Jump to content

Spider-Man 2


Heaven Angel
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Purana Khiladi said:

Lol It just the 2nd spidey game. They are going fast forward i think, there was no need to introduce miles so early and now we are getting Venom as well. 

Yeah, too early. 

 

5 hours ago, rushab oswal said:

We still take him seriously ? 

One of his better, serious videos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Purana Khiladi said:

Lol It just the 2nd spidey game. They are going fast forward i think, there was no need to introduce miles so early and now we are getting Venom as well. 


The license with Marvel is temporary.

They can’t make Spider-Man games forever.

 

It’s already been 7 years since they have it publicly…..maybe 10 years in all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, AnK said:


The license with Marvel is temporary.

They can’t make Spider-Man games forever.

 

It’s already been 7 years since they have it publicly…..maybe 10 years in all.

Valid Point Sir

 

But

 

Marvel be like take everything we have for lifetime and give us to the moolah like the first game :P 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Purana Khiladi said:

Valid Point Sir

 

But

 

Marvel be like take everything we have for lifetime and give us to the moolah like the first game :P 


Disney is already in talks in entering into games development/Publishing on their own.

Possibly through acquisition or mergers.

 

I think creatively Sony & Insomniac did the right thing in making epic bangers within the timeframe they have rather than going slow & sturdy which WB games & Rocksteady did with Batman.

 

I thing a big expansion/dlc for Spider-Man 2 & will be about it for Insomniac/PS’s Spider-Man franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2023 at 10:25 AM, AnK said:

 

Quote

I think creatively Sony & Insomniac did the right thing in making epic bangers within the timeframe they have rather than going slow & sturdy which WB games & Rocksteady did with Batman.

Rocksteady didn't go slow and steady. Asylum came out in 2009, City came out in 2011 and Knight came out in 2015 which were all normal gaps. The reason their new game hasn't come out yet is because they f**ked up hard.
 

Quote

I thing a big expansion/dlc for Spider-Man 2 & will be about it for Insomniac/PS’s Spider-Man franchise.

Why wouldn't Disney let them make a third?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kumar123 said:

Rocksteady didn't go slow and steady. Asylum came out in 2009, City came out in 2011 and Knight came out in 2015 which were all normal gaps. The reason their new game hasn't come out yet is because they f**ked up hard.


If you include Origins & then Gotham Knights they have made(WB games) 5 mainline games plus massive expansions & the 6th on it’s way in the same universe already.

 

While Sony has just made 2.5

 

1 hour ago, Kumar123 said:

Why wouldn't Disney let them make a third?


Because they are trying to get into Games Development themselves with a rumoured merger/acquisition of EA games.

 

Point he was making was why Sony/Insomniac is scripting the biggest characters & showdowns in such a short(Play)time.


Answer is that they have this IP for a very limited time unlike WBgames.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/10/2023 at 9:38 PM, AnK said:


The license with Marvel is temporary.

They can’t make Spider-Man games forever.

 

It’s already been 7 years since they have it publicly…..maybe 10 years in all.

Sony isn't letting go of that IP so easily. They have had the Spider-Man license in movies for so long and Marvel couldnt do anything about it when they wanted Spidey in Avengers and Sony was just not letting it happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, hazard12345 said:

Enjoy. Still have 1 year of backlog left. 🫡

change your backlog from a queue to a stack, so you can play latest releases first and push old games even further back. :punk:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ZooZoo said:

Sony isn't letting go of that IP so easily. They have had the Spider-Man license in movies for so long and Marvel couldnt do anything about it when they wanted Spidey in Avengers and Sony was just not letting it happen. 


That was the entire deal.

 

Sony & Marvel collaborated for MCU with Marvel getting Spidey in avengers & Sony getting to make joint production for MCU & Spiderverse.

 

Till the time that deal is lasting Sony can negotiate but after that they can’t.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...