Right Posted September 21, 2013 Report Share Posted September 21, 2013 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/I-am-still-opposed-to-Sonia-becoming-PM-Sushma-Swaraj-says/articleshow/22770784.cms I see this as a desperate move to stay relevant in national politics following Monster Modi's rise on the national scene, pertinent to mention that it was the same maneuver that gave a major impetus to Sushma Swaraj's political career back in 2004. Also in recent context, many Indians were seen crying on the racial slur against the anointment of an Indian American as Miss America, and yet the same racial bias goes on unabated in the upper echelons of Indian polity, what else can be expected from the society at large. Hypocrisy anyone ? That post was so poor even for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sa1nT_SoLd1eR Posted September 21, 2013 Report Share Posted September 21, 2013 if an RSS bot finds it poor then that means it rocks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted September 21, 2013 Report Share Posted September 21, 2013 Sonia gandhi Modi Swaraj Miss America Racism Absolutely, the half-serious twitter/fb racism against a beauty pageant winner is same as opposing a nonnative staking her claim on country's PMship. Please continue putting 5 different things and together and try to make sense out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sa1nT_SoLd1eR Posted September 21, 2013 Report Share Posted September 21, 2013 Firstly, not my fault that you are intellectually inept on the deeper psychological & sociological context between both. Secondly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playstation Posted September 21, 2013 Report Share Posted September 21, 2013 India's development of ICBMs likely to fuel arms race with China NEW DELHI: India's development of ICBMs is likely to see China deploy its own MIRV missiles which can carry multiple warheads, leading to an intense arms race in the region, says a new report on global nuclear weapons by renowned US experts. The report says that the decision by China and India to equip their ballistic missiles with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) will influence the global nuclear stockpile trends. Described by Indian scientists as an ICBM, Agni V is not likely to carry multiple manoeuvrable warheads or MIRVS but its successors, including Agni VI, are likely to have the technology. "Indian officials have already said that a new ICBM their country is developing will be capable of carrying multiple warheads. This development, combined with increased US missile defense capabilities in the Pacific region, could motivate China to deploy MIRV-capable missiles as well," says the report titled Global Nuclear Weapons Inventories, 1945-2013. The report is authored by Federation of American Scientists' Hans Kristensen and Robert Norris. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-09-18/india/42182306_1_china-and-india-hans-kristensen-warheads Their arm race is with USA and they are doing excellent job catching up..whereas we fooling around ......paying billions to them russians for things had just blow up in middle of an ocean ....or come crashing while our pilots are learning to fly..... Israel is much better partner ...i am glad India did not shun them under pressure from religious groups here....thanks to them some world class millitary stuff we have ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted September 21, 2013 Report Share Posted September 21, 2013 Firstly, not my fault that you are intellectually inept on the deeper psychological & sociological context between both. Secondly Yea. The logic in those lines is comprehensible only to the whiz kids like you.Psychological & sociological....May be also constitutional? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sa1nT_SoLd1eR Posted September 21, 2013 Report Share Posted September 21, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sa1nT_SoLd1eR Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-09-21/india/42271814_1_sadiq-jamal-encounter-case-tulsiram-prajapati Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Posted September 23, 2013 Report Share Posted September 23, 2013 Just came back from local gas agency, AADHAR nightmare and chaos. One of the old age poor person told me that he has given aadhar copies 4 times so far but it's still not linked and he hasn't got the subsidy. There were at least 50 people sweating to get AADHAR linked. Bangalore, ch***a Nandan ki jamanat jabt honi chahiye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ne0 Posted September 25, 2013 Report Share Posted September 25, 2013 Sad day for india , now I guess stuff like corruption / dishonesty has become so commonplace , its become part and parcel of everyday life .... especially when the govt thinks convicted guys can stay elected too http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Convicted-MPs-MLAs-to-stay-put-despite-SC-order/articleshow/23014961.cms The Union Cabinet on Tuesday cleared an ordinance to neutralize Supreme Court's order mandating instant disqualification of MPs and members of state legislatures convicted for offences carrying sentence of two years or more, in a move which instantly came to be seen as designed to protect RJD chief Lalu Prasad. The ordinance, which is likely to be sent shortly to President Pranab Mukherjee for promulgation, comes a week before a trial court in Jharkhand is expected to deliver its verdict onLalu's complicity in the fodder scam. The RJD boss had unsuccessfully petitioned the apex court complaining about the alleged bias of the trial court and seeking transfer of the case to another judge. "It is a thanksgiving gesture to Lalu ji," a minister told TOI after Cabinet cleared the proposed ordinance in a jiffy. Law minister Kapil Sibal said this will only allow lawmakers to attend proceedings of the House and is very much in line with apex court judgments. "He will lose membership of the House if his appeal is rejected," Sibal added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted September 25, 2013 Report Share Posted September 25, 2013 They wanted even a conviction by a district court as enough reason to debar from elections, right ? You know how easily can the lower courts be manipulated by incumbent government. Idea is neat, but needs at lest high court's ruling of any conviction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ne0 Posted September 25, 2013 Report Share Posted September 25, 2013 ^^ you're being naive if you think that was the reason why the ordinance was passed .... so far, no elected representative has been convicted by a high court, the moment that happens, don't be surprised if similar ordinance is passed yet again ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted September 25, 2013 Report Share Posted September 25, 2013 yeah well.. i guess everyone knows WHY the ordinance was passed. But the argument of incumbent government at state or centre (if they have same party at state) arm twisting district courts is not without merit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bird Bird Bird Posted September 25, 2013 Report Share Posted September 25, 2013 They wanted even a conviction by a district court as enough reason to debar from elections, right ? You know how easily can the lower courts be manipulated by incumbent government. Idea is neat, but needs at lest high court's ruling of any conviction. yeah well.. i guess everyone knows WHY the ordinance was passed. But the argument of incumbent government at state or centre (if they have same party at state) arm twisting district courts is not without merit. We've been having an incumbent government for decades now. Why not let something good come out of it ? We aren't living in an ideal now, are we ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted September 25, 2013 Report Share Posted September 25, 2013 but way to counter BS is not to pile on another BS, now is it ? and look at it this way, if you (hypothetically- i am not putting words) want the incumbent govt of which so ever place to go away, then use of this (pre ordinance) law would/could have actually enabled said govt to mess around with candidates from other parties right before election. It works both ways. But anyhow, at the end of the day no party is going to support it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avkash Posted September 25, 2013 Report Share Posted September 25, 2013 just like RTI for political parties, - when something is against the political parties, the house functions perfectly and bills are passed, otherwise BJP will walk out and BSP will throw chairs and MM will get centi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted September 25, 2013 Report Share Posted September 25, 2013 It is remarkable the kind of unity shown across the political spectrum, in such specific matters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avkash Posted September 26, 2013 Report Share Posted September 26, 2013 it truly is, sab saale mile huye hain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bird Bird Bird Posted September 26, 2013 Report Share Posted September 26, 2013 http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/durables-retailers-dismayed-at-rbi-move-113092401028_1.html No 0% EMIs (camouflaged as processing fees) and no "2% extra" to be paid to any shopkeeper when using cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avkash Posted September 26, 2013 Report Share Posted September 26, 2013 removal of 2% extra is good, 0% EMI is still ambiguous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.