Shantz Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 a very unique concept no doubt...but i think people can have different opinions as for hiding...some guys who know the map well can manipulate this thing easily...like running around in safe places or around the same place only etc etc...and it will become nearly impossible for people to say who is hiding who is not...pata nai i can b wrong also... and what about the prizes but but but beachhead is quite an open map.. we can say that if you stay in your camp (or for HGH, in that small building next to main camp) and even if you run around in it (or near its periphery) that means disqualified... And lets keep Dan as the judge. His judgement as to one was avoiding combat or not will be made unquestionable. So if he says that even the winner was using that tactic, then he will be disqualified, no questions asked.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shantz Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 dont u think u should add min required kills aswell ? like players should have atleast 50kills and out of those players who have 50+kills the one who has least deaths wins.. this will avoid camping/running to safe spots again n again excellent idea..but lets not keep it fixed number.. it can be made like 20-30% of max kills scored in the match by anyone... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killzone123 Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 but but but beachhead is quite an open map.. we can say that if you stay in your camp (or for HGH, in that small building next to main camp) and even if you run around in it (or near its periphery) that means disqualified... And lets keep Dan as the judge. His judgement as to one was avoiding combat or not will be made unquestionable. So if he says that even the winner was using that tactic, then he will be disqualified, no questions asked.... will dan be able to monitor all the total 15-16 etc players at the same time...and getting your a*s saved smartly for a few seconds also can make a difference to your final score...thats what i feel...and also if we let other people complain if they saw anyone hiding etc then we can have good arguement for sure between the concerned parties...the idea is really unique and excellent hats off to dan for thinking it..but how successful it will be in implementing thats the biggest question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Like kz123 said, its very hard to define hiding and this could lead to a lot of unnecessary arguments after the game. But cool and interesting challenge though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rAgHaV Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 excellent idea..but lets not keep it fixed number.. it can be made like 20-30% of max kills scored in the match by anyone... fixed number will be a better idea.. like this no one will have to do calculations in game if every mode is 15min long then the kill target can be = 90 kills (easily anyone can get that many kills as beachhead is a very small map and ur kph will always be high) if it's normal 5 min then target can be 30kills.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rAgHaV Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 or another idea.. players should have atleast 50 (depends on the game length) MISSION POINTS.. and those who have 50mission points out of them the one with the least deaths can win let dan decide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joy Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Lol this is gonna be great , but on this map if having less deaths is priority then ground and air bots play a crucial factor I think. As staying close to base and letting bots do all the killing is a advantage I think and as Ragz said having a fixed no. of kills to get will ensure that everyone plays offensively to get to that fixed no. first instead of camping and minimizing his deaths. Still a unique challenge which will be something different as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shantz Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 will dan be able to monitor all the total 15-16 etc players at the same time...and getting your a*s saved smartly for a few seconds also can make a difference to your final score...thats what i feel...and also if we let other people complain if they saw anyone hiding etc then we can have good arguement for sure between the concerned parties...the idea is really unique and excellent hats off to dan for thinking it..but how successful it will be in implementing thats the biggest question I'm not saying he should monitor this in the game. But this will be done after the game from the battle replay. Otherwise no one can detect hiding etc much...Also anyone can complain, I'm just saying decision should be his... fixed number will be a better idea.. like this no one will have to do calculations in game if every mode is 15min long then the kill target can be = 90 kills (easily anyone can get that many kills as beachhead is a very small map and ur kph will always be high) if it's normal 5 min then target can be 30kills.. Fixed number is not good because you can't be sure what number is a good number.. For all you know 50 might be too high or too low...% of max kills is a good estimate of the match in question. Also, this calculation does not have to be done in the game, but when the match is done, we will check it from last screen/battle replay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rAgHaV Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 yeah i think shantz is right.. so it can be like this IMO kill's needed = 50% of the number of kills obtained by the person who has the max number of kills.. and then out of those persons who qualify the one with least deaths can win... and if there is a tie then u can take mission points into consideration.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shantz Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 on a compltely unrelated note.. does a friendly kill show up as a kill on the scoreboard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabba Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Just noticed.. FF is already on now i will not go to opposition for killing anyone.. will kill my own team members make me proud it is ON also BAN HOEFAG from these challenges y ban when u can kill him no matter which team he is in... thus increasing his deaths n thus eliminating his chances for a win on a compltely unrelated note.. does a friendly kill show up as a kill on the scoreboard? i like the way u think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rashmeet Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shantz Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 .... kya mitaya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDribbler Posted August 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 Thx everyone for inputs...... Following will be implemented: - Minimum Death tally still remains the main criteria to win. But in addition..the player has to have minimum 50 mission points....as this game is gonna be a longer duration based game. (Itz obvious player with less death and high mission points ie 50 and above will be the winner) - Its going to be a ranked match and the battle replay will be scrutinized before declaring the winner. - Anyone camping in base or hiding for more than a min, reported either in game or seen in battle replay is subjected to DQ. Finally..lol.. FF is ON for one major reason... U see any player leading... with minimum deaths.. all can go kill him together and increase his death count... Thaz the mindfuk idea... Read the challenge title "Survival Challenge" ....... All for himself in this epic battle. "Nowhere to run.. Nowhere to hide" And this beachhead map is the best open map for it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
achilles Posted August 11, 2009 Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 is the battle replay accurate..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDribbler Posted August 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 is the battle replay accurate..? That is the second alternative after in-game reports. But me still hv faith. that gi members will play fair... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abhi90 Posted August 11, 2009 Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 dan another GI challenge when i cannot take part take this and Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDribbler Posted August 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 another GI challenge when i cannot take part Sony ka gussa mere pe kyo nikaal raha hai. ye le btw..this challenge is my bday treat Jhanda leke paida hua mein !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rAgHaV Posted August 11, 2009 Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 Finally..lol.. FF is ON for one major reason... U see any player leading... with minimum deaths.. all can go kill him together and increase his death count... Thaz the mindfuk idea... Read the challenge title "Survival Challenge" ....... All for himself in this epic battle. "Nowhere to run.. Nowhere to hide" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
achilles Posted August 11, 2009 Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 Sony ka gussa mere pe kyo nikaal raha hai. ye le btw..this challenge is my bday treat Jhanda leke paida hua mein !!!! so.. it's like a treat.. sabko milna mangta hai ye.. so the person with max deaths read : me shud also win something n btw.. th concept is jus so cool.. dunno if any1 can play fair in this one jo dikha usko lol. reminds me of the trailer of quick gun murugun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.