Jump to content

Movie Discussion Thread Vol. 2


STICK3Rboy
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Keyofx said:

Awesome seeing all the positive Malignant reviews! It's purposely campy which mostly people who go in expecting the usual Wan Insidious/Conjuring formula wouldn't expect. The trailer and marketing really misrepresents the movie, and I feel like the user scrores on IMDb, Metacritic and RT will drop from all the people who don't get it.

Yeah, that intro had me thinkin the same, 'is that bad acting, or is it meant to be this way'.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gecko89 said:

Yeah, that intro had me thinkin the same, 'is that bad acting, or is it meant to be this way'.

 

Lol yea, that intro was a massive tell :D But then, the traditional horror-esque first act threw me off again. Acts 2 and 3 were total stylistic/tonal shifts too, so it kinda always kept you guessing. Real neat stuff.

 

Chris Stuckmann nailed it with his review:

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This just reminds me of Johnny Depp not being in it, but I'm sure Mads will be just fine.

Crimes of Grindelwald was meh, except some scenes, was my first 4DX film :P

 

P.S. Not sure about Dumbledore, but Jude Law is definitely a Fantastic Beast #NoHomo

The Young Pope Lenny Belardo GIF by Sky Italia

 

Edited by gecko89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...