Jump to content

The Last of Us : Part I


KnackChap
 Share

Recommended Posts

So they corrected it. He was 20 when he had Sarah who died when she was 12, and the events in part 1 takes place 20 years after that, so he should've been 52. I dunno why the original game's wiki mentions him in late 40s. If that was true Sarah would've born when he was 16.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, CarbonCore said:

So they corrected it. He was 20 when he had Sarah who died when she was 12, and the events in part 1 takes place 20 years after that, so he should've been 52. I dunno why the original game's wiki mentions him in late 40s. If that was true Sarah would've born when he was 16.

This dialogue in the original implies that Joel became a father in his teens, probably in high school. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Kumar123 said:

This dialogue in the original implies that Joel became a father in his teens, probably in high school. 

 

 

 

Man.. the ps4 remastered version feels like potato quality after playing the remake :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Vamos said:

Man.. the ps4 remastered version feels like potato quality after playing the remake :rofl:

Especially when there's a big gulf between gameplay graphics and pre-rendered cutscenes in the original. And people pick up cutscenes when comparing it with the remake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CarbonCore said:

Especially when there's a big gulf between gameplay graphics and pre-rendered cutscenes in the original. And people pick up cutscenes when comparing it with the remake.

If I recall correctly, they replaced the gameplay models with the cutscene models for the Remastered version, which means the gameplay graphics was as good as the pre-rendered cutscenes.

Edit: https://www.polygon.com/2014/5/9/5698876/the-last-of-us-ps4-cutscene-character-models-higher-resolution
 

Edited by Kumar123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kumar123 said:

If I recall correctly, they replaced the gameplay models with the cutscene models for the Remastered version, which means the gameplay graphics was as good as the pre-rendered cutscenes.

What are you talking about? Ellie's gameplay model in remaster looks like demon child compared to cutscenes. Where do you pull these titbits from? 

 

vlcsnap-2013-07-02-23zss31.png

 

This is true for all ND games except remake where gameplay and cutscenes use same model.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CarbonCore said:

What are you talking about? Ellie's gameplay model in remaster looks like demon child compared to cutscenes. Where do you pull these titbits from? 

 

vlcsnap-2013-07-02-23zss31.png

 

This is true for all ND games except remake where gameplay and cutscenes use same model.

 

She looks good to me. Did you check out the article I linked?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kumar123 said:

She looks good to me. Did you check out the article I linked?

 

Yes its a bullshit article from Polygon, or a bullshit claim from ND before release. We know for a fact that pre-rendered cutscenes in all ND games run higher quality assets than gameplay. That's why they are pre-rendered :lol:  Remake is the first one where this is not true and they made it one of the key marketing points. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Kumar123 said:

I mean, this is a shitty capture on YouTube. You played the remake on an OLED. Should probably try replaying the Remastered version before making conclusions like that. 


I have probably put in around 120 hours on the remastered and part 2, each. 

 

The capture has nothing to do with it. All youtube videos are compressed and look inferior compared to native console output, even the remake. 

Even if you don’t account for YouTube’s compression, they are still not the same when you watch a recorded version off the console directly. 

Edited by Vamos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CarbonCore said:

 

Yes its a bullshit article from Polygon, or a bullshit claim from ND before release. We know for a fact that pre-rendered cutscenes in all ND games run higher quality assets than gameplay. That's why they are pre-rendered :lol:  Remake is the first one where this is not true and they made it one of the key marketing points. 

Bro, you are right in the case of the PS3 version. It obviously wasn't powerful enough to have the cutscene models during gameplay, but the PS4 was and therefore they replaced the lower res gameplay models with the cutscene ones. However, they still used the pre-rendered cutscenes for the Remastered version probably because doing it in real time meant redoing(remaking) all the cutscenes which was probably too much work, especially when you consider that the difference is just the absence of that black frame between gameplay and cutscenes.

Edited by Kumar123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Vamos said:


I have probably put in around 120 hours on the remastered and part 2, each. 

 

The capture has nothing to do with it. All youtube videos are compressed and look inferior compared to native console output, even the remake. 

Even if you don’t account for YouTube’s compression, they are still not the same when you watch a recorded version off the console directly. 

Alright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Kumar123 said:

They retconned Joel's age by the way. He was in his late 40s in the original. 52 in the remake.

Damn, this totally changes the dynamic of this game.
 

i guess this is the reason why it is being called as Remade for the ps5 from the “ground up”, The change is earth shattering. 
 

damn sony.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Nathan.Drake said:

Damn, this totally changes the dynamic of this game.
 

i guess this is the reason why it is being called as Remade for the ps5 from the “ground up”, The change is earth shattering. 
 

damn sony.

Lol, I was just sharing something I learned. Didn't imply that it was good or bad. I guess it kind of explains why remake Joel looks 4-5 years older than the original. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...