Jump to content

Battlefield 2042


hazard12345
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Joe Cool said:

They already tried SP multiple times and turned garbage only. Total waste. Rather they improved MP and expanded it. 

 

3, 4, Hardline, V all had bad campaigns. Even the length kept getting shorter with each. V had 3 SP missions... 

 

Only BF1 had a good campaign out of last 5 BF games and that was due to war stories and not traditional campaign. 

I really liked the campaign of bf3 and right now I’m revisiting bf1 just to play the campaign and wow the campaign is so damn good!

shame that they’re giving up on.SP campaigns 

ah well ….more focus on making MP better I guess

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KrIzAliD said:

optimized?  isnt this a next gen title? 

 

wth

 

It can mean a lot of things.

 

Quote

Games featuring the Optimised for Xbox Series X|S icon will showcase unparalleled load-times, heightened visuals and steadier framerates at up to 120FPS. These include new titles built natively using the Xbox Series X|S development environment as well as previously released titles that have been rebuilt specifically for Xbox Series X|S.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Joe Cool said:

image.png

 

Battlefield 2042 reveal trailer has more likes in 12 hours than the total dislikes BFV reveal trailer amassed over 3 years. Trending #1 worldwide. :thumbsup:

 

 

So many 'This is Battlefield' moments. 😌

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnJqyRgL-Tg

 

the original epic synced

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't believe they made a trailer out of Only in Battlefield moments.

Would have preferred a "traditional" trailer instead, but thank god they're back in the modern era with sorta futuristic things.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, radicaldude said:

 

Making an MP only game is okay. Charging $70 for it is not. 

 

Atleast for $70 sony mostly gives you an unforgettable single player experience (leaving niche titles like demons souls, returnal etc.) However, MP experiences mostly depend on your skill level/your team's skill level/your opponents skill levels/ other factors. 

Coz MP offers more value than SP? MP = endless content for you to play.  Charging 70 for SP only game is ethically wrong and we all know which company is notorious for charging 70 for SP only games. 

 

If you can pay 70$ for games like Returnal and Sackboy then why can't EA charge 70 for legendary franchise like BF?

 

 

Edited by WhiteWolf
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, They giving you free map packs and all.

 

 

70$ is a new  norm. People should accept it and stop complaining about it. I used to complain about it but now i accepted it

 

 

MS will do same soon 

Edited by WhiteWolf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...