Jump to content

Online Shopping : deals and discussion thread


Bird Bird Bird

Recommended Posts

In other news:

 

JU5iuge.png

 

FK employee bought something from HS18, HS18 shipped it the next day, FK employee cancelled it the day after, and the item was delivered to the watchmen. Abuses ensued on Twitter. Indian companies and social media 101 ! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not so sure if you can just believe that information mate. Falsifying ledgers is a pretty serious allegation if you consider the size of a business like Flipkart. It simply cant be a 'widely known fact' because if it was Flipkart would have got their behind handed to them. Its most likely information that has been glorified by certain people who have vested interests.

 

Also, Im not sure if avoiding taxes can be achieved by Flipkart's structure that you have described above. Unless ofcourse, these are 3 different companies all together and they cross charge revenues, thereby avoiding tax/vat audits. Don't think its so easy to avoid paying taxes though. Will be interesting to read up more on this structure(if you have the information). I am into taxation advice and personally advice my clients(individuals and companies) on structuring their incomes, which is completely legal. I've assisted a few big names with their structuring but I've never come across a structure like this helping avoid taxes. Will definitely give me some good knowledge if Im able to read up on this. :)

Well, I'm not into taxation and all, but yeah, the ledger cheating news comes up every damn year, and it's all and all about FK. :/
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats very interesting. Do you have any links to this that I could read up on?

Please go through the link I attached in my earlier post. FK basically has divided into B2B and B2C companies operating under singular heads. Moreover, as the BW article says, >50% of FK sales are via WS Retail (whereas not more than 25% is allowed under Indian law). Also one of the entities, either B2B or B2C always shows up at a loss on the balance sheets while the other turns profit. I believe it's not a simple evasion, more complicated than that.

Also read some articles (2-3 months back or so) explaining how FK was modifying it's ledgers to make themselves look attractive for getting more investors interested. Will google and post if I can find them now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please go through the link I attached in my earlier post. FK basically has divided into B2B and B2C companies operating under singular heads. Moreover, as the BW article says, >50% of FK sales are via WS Retail (whereas not more than 25% is allowed under Indian law). Also one of the entities, either B2B or B2C always shows up at a loss on the balance sheets while the other turns profit. I believe it's not a simple evasion, more complicated than that.

Also read some articles (2-3 months back or so) explaining how FK was modifying it's ledgers to make themselves look attractive for getting more investors interested. Will google and post if I can find them now.

 

The article you've posted explains why its revenue is generated by B2C, because B2B is banned in India(due to FDI norms; which are now being cleared I might add). Also, I cant quite understand the loss scenario you are mentioning because it will be dispelled on two counts:

 

i) The article explicitly mentions that the transactions should be at arms length, if they are arms-length then irrespective of what profit/loss is there in the books of WS Retail; the same would have been in the books of Flipkart as well(albeit margins different due to costs).

ii) The consolidated financials will have to disclose the nature of consolidation and will include these entities in the consolidated financials.

 

Now, surely if Flipkart are falsifying ledgers the due diligence team wouldn't have missed that out? You cant just 'falsify' ledgers. Its not as simple as changing a few numbers is it? You need to establish relationships between numbers - revenue and costs, margins, trends, historical results, invoices, agreements, market price, competition etc. All of which is evaluated. And Flipkart did get a massive fresh investment 2 months back!

 

Personally, as much I hate the mistakes that Flipkart make(like the case described by Snake recently), they seem like a sound company to me. If they do go for listing Id definitely invest!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ofcourse there will be official warranty. But I haven't heard good stories about 3rd party sellers on FK. :(

 

 

http://smartphone.infibeam.com/Mobiles/apple-iphone-5s/P-mobi-39045215675-cat-z.html?primary=1#variantId=P-mobi-43474907223

 

^ This is a better option IMO. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ This is a better option IMO. :)

 

How?

So there won't be warranty na?

 

There will be the standard warranty that comes with every product but flipkart is not responsible unless you face issues within the stipulated time period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cuz Infibeam is directly selling it. That's why. :unsure:

 

How is it directly selling them?

 

Even flipkart sells them directly, anything purchased on that site is their responsibility no matter which 'retailer' is handling the product. A DoA piece will have to be replaced by flipkart, whether it goes back to the retailer / warehouse is secondary here.

 

The thing that Infibeam has in its favour is the cheaper price.

Edited by ALPHA17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...