Jump to content

why is aryan invasion theory still taught in NCERT books...?


Razpor

Poll  

22 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Its been all over the internet for over a decade now,countless dna testings have been done just to find that one trace that could prove that the mythical aryans came from the west and changed and made india the great culture it is today.But with no success ,infact it has only proven the opposite and only added to the mounting proof of cultural as well vedic references which never mention anything like aryans as a race ever and by ever i mean never.

i don't know how many of you are actually aware of it but our whole vedic culture was made a derivation and blessing of the west by so called great historian max muller, sometime in 18 th or 19 th century when he devised the theory of some mystical aryans of west ;who god knows came out of where and invaded india and civilized the relatively uncivilized harrapans and bought vedic culture with them.(as some of the western philosphers would like to tell).Its basically told that muller was astonished by the number of words in sanskrit wgich resembled the european languages,so he rashly made up the theory to explain this and at the same time help his white skin bosses establish a superiority when there was really no spine to the whole theory.

 

now my question is this ...

why in hell are we still teaching the godamn aryan invasion theory in our schools which ___

1 was never actually proven

2 basically created by the western historians just to put and keep thier white skin brethern higher.

3 is only serving to create a illusional rift between the north and south or as some call aryans and non aryans or whatever.

 

 

even american schools changed thier books in the last few years regarding the aryan theory.

here are some links that may help.

 

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_new-research-debunks-aryan-invasion-theory_1623744

 

http://tattvaanveshanam.wordpress.com/2011/05/29/genetics-delivers-another-blow-to-aryan-myth/

 

http://www.stephen-knapp.com/death_of_the_aryan_invasion_theory.htm

 

http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/ancient/aryan/aryan_agrawal.html

 

http://21centuryindia.blogspot.in/2006/08/ncert-puts-congress-propaganda-on.html

 

there are thousand other links ..so i cant post them all . So yeah this is my question cause this thing is bugging me for last few days as to why a discredited theory still taught in schools all over india.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Razpor, this is one of the many hundreds of things in history with no solid proof.

There is vast difference in the facial features, eating habits between north and south Indians, so much that one can get convinced that they could have belonged to two different races or due to heavily influenced by invaders or different races. Aryan probably never invaded india but definitely there was some amalgamation at some point of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why in hell are we still teaching the godamn aryan invasion theory in our schools which ___

1 was never actually proven

 

2 basically created by the western historians just to put and keep thier white skin brethern higher.

Why do you think so? And how this theory helped them

 

3 is only serving to create a illusional rift between the north and south or as some call aryans and non aryans or whatever

The time Max came in all was already settled, thousand year ago may be. The caste system kicked in much later which of course set the supersede among different groups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Razpor, this is one of the many hundreds of things in history with no solid proof.

There is vast difference in the facial features, eating habits between north and south Indians, so much that one can get convinced that they could have belonged to two different races or due to heavily influenced by invaders or different races. Aryan probably never invaded india but definitely there was some amalgamation at some point of time.

....maybe there was an amalgamation but its not neccessary that these white skin guys bought vedic culture with them thats what i am trying to tell.

 

But tge whole idea that the aryans taught us the vedic culture has absolutely zero bases. We are just lowering our own great culture by accepting this theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Max muller was such a great fan of Indian culture in general that he came here read our books, and changed his name to moksha muller bhattacharya. I wouldn't second guess a Sanskrit expert like him.

You dont get me do you,He is also credited with this theory to an extent so his love for white skin is evident as well. He made the whole godamn vedic culture a subset of some whites just to prove the white are superior thing dont you get that.??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks KC.

 

 

 

Wait. Does it mean you do not consider yourself as an Aryan?

 

I consider myself an indian. And aryan only means "noble" ,i think many people in southt are aryan as well.

Again i want to make sure that people here get understand that being called aryan is in noway the glory they make out to be,it only mean they are accepting that all that we try and make ourselves proud of in vedas and our history and even sanskrit is actually from the west and the so called superior white race.

When aryans are just a myth and prove is just mounting over a pile already,vedas never mention any aryan race.

 

Edit: i have no prejudice for any part of country south or north ...i am north indian as well,mostly what people would call a so called aryan... just wanted to mention this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does it matter what others think as long as you know you are right?

Its not like we are out to prove something :)

Thanks man ,it for some reason felt good listening what you said as these things have been bugging me for a few days. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More basis for the simple theory of History --

 

"The victors publish history."

 

"War does not doesn't determine who is right, war determines who is left."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...