Noctis Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Gamespot review 8.5 And the same score for the PS3 and x360 version. Spot on prediction from my part as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarketTantrik Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 The video frame in Karooo's GS post.... Lightning has a mustache. Manly chick indeed. FF13 = Manly GirlFFV13 = Girly Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulovski Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 And the same score for the PS3 and x360 version. Spot on prediction from my part as well. Which is kinda stupid on GS part - giving both of them the same score when the 360 version is blatantly worse in the graphics department. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarbonCore Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 And the same score for the PS3 and x360 version. Spot on prediction from my part as well. 360 version cannot be scored less than PS3 version, its a mathematical impossibility. In worst case scenarios, they can be equal at most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Which is kinda stupid on GS part - giving both of them the same score when the 360 version is blatantly worse in the graphics department. Like I said I don't really believe in just calling these sites fanboys. Its business for them, their ratings and articles have a huge impact on game sales and I wouldn't be surprised that publishers would be pulling some strings. edit: guess Im just whining because the Japanese VA did not get included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shockwave Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Which is kinda stupid on GS part - giving both of them the same score when the 360 version is blatantly worse in the graphics department. Ya but going by the pictorial comparison there's hardly any difference. For sure PS3 version is visually superior, but technically both are same. Now if it was infested with glitches it would have been a completely different thing. But still 360 version deserved a lower score. May be 8.3 or .2. Both MS and SE need to gulp that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulovski Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Here's the difference boiled down from the DF article: PS3 wins on resolution and cutscenes and just about everything; 360 has better framerate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Ya but going by the pictorial comparison there's hardly any difference. For sure PS3 version is visually superior, but technically both are same. Now if it was infested with glitches it would have been a completely different thing. But still 360 version deserved a lower score. May be 8.3 or .2. Both MS and SE need to gulp that. Everyone who tried it out says the 360 version is noticeably inferior. Its not just 720p native vs 576p, but the overall 360 code has been rushed and limited by the engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Wright Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 360 version cannot be scored less than PS3 version, its a mathematical impossibility. In worst case scenarios, they can be equal at most. This man speaks the truth. If it is undeniably worse, just don't publish a review. That's how these things work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarbonCore Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Checkout their Bayonetta scores btw for both 360 and PS3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karooo Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 RPG Site : 85% ps3, 70% 360. http://ps3.rpgsite.net/reviews/42/208/fina...360-review.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Checkout their Bayonetta scores btw for both 360 and PS3. True, this should have clearly been a 7.5/8.5 or a 8/8.5 at least going by that standard. On the brighter side most gamers will check out FF13 comparisons in particular and this will just hurt the reputation of the reviewers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Wright Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 True, this should have clearly been a 7.5/8.5 or a 8/8.5 at least going by that standard. On the brighter side most gamers will check out FF13 comparisons in particular and this will just hurt the reputation of the reviewers. As if it need any more hurting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarbonCore Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 RPG Site : 85% ps3, 70% 360. http://ps3.rpgsite.net/reviews/42/208/fina...360-review.html Was just reading that. I thought resolution was the only thing lacking in 360 version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulovski Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 I generally like GS reviews - they don't rush it like other sites, and more or less spoiler free, and not too disparaging. But this was a complete rush job on the reviews. IVG reviews are the best - completely unbiased as in the case of bioware games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 As if it need any more hurting. Maybe not among us, but there are hundreds of thousands of gamers still making purchase decisions based on a few sites like IGN, Gamespot etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Wright Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Hey! Here's a conspiracy theory I just thought of. "FFXIII is this linear because they didn't want people complaining about switching discs" Maybe not among us, but there are hundreds of thousands of gamers still making purchase decisions based on a few sites like IGN, Gamespot etc. True. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karooo Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=237956 Great article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Wright Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 ^ Yes, yes and YES! Everything I wanted to say in one article. Brilliant. I really don't f**king get the hate for this game. It's f**king stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shockwave Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Was just reading that. I thought resolution was the only thing lacking in 360 version. Same here, but it is still pretty much the case. RPGSite review has been one of the better so far, by treating both versions separately. I am surprised SE didn't include those CGI cut scenes in HD. What a sad thing to do for their biggest franchise. And this is their 3rd friggin 360 game. By the way, isn't 720p = 1280x720? How does the reviewer says 1024x768 for the PS3 resolution then? I am confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.