Banz Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 I think they want to rest the bowlers , else they would have never posted such high score in the 1st innings.. Even last game vinay kumar and 1 more bowler was rested.. They should have just played the reserve bowlers then. Why would they go into a match so unprepared? Even bowling with part-timers for the 2nd innings would have been a better strategy than batting on. They are supposed to be the team to beat this season, and they should play like one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 (edited) Rohit ShamraArre Saar, aapne kyun takleef ki. Aaram kijiye, aur apne hamstring ki massage karaiye....dhoni tel leke aata hi hoga. Edited February 1, 2015 by Right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtheK Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 Arre Saar, aapne kyun takleef ki. Aaram kijiye, aur apne hamstring ki massage karaiye....dhoni tel leke aata hi hoga. Jai ho CD baba ki.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentassassin Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 They should have just played the reserve bowlers then. Why would they go into a match so unprepared? Even bowling with part-timers for the 2nd innings would have been a better strategy than batting on. They are supposed to be the team to beat this season, and they should play like one. Our top order is collapsing very quickly..Most games we are 80 - 4 , 120 - 5.. CM gautam , S.Gopal are getting the runs in the lower order and saving the team... So guess they wanted to give some practice to top order..One of my friends who follow domestic cricket very closely told me this.. Seems more appropriate reason than resting the bowlers.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Boss Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 Vidarbha beat Delhi by an innings My friend Shalabh is in great form. Made 2 100s, 95, 75 and 50 already. Got MOM once too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ph3N0M Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 (edited) MC BC ESPN harami saala: http://www.redmondpie.com/espn-brings-cricket-world-cup-2015-live-stream-without-cable-subscription/ BC 99 dollars! Are there any cheaper options of watching it in the States? Edited February 1, 2015 by Ph3N0M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Params7 Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 ^pirate streams shouldn't be hard to find. Its hard being a cricket fan in the States. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewie Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 we wont give it back it seems star sports has a way of coming up with the most asinine promos. all of which come back to bite us in the a*s. they seem to enjoy trolling indian fans dhawan giving all those gabbar expressions in the promo he'll have plenty of time to practice those in the mirror after he's out in the first over so what happens when we lose. bcci will still hold onto it & say "main na doonga" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtheK Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 Worst though is angrezo ki pungi, nothing beats that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playstation Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 World Cup 2015: Big B excited about 'debut' in Indo-Pak matchhttp://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-world-cup-2015-big-b-excited-about-debut-in-indo-pak-match-2057599 Amitabh Bachpan ...commentary karega...sahi hai. Woh match pura world dekhega....Uss din... Chicken...mutton...machli...speaker lega ke dekhenga.....Inn pakistani yo ko haro...India bakhi toh jyada aage jane wala hai nahi tum log. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentassassin Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 Worst though is angrezo ki pungi, nothing beats that Yea..That was really embarrassing.. ironically Angrezone bjadhiya hamari pungi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playstation Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 MC BC ESPN harami saala: http://www.redmondpie.com/espn-brings-cricket-world-cup-2015-live-stream-without-cable-subscription/ BC 99 dollars! Are there any cheaper options of watching it in the States? last year Football world cup online dekha tha on sony max website for just Rs 99...yeh time agar star sports karta hai online toh dekhna..shayad Rs 100-200 mein ho jaye...Bakhi speed ka tension hoga nahi ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playstation Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 @phenom, bhai bol toh rahe hai ki online streaming hoga..but when i went to website could not find anything. StarSports.com to stream ICC Cricket WC 2015 in four languageshttps://account.starsports.com/star-package Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 Worst though is angrezo ki pungi, nothing beats that1. Pungi2. Aane do 3. Won't give it back First 2 backfired, 3rd is sure to be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewie Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 1983- India won the World Cup. 1984- India lost the Test Series 1-2 to England at home. 1985- India didnt lose a single game when they won World Championship of cricket. 1986- India lost to Pakistan in Australasia Cup due to six from Javed Miandad. 1986- India won the Lord's test. 2011- India won the World Cup. 2012- India lost the Test Series 1-2 to England at home. 2013- India didnt lose a single game when they won the ICC Champions Trophy. 2014- India lost to Pakistan in Asia Cup due to six from Shahid Afridi. 2014- India won the Lord's test. so this means 2015 india s/f exit in WC? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtheK Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ph3N0M Posted February 3, 2015 Report Share Posted February 3, 2015 Mohit bhai, even if star sorts does stream it online, I'm sure it'll be geo-restricted to Indian viewers only. I also watched the T20 world cup on star sports online. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted February 3, 2015 Report Share Posted February 3, 2015 (edited) voted for south africa Wait so last years Dota 2 International had a bigger prize pool than the World Cup of cricket? This is the best the ICC BCCI could cough up? Because it's the no. 1 sport in bunch of gareeb desh and in rich nations it's fairly low on the totem pole. Edited February 3, 2015 by Nemo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentassassin Posted February 3, 2015 Report Share Posted February 3, 2015 70 ball 100 for Taylor.. 112 from 88 balls for williamson.. NZ are in fine form..All their batsmen are in really good form.. Mcculum , Taylor and Willaimson especially have scored plenty of runs from an year or so.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentassassin Posted February 3, 2015 Report Share Posted February 3, 2015 Ishant Sharma has taken 187 wickets in 61 Tests, at an average of nearly 40, and managed only six five-wicket hauls. Does anyone have worse figures than this? Of the 171 bowlers who have now taken 100 or more Test wickets, there are 11 with worse averages than Ishant Sharma's, which is currently 37.30. Easily the worst of all the 100-wicket men is the West Indian allrounder Carl Hooper (114 at 49.42), and then come Nicky Boje (South Africa; 100 at 42.65), Ravi Shastri (India; 151 at 40.96), Mohammad Rafique (Bangladesh; 100 at 40.76), Ashley Giles (England; 143 at 40.60), Doug Wright (England; 108 at 39.11), John Emburey (England; 147 at 37.87), Paul Harris (South Africa; 103 at 37.87), Fidel Edwards (West Indies; 165 at 37.87), Dilhara Fernando (Sri Lanka; 100 at 37.84) and Phil Tufnell (England; 121 at 37.68). Most of them are spinners, apart from Edwards and Fernando. As for five-wicket hauls, the only bowlers to have taken more wickets than Sharma with fewer five-fors are Andrew Flintoff (226 wickets, but only three five-wicket hauls) and Jacques Kallis (292 and five). Garry Sobers (235 wickets) and Morne Morkel (currently 217) also took six five-fors. http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/826053.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts