Jump to content

PlayStation vs Xbox vs Nintendo thread


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, AnK said:

Edit:- Also this ain’t about console war….it’s about $pender’s $ucksess. 

 

Honestly, from a business perspective, the guy is a success. He did actually turn around MS strategy to create an entertainment box for your living room to focus on a subscription service people can't say no to. And, Satya is not a fool to invest in a guy without seeing the potential.

 

I am not gonna complain about MS lack of games anymore because they are prepared to churn out high quality AAA IPs a year or two down the line. Whether they will achieve it or not remains to be seen but people need to wait and see before judging them again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

& wait for it to be called a “Lifetime of Success” too. 
 

 

I can start a successful subscription service tmrw if all I had to do was buy & give for free….

Edited by AnK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AnK said:

I can start a successful subscription service tmrw if all I had to do was buy & give for free….

 

BxRbJNrm.jpg

 

Strategy is clearly working. It's not like he's depriving his studios of wealth by giving for free. 

 

 

On a serious note, Phil is generally loved by the gaming community, irrespective of the platform they're on. 

Not sure why you're against him or think he doesn't deserve the praise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, triggr happy ss said:

animation fighting GIF by Rough Sketchz
 

everyone after Ank’s nonsense post  :rofl:


Prithviraj Kapoor:- Bill Gates 

Raj Kapoor:-Satya Nadella 

Rishi Kapoor:-Phill Spencer 

Ranbir Kapoor:- triggr happy?!?! 
 

tumko kyu mirchi lag rahi hai bhai jo humpe personal ho rahe ho?!? 
 

Koi rishta hai kya?!? :naughty:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AnK said:

& wait for it to be called a “Lifetime of Success” too. 
 

 

I can start a successful subscription service tmrw if all I had to do was buy & give for free….

 

He is playing the long game to get people on the service and it is clearly working. How he is going to increase the profits remains to be seen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Vamos said:

 

BxRbJNrm.jpg

 

Strategy is clearly working. It's not like he's depriving his studios of wealth by giving for free. 

 

 

On a serious note, Phil is generally loved by the gaming community, irrespective of the platform they're on. 

Not sure why you're against him or think he doesn't deserve the praise. 


 

I’m just pointing out the obvious truth. 
obviously under the Microsoft umbrella they were never deprived of funds & were never going to be. 
 

They started spending this much after three generations of behemoth losses. 
(counting OGXB,RRoD,Kinnect here)

obviously wealth was never a problem. 
 

But Lifetime of individual success?!? 
I don’t so:-

 

3 minutes ago, b!T said:

remains to be seen. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Vamos said:

 

BxRbJNrm.jpg

 

Strategy is clearly working. It's not like he's depriving his studios of wealth by giving for free. 

 

 

On a serious note, Phil is generally loved by the gaming community, irrespective of the platform they're on. 

Not sure why you're against him or think he doesn't deserve the praise. 

 

MS behaviour is quiet unusual for sure.

 

You don't need to spend 70 billion to sell consoles. Just a couple of big budget games per year would be enough. 

 

On the other hand, they clearly have games like Halo Infinite that have immense potential. Looks like they aren't interested in realising it, instead are just catering to core fanbase.

 

Wondering how they take decisions like these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Vaibhavp said:

 

 

 

On the other hand, they clearly have games like Halo Infinite that have immense potential. Looks like they aren't interested in realising it, instead are just catering to core fanbase.


Destiny would still have been a Halo IP & had been Xbox exclusive for the entirety of PS4 gen. if they knew how to realise it properly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Vaibhavp said:

 

MS behaviour is quiet unusual for sure.

 

You don't need to spend 70 billion to sell consoles. Just a couple of big budget games per year would be enough. 

 

On the other hand, they clearly have games like Halo Infinite that have immense potential. Looks like they aren't interested in realising it, instead are just catering to core fanbase.

 

Wondering how they take decisions like these.

ActiBlizz 70Billion was definitely more than selling consoles. Think they're after the mobile gaming pie with King and also the PC space. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Vamos said:

 

BxRbJNrm.jpg

 

Strategy is clearly working. It's not like he's depriving his studios of wealth by giving for free. 

 

 

On a serious note, Phil is generally loved by the gaming community, irrespective of the platform they're on. 

Not sure why you're against him or think he doesn't deserve the praise. 

Strategy is working because its cheap right now and in early stages where no other player is doing the same. 

 

Ultimately it will all come to Quality of games where MS lacks big time. Acquisitions means nothing when you have  the same old Halo and Forza as front runners. 

 

This company only ruins. 

Edited by hope
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, gecko89 said:

ActiBlizz 70Billion was definitely more than selling consoles. Think they're after the mobile gaming pie with King and also the PC space. 


