before Bethesda acquisition) that this guy has done nothing for almost a decade except stress on BC BC BC. 
 

They literally had to give away billions of dollars to keep business afloat. 
I think now someone with streaming business know how will run the show rather than someone with console roots 
 

 

Edited by AnK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CarbonCore said:

 

Imagine putting these people on the pedestal as industry insiders and using them as your gaming news source :rofl: 

 

 

 


I can line up some of the very foolish posts by few members here aswell 

 

but it’ll lead to more mudslinging so let it be :giggle: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 0verlord said:

before consoles launch, any reasonable gamer (who isn't a hardware dev and really knows stuff) would say that one with higher sustained clock would be better than lower variable clock

Still noticeably PS5 performance if not worse is on par with XSX. Maybe future games turn out different but see no indication from devs or either MS that this will be the case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 0verlord said:

before consoles launch, any reasonable gamer (who isn't a hardware dev and really knows stuff) would say that one with higher sustained clock would be better than lower variable clock

 

 

Maybe someone who has zero clue how PC GPUs and CPUs work will say that. A 3080 runs at less than 20% its peak clock when the PC is used for web browsing or listening to music. These guys figured out a long time ago that changing frequencies based on workload is the most efficient way of doing things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


XSS is identical to big brothers only except running at 1440p - same effects, same framerate 

 

solid 1440p60 performance

 

this is how a competent dev pulls performance out of a console like XSS

 

and on 120fps it’s a mixed bag with both bigger consoles getting the upper hand in different scenarios - indeterminate

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, CarbonCore said:

Watching the 3rd party performance difference between two platforms for a year, the FUD that was spread by Xbox insiders before PS5 launch really aged like milk.

 

IMG_0460.jpg

 

nef0zLf.jpg

 

ogofrAK.jpg

 

690.jpg

 

 

Imagine putting these people on the pedestal as industry insiders and using them as your gaming news source :rofl: 

Same guys were promoting that tweet that said Valhalla would be 4K60fps on XSX only and PS5 wouldn't be able to do that. We all know how that turned out :rofl: Ubi fixed the screen tear later, by reducing resolution even further.

Screenshot-2021-11-15-19-45-52-42-40deb4

Screenshot-2021-11-15-19-45-52-42-40deb4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, CarbonCore said:

 

 

Maybe someone who has zero clue how PC GPUs and CPUs work will say that. A 3080 runs at less than 20% its peak clock when the PC is used for web browsing or listening to music. These guys figured out a long time ago that changing frequencies based on workload is the most efficient way of doing things.


How do you equate more efficiency to more power? Because “which one’s more powerful?” that’s the question.

 

PCs are super inefficient compared to consoles. Consoles are very efficient while PCs brute force their way to performance 

 

Also, Before new consoles launch, more TF was equated to more power and performance as evidenced by xbone vs PS4 and x1x vs pro, so why wouldn’t the same metric be applied on xsx vs ps5 by any reasonable gamer?

 

Edited by 0verlord
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CarbonCore said:

Watching the 3rd party performance difference between two platforms for a year, the FUD that was spread by Xbox insiders before PS5 launch really aged like milk.

 

IMG_0460.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

I dont like this console war thing but man this guy is an absoulte shill and he makes no efforts to hide it lol XD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...