Jump to content

The Coronavirus Thread Part 2


Big Boss

Recommended Posts

On 3/24/2023 at 10:47 PM, Bird Bird Bird said:

 

Pfizer hasn't sold a single vaccine in India but Pfizer should reply to IVG. 

 

We are having a general casual convo, which forums are for, I know that you don't have any personal stake in Pfizer, neither do I. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2023 at 9:39 PM, Right said:

 

She is alive yes, thankfully. But a lot of people are dropping dead.

 

Myocarditis or blood clots has become quite frequent in young ppl who took Pfizer.

Define frequent in SAE. The 1st dosage SAE is at  4 cases per one million. Not a single research article . The % increase is so negligible at statistical sense.

 

Also mRNA as vaccine tech is not new new. Ebola had same vaccine tech and sars as whole has been in research for last 10 years. None of the vaccine is unproven at any sense. If you need be something to be scared of , check Indian trials numbers(number of people taken the trial) of new medicines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gta_mad said:

Define frequent in SAE. The 1st dosage SAE is at  4 cases per one million. Not a single research article . The % increase is so negligible at statistical sense.

 

Data provided for SAE in controlled tests is unreliable, thesuggestion that SAE is pretty bad is on basis of what we are seeing in the wild. This gets highlighted only by individuals who are celebs or have public presence that public will take note of.

 

For example, DiedSuddenly has documented cases amongst athletes, which is significantly big cohot of young healthy people.

What wiuld be this number? half a million to a million tops in the US. This particular cohort has seen numbers which are far bigger than 4 per million.

 

Now there are two ways to look at it. One that athletes go through a lot rigourous cardiovascular regime than normal person and they are more susceptible to SAE like myocarditis, second that similar SAE can be seen in non-athletes just that it doesnt come to limelight. That is scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Right said:

 

Data provided for SAE in controlled tests is unreliable, thesuggestion that SAE is pretty bad is on basis of what we are seeing in the wild. This gets highlighted only by individuals who are celebs or have public presence that public will take note of.

 

For example, DiedSuddenly has documented cases amongst athletes, which is significantly big cohot of young healthy people.

What wiuld be this number? half a million to a million tops in the US. This particular cohort has seen numbers which are far bigger than 4 per million.

 

Now there are two ways to look at it. One that athletes go through a lot rigourous cardiovascular regime than normal person and they are more susceptible to SAE like myocarditis, second that similar SAE can be seen in non-athletes just that it doesnt come to limelight. That is scary.

If that's the case. The sampling strategy is wrong. The point of rct is that you even out extreme edge cases and try to find a statistical validation for the population. You can't just call a trial unreliable without a valid data

And the sample for covishield,Pfizer and moderna vaccine was pretty diverse. For your example, how do we know there wasn't some pre existing complicacy (it goes both ways)

 

Also SAE reporting/rare disease isn't something hidden atleast for fda or Ema. They have very structured way of reporting. I really doubt that it will not be recorded and patient history won't be checked. If it was a widespread issue it is bound to come to limelight.

 

The data isn't there to identify this a direct correlation. Not a single peer reviewed paper has proven this as direct correlation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Right said:

 

Data provided for SAE in controlled tests is unreliable, thesuggestion that SAE is pretty bad is on basis of what we are seeing in the wild. This gets highlighted only by individuals who are celebs or have public presence that public will take note of.

 

For example, DiedSuddenly has documented cases amongst athletes, which is significantly big cohot of young healthy people.

What wiuld be this number? half a million to a million tops in the US. This particular cohort has seen numbers which are far bigger than 4 per million.

 

Now there are two ways to look at it. One that athletes go through a lot rigourous cardiovascular regime than normal person and they are more susceptible to SAE like myocarditis, second that similar SAE can be seen in non-athletes just that it doesnt come to limelight. That is scary.

 

Anecdotel experience is not evidence. Thats the most basic fallacy non researchers make. 

What's your basis of calling SAE reporting as unreliable ? 

The Covid India death toll is unreliable due to reporting biases in reporting modality - that's something we consistently know. On what basis are you throwing numbers like "magnitude of 3 or 4" whatever ? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/7/2023 at 7:00 AM, Bhpian Bali said:

Daily Covid cases top 5k as Delhi, Kerala see sharp rise  https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/daily-covid-cases-top-5k-as-delhi-kerala-see-sharp-rise/articleshow/99309054.cms Download the TOI app now: https://timesofindia.onelink.me/mjFd/toisupershare

 

 

Yeh kya fir shuru ho gaya?

Market gira de bus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
5 minutes ago, Big Boss said:

Isn't he the same guy who said Jews learnt evil from Nazis :roflroll:

 

Who?

But that's politics, and even the brightest and sharpest people of science can have dumb political opinions.

 

point is that his political opinions will be used to discredit his science, and that is dangerous.

Edited by Right
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Right said:

 

Who?

But that's politics, and even the brightest and sharpest people of science can have dumb political opinions.

 

point is that his political opinions will be used to discredit his science, and that is dangerous.

Ya that's dangerous. Legit evidences are dismissed just because of political stands 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...