It was an instantaneous opportunity. 
Their first & utmost priority is obviously GamesPass & Xcloud. 
 

Maybe yes they will start to formulate a plan now for mobile games & even expand GamesPass there. 
 

 

But I don’t think they made this purchase with King in mind…..that’s just part of the whole sweet package. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AnK said:


Destiny would still have been a Halo IP & had been Xbox exclusive for the entirety of PS4 gen. if they knew how to realise it properly. 

 

That's the point.

 

Their decision making has too much of a big company feel and doesn't always make sense from the outside.

 

With Phil at least we are getting games on top of what ever adventure they are going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, hope said:

Ultimately it will all come to Quality of games where MS lacks big time. Acquisitions means nothing when you the same old Halo and Forza as front runners. 

 

Games quality is good.

 

I don't think even Nintendo games are as much fun as I had with Gears 5, Halo Infinite. They aren't hyping up the updates properly.

Edited by Vaibhavp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Vaibhavp said:

With Phil at least we are getting games on top of what ever adventure they are going on.

Peter Moore was the guy who’s success both Don Mattrick & Phill Spencer were feeding off on till the day $atya stepped in to give $pender a free hand on building GamesPass. 
 

Life time achievement of $pender that is?!? 
I don’t think so. 
 

 

Life time achievers in gaming business  are ppl like:-

 

Ken Kutaragi

Shigeru Miyamoto

Shue Yoshida 

Mark Cerny 

Gabe Newell 

Tim Sweeney

etc. 

 

 

Someone who just sitting there at the right time in the right moment & has the timeline advantage can’t be labelled an achiever.

 

I have nothing against the guy….he is genuinely very humble towards developers & gamers…

…but successful,I don’t think so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AnK said:

Peter Moore was the guy who’s success both Don Mattrick & Phill Spencer were feeding off on till the day $atya stepped in to give $pender a free hand on building GamesPass. 
 

Life time achievement of $pender that is?!? 
I don’t think so. 
 

 

Life time achievers in gaming business  are ppl like:-

 

Ken Kutaragi

Shigeru Miyamoto

Shue Yoshida 

Mark Cerny 

Gabe Newell 

Tim Sweeney

etc. 

 

 

Someone who just sitting there at the right time in the right moment & has the timeline advantage can’t be labelled an achiever.

 

I have nothing against the guy….he is genuinely very humble towards developers & gamers…

…but successful,I don’t think so. 

 

Dunno about Spencers achievements but he does mention game quality as being utmost priority in interviews. 

 

This shows with Psychonauts 2, Deathloop, both of which were delayed to achieve very high quality. 

 

Previous xbox games could release in a bit of a messy situation, that's not happening any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Vaibhavp said:

 

Dunno about Spencers achievements but he does mention game quality as being utmost priority in interviews. 

 

This shows with Psychonauts 2, Deathloop, both of which were delayed to achieve very high quality. 

 

Previous xbox games could release in a bit of a messy situation, that's not happening any more.


Like seriously man 

seriously……

 

For one instance I thought I could have a sane & sensible conversation with you….…..I guess not. 
 

Quantum Break was Spencer, Psychonauts 2 was not. 
 

Scalebound,Phantom Dust,Fable Legends,Project Spark was Spencer,Deathloop is not. 
 

Crackdown 3 was Spencer,The upcoming Elder Scrolls’s & Call of Duty’s will be not. 
 

 

You really need to realise what this guy did with the Xbox brand before Satya just decided to rebuild it with new money. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, AnK said:


Like seriously man 

seriously……

 

For one instance I thought I could have a sane & sensible conversation with you….…..I guess not. 
 

Quantum Break was Spencer, Psychonauts 2 was not. 
 

Scalebound,Phantom Dust,Fable Legends,Project Spark was Spencer,Deathloop is not. 
 

Crackdown 3 was Spencer,The upcoming Elder Scrolls’s & Call of Duty’s will be not. 
 

 

You really need to realise what this guy did with the Xbox brand before Satya just decided to rebuild it with new money. 

 

You need to get out of Xbone era.

 

Satya + Phil is what has worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Credit of what exactly dude?!? 
 

It’s just the spend of xyz money so far :rofl: 

 

Start a games subscription service (which is pretty evidently happening in all of M$ software businesses) is not really a rocket science idea….which was started with PSplus to begin with. 
 

<===Buying & Giving ===> seems real big achievement ha?! :rofl: 

 

That too with a daddy of endless pump. :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vaibhavp said:

 

Satya + Phil is what has worked.


Satya + Panda would have worked too. 
 

Go find & serve lifetime achievement award there too :lol: 

 

That was my whole point to begin with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...