Jump to content

The Old Cricket Thread


vinitwins
 Share

WC T20  

44 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Also, everyone who follows cricket, must know that highest score by an Australian batsman is 380, by Hayden. Maybe only you don't :tongue:

 

jesus !!! didnt i acknowledge earlier that i missed that :doh:<_<

 

ofcourse the highest ever is 380 but remember it came against a bunch of school kids ( read : zimbabwe )

 

Aussies revere the great Don to the point where they won't go past his record unless it's absolutely necessary. Even Mark Taylor declared unbeaten on 334. :majesty:

 

Not suggesting hayden doesn't respect bradman.

Edited by Jigsaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It (Brett Lee pic) was for Gene McGrath day, nice gesture.

 

Also Jiggy, Bradman's personal best score is not a record, I mean this way everybody's best score will be a record. Chaos.

 

Dude have you not taken your medicines today??

 

I never said bradman's best is a world or any sort of record. What part of my sentence is so difficult for you to comprehend? All you have is one lame-a$$ argument about how hayden's 380 and not bradman's 334 is an aussie highest in Test match cricket. And i already have accepted i missed out mentioning hayden earlier.

 

chale aate hain mooh utha ke <_<

Edited by Jigsaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also clarke was just 5 runs behind bradman and an aussie's highest 334.... Takes some real balls to declare like that :majesty:shows the kind of sporting attitude and probably even a mark of respect for bradman that the aussies have. :good:

Dude have you not taken your medicines today??I never said bradman's best is a world or any sort of record. What part of my sentence is so difficult for you to comprehend? All you have is one lame-a$$ argument about how hayden's 380 and not bradman's 334 is an aussie highest in Test match cricket. And i already have accepted i missed out mentioning hayden earlier.chale aate hain mooh utha ke <_<

 

so the score is NOT a record of ANY sorts still it would take balls to declare when it is in reach, wow.

 

foot-in-mouth2.jpeg

 

 

Every wall has a gate.

It was a very good ball, but hey you did not watch it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so the score is NOT a record of ANY sorts still it would take balls to declare when it is in reach, wow.

 

 

 

You really need comprehension classes. Like badly!!

 

I'll slow down just for you and repeat.

 

Clarke was 5 runs away from beating bradman's highest test score. Something that even Mark Taylor didn't want to surpass and hence Taylor declared on 334. Clarke declared on 329.

 

It's ok to try to act like a smarta$$ but ATLEAST don't humiliate yourself in the process. Time to shove that foot now up your colon.

Edited by Jigsaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

dude I was not trolling, your first comment never included Mark Taylor, please scroll back a a few pages and you said that it required balls to declare then.

I was rather amused by this, that is all.

Also I was shocked when he actually did not go for 400 as he could have got it seeing our bowling and fielding.

 

 

Also. not compare me with Ambar, not him <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dude I was not trolling, your first comment never included Mark Taylor, please scroll back a a few pages and you said that it required balls to declare then.

I was rather amused by this, that is all.

Also I was shocked when he actually did not go for 400 as he could have got it seeing our bowling and fielding.

 

 

Also. not compare me with Ambar, not him <_<

 

 

Yup. Compare him with Zodak or lower.

 

:giggle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dude I was not trolling, your first comment never included Mark Taylor, please scroll back a a few pages and you said that it required balls to declare then.

 

Again? :doh:

 

Really? Read that post a few times. And then again.

 

I said Clarke showed balls by declaring 5 runs away from bradman's highest. Something that most Aussies greatly revere.

God!! :suicide:

 

Find a better hobby mate. You clearly lack basic comprehension skills to even handle an argument.

Edited by Jigsaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again? :doh:

 

Really? Read that post a few times. And then again.

 

I said Clarke showed balls by declaring 5 runs away from bradman's highest. Something that most Aussies greatly revere.

God!! :suicide:

 

Find a better hobby mate. You clearly lack basic comprehension skills to even handle an argument.

 

But Don Bradman's highest was surpassed by Matthew Hayden with a score of 380 a few years back.

Clarke showed justice to the Legend.Appreciate him for that. ;)

Edited by Exhiotic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • AtheK changed the title to The Old Cricket Thread
  • AtheK locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